Archives of General Internal Medicine

Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Archives of General Internal Medicine (2024) Volume 8, Issue 6

Patient-Centered Care: A Key to Improving Healthcare Outcomes.

Pintai Marky*

Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, China

*Corresponding Author:
Pintai Marky
Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, China
E-mail:pintaimarky@hku.hk

Received: 02-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. AAAGIM-24-155885; Editor assigned: 05-Dec-2024, PreQC No. AAAGIM-24-155885(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Dec-2024, QC No. AAAGIM-24-155885; Revised: 20-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. AAAGIM-24-155885(R); Published: 30-Dec-2024, DOI:10.35841/aaagim-8.6.265

Citation: : Marky P. Patient-centered care: A key to improving healthcare outcomes. Arch Gen Intern Med. 2024;8(6):265.

Visit for more related articles at Archives of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

  

Introduction

Patient-Centered Care (PCC) is a holistic approach to healthcare that prioritizes the needs, preferences, and values of patients in the decision-making process. It emphasizes the importance of a strong partnership between healthcare providers and patients, ensuring that care is not only clinically effective but also compassionate and responsive to the patient's individual circumstances [1].

This model is gaining prominence as a way to improve health outcomes, enhance patient satisfaction, and reduce healthcare costs by focusing on the overall well-being of the individual rather than just the treatment of a disease. At the heart of PCC is the concept of respect for patient autonomy [2].

Healthcare professionals are encouraged to listen actively to their patients, engage them in discussions about their treatment options, and respect their choices, even if they differ from medical recommendations. This shift in approach recognizes that patients are not passive recipients of care but active participants in managing their health [3].

It also acknowledges that individuals have diverse cultural, social, and personal preferences that influence their healthcare decisions. One critical aspect of PCC is effective communication. Healthcare providers must establish clear and empathetic communication with patients to understand their needs and concerns [4].

This involves not only providing medical information but also ensuring that patients feel heard and understood. Studies have shown that when patients feel more involved in their care, they are more likely to adhere to treatment plans, experience improved health outcomes, and report higher levels of satisfaction with their care [5].

PCC also integrates the concept of coordinated care, which involves collaboration among healthcare providers across different specialties and care settings. This is especially important for patients with chronic conditions, who may require care from multiple healthcare professionals [6].

By working together, healthcare teams can ensure that all aspects of a patient’s care are aligned and that there is continuity in treatment, which is essential for improving long-term outcomes. Moreover, PCC extends beyond the clinical setting to address the social determinants of health. Providers are encouraged to consider factors such as socioeconomic status, education, and access to resources when developing care plans [7].

This broader perspective allows for more comprehensive care that addresses not only medical needs but also social and emotional factors that can affect a patient's health. The benefits of patient-centered care are well-documented. Research consistently shows that this approach can lead to better patient satisfaction, improved health outcomes, and more efficient use of healthcare resources [8].

Additionally, patient-centered care has been linked to lower rates of hospital readmissions and better management of chronic diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension. Despite its benefits, implementing PCC can be challenging. It requires changes in healthcare systems, including training providers to communicate effectively, redesigning care delivery processes, and ensuring that patients have access to the necessary resources and support [9].

However, with continued advocacy and investment in patient-centered models, healthcare systems can evolve to deliver care that is not only effective but also compassionate and responsive to the needs of the individuals they serve [10].

Conclusion

Preventive care is essential for improving public health, reducing healthcare costs, and ensuring a sustainable healthcare system. By emphasizing primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies, healthcare systems can reduce the burden of chronic diseases, improve health outcomes, and enhance quality of life. While challenges such as access, patient adherence, and systemic barriers remain, addressing these issues through policy changes, increased funding, and public health education can help ensure that preventive care reaches all populations. Ultimately, investing in prevention is an investment in the health and well-being of future generations.

References

  1. Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Fuster V, et al. Intimomedial interface damage and adventitial inflammation is increased beneath disrupted atherosclerosis in the aorta: implications for plaque vulnerability. Circu. 2002;105(21):2504-11.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Rodefeld MD, Culbertson CB, Rosenfeld HM, et al. Pulmonary artery translocation: A surgical option for complex anomalous coronary artery anatomy. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2001;72(6):2150-2.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Di Lello F, Mnuk JF, Flemma RJ, et al. Successful coronary reimplantation for anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the left sinus of Valsalva. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102(3):455-6.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  4. Durakovic A, Andersen H, Christiansen A, et al.Retrospective analysis of radial EBUS outcome for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesion: sensitivity and complications. Euro Clin Resp J. 2015;2(1):28947.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Georgiou HD, Taverner J, Irving LB, et al.Safety and efficacy of radial EBUS for the investigation of peripheral pulmonary lesions in patients with advanced COPD. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2016;23(3):192-8.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Chen CH, Cheng WC, Wu BR, et al.Improved diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in peripheral pulmonary lesions: combination of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and rapid on-site evaluation. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:418-25.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, et al.Utility and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound With Bronchoscope-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Mediastinal Lymph Node Sampling: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Respir Care. 2015;60:1040-50.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Peitzman SJ.Chronic dialysis and dialysis doctors in the United States: A nephrologist-historian’s perspective.Semin Dial. 2001;14:200–8.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, et al.Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med. 1966;275:1089–92.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Blagg CR. The early history of dialysis for chronic renal failure in the United States: a view from Seattle. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49:482–96.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App