Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2024) Volume 8, Issue 6

Patient-Centered Rehabilitation: A Holistic Approach to Healthcare Recovery

Sato Aoki

Department of Critical Care Centre, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan

Corresponding Author:
Sato Aoki
Department of Critical Care Centre
Tohoku University Hospital
Japan
E-mail: sato@aki.cn

Received: 02-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-155734; Editor assigned: 04-Nov-2024, PreQC No. AAOSR-24-155734 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Nov-2024, QC No. AAOSR-24-155734; Revised: 25-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-155734 (R); Published: 30-Nov-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaosr-8.6.239

Citation:  Aoki S. Patient-centered rehabilitation: A holistic approach to healthcare recovery. J Ortho Sur Reh. 2024;8(6):239.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Abstract

    

Introduction

The healthcare landscape has witnessed a significant shift from traditional, provider-centered models to approaches that prioritize the needs, preferences, and involvement of patients. One area where this paradigm shift has become increasingly crucial is rehabilitation. Patient-centered rehabilitation focuses on treating the whole person, not just their physical symptoms, ensuring that recovery is not only effective but also meaningful and sustainable. This article explores the concept of patient-centered rehabilitation, its principles, benefits, and the future of this approach in improving health outcomes. Patient-centered rehabilitation is an approach that places the patient at the core of the rehabilitation process. It is built on the understanding that each individual is unique, with different needs, preferences, goals, and experiences. [1,2].

The goal is to empower patients to take an active role in their recovery by collaborating with healthcare providers in a manner that is respectful, empathetic, and supportive. Rather than focusing solely on the clinical aspects of rehabilitation, such as physical therapy or medication management, patient-centered rehabilitation also emphasizes psychological, social, and emotional support. This approach encourages healthcare professionals to understand the patient’s values and goals, taking into account factors like their lifestyle, culture, and personal challenges. It ensures that care is tailored to the specific needs of the patient, which can improve both satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Effective communication between patients and healthcare providers is central to patient-centered rehabilitation. Patients are encouraged to share their concerns, goals, and preferences openly, and healthcare providers must listen attentively, providing clear and understandable explanations. [3,4].

This collaboration ensures that care plans align with the patient’s desires, fostering a sense of ownership over their rehabilitation. Every patient is unique, and their experiences of illness or injury are personal. Patient-centered rehabilitation respects each person’s individuality, taking into account their physical condition, mental health, socioeconomic status, and cultural background. By acknowledging these factors, rehabilitation efforts are more likely to resonate with the patient, leading to better engagement and results. The approach recognizes that rehabilitation is not just about physical recovery but also involves emotional, psychological, and social recovery. For instance, a patient recovering from a stroke may face not only physical impairments but also emotional challenges like depression or anxiety. [5,6].

Addressing these issues alongside physical rehabilitation leads to a more comprehensive recovery. One of the most critical aspects of patient-centered rehabilitation is empowering patients to take an active role in their recovery. This involves providing them with the knowledge and tools they need to make informed decisions about their care. Empowerment helps patients feel more in control of their health, which can motivate them to engage more fully in their rehabilitation process. Patient-centered rehabilitation also focuses on continuity of care. This means ensuring that patients have access to consistent and coordinated care across various stages of rehabilitation. Continuity is essential for preventing setbacks and ensuring that patients make steady progress towards their goals. [7,8].

Empowering patients to take an active role in their care fosters independence. As patients work with healthcare providers to set achievable goals and develop a rehabilitation plan, they gain the confidence and skills necessary to manage their health post-rehabilitation. This self-reliance can lead to a higher quality of life and a decreased reliance on healthcare professionals over time. The future of patient-centered rehabilitation is promising, as advancements in technology and healthcare delivery are making personalized care more accessible. Telemedicine, for example, allows patients to consult with healthcare providers remotely, which can be particularly beneficial for individuals in rural or underserved areas. [9,10].

Conclusion

Patient-centered rehabilitation represents a holistic, individualized approach to healthcare recovery that values the input, preferences, and experiences of patients. By focusing not only on physical recovery but also on emotional, social, and psychological well-being, this approach offers a more comprehensive and meaningful path to recovery

References

  1. Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):159-171.

    2.   Indexed at, Google Scholar ,Cross Ref

  2. Liu X, Dong Z, Li J, et al. Factors affecting the incidence of surgical site infection after geriatric hip fracture surgery: A retrospective multicenter study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:1-9.

    3.   Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  3. Sheridan E, Wiseman JM, Malik AT, et al. The role of sociodemographics in the occurrence of orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2019;50(7):1288-92.

    4.      Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  4. Court Brown CM. The changing epidemiology of fall related fractures in adults. Injury. 2017;48(4):819-824.

    5.   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  5. Colman M. Prolonged operative time increases infection rate in tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2013;44(2):249-52.

    6.  Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  6. Shao J, Zhang H, Yin B, et al.Risk factors for surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Surg J. 2018;56:124-32.

    7.  Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  7. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-697.

    8.                Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Fares AB, Childs BR, Polmear MM, et al. Dorsal Bridge Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46(7):627.e1-627.e8.

    9.   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Dan MacLeod, Common Dimensions, Ergoweb® Learning Center, September 8, 2013.

    10.  Google scholar

  10. Giddins G, Giddins H. Wrist and hand postures when falling and description of the upper limb falling reflex. Injury. 2021;52(4):869-876.

    11.               Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App