Journal of Psychology and Cognition

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Opinion Article - Journal of Psychology and Cognition (2024) Volume 9, Issue 1

Overcoming Irrationality: Strategies to Combat Cognitive Biases in Financial Decisions

Rafi Shenn *

Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author:
Rafi Shenn
Department of Mathematics, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan
E-mail: rfi.shrn@umt.edu.pk

Received: 26-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130246; Editor assigned: 28- Dec -2023, PreQC No. AAPHPP-24-130246 (PQ); Reviewed:11 -Jan-2024, QC No. AAPHPP-24-130246; Revised:17- Jan -2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130246 (R); Published:22- Jan -2024, DOI:10.35841/ aajpc-9.1.211

Citation: : Shenn R. Overcoming Irrationality: Strategies to Combat Cognitive Biases in Financial Decisions.J Psychol Cognition. 2024;9(1):211

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Psychology and Cognition

Introduction

Making sound financial decisions requires not just financial literacy but also an awareness of our own cognitive biases. These biases, or mental shortcuts, often lead us astray and can result in irrational financial choices. From buying stocks impulsively to underestimating risks, our minds are prone to various biases that can jeopardize our financial well-being. Recognizing and addressing these biases is crucial for making more rational and effective financial decisions. Here are some strategies to combat cognitive biases in financial matters [1].

Many financial decisions are made impulsively. Slow down and take the time to deliberate. Avoid making decisions under pressure or in emotional states. By allowing yourself more time, you can reduce the influence of biases like anchoring (relying too heavily on the first piece of information encountered) and framing (being swayed by how information is presented).Consult with others before making major financial decisions. Seek out diverse opinions and viewpoints. This can help counteract biases like groupthink (the desire for harmony or conformity within a group). By inviting different perspectives, you can gain insights that challenge your own biases and assumptions [2].

Many financial decisions are made impulsively. Slow down and take the time to deliberate. Avoid making decisions under pressure or in emotional states. By allowing yourself more time, you can reduce the influence of biases like anchoring (relying too heavily on the first piece of information encountered) and framing (being swayed by how information is presented).Consult with others before making major financial decisions. Seek out diverse opinions and viewpoints. This can help counteract biases like groupthink (the desire for harmony or conformity within a group). By inviting different perspectives, you can gain insights that challenge your own biases and assumptions [3].

Employ decision-making frameworks or tools that encourage a structured approach. For example, consider using a decision matrix to weigh pros and cons objectively. Tools like this can mitigate the impact of biases such as overconfidence (believing in one's own abilities or judgments more than justified by evidence).Establish clear financial goals and guidelines in advance. This can help anchor your decisions to an objective framework rather than relying solely on intuition or emotions. Having predefined rules can counteract biases such as mental accounting (treating money differently based on its source) and the endowment effect (valuing something more merely because you own it [4].

In addition to individual patient care, family physicians also play a vital role in promoting community health and well-being. By partnering with local organizations, schools, and government agencies, they can address broader public health issues, such as access to healthcare services, health disparities, and social determinants of health. Through community outreach initiatives, health education programs, and advocacy efforts, family physicians can empower individuals and communities to make healthier choices and create environments that support health and wellness.One example of the holistic approach in action is the concept of the medical home [5].

Put mechanisms in place to review and evaluate decisions objectively. Consider setting up automatic triggers for reassessment or involving a trusted advisor or partner in decision-making processes. This can mitigate biases related to overconfidence and anchoring.Finally, embrace a mindset of continuous improvement. Reflect on past decisions and outcomes, especially when things go wrong. Learning from mistakes can help you recognize recurring biases and refine your decision-making process over time [6].

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in arrests, sentencing, and incarceration rates demand a critical examination of strategies to identify and rectify systemic biases. An inclusive evaluation ensures that criminal justice policies are fair and just for all members of society. Legal reforms and legislative changes significantly shape the strategies employed within the criminal justice system [7].

Another essential aspect of holistic healthcare is the emphasis on preventive care and health promotion. Rather than solely focusing on treating acute illnesses, family physicians strive to prevent disease and promote wellness through lifestyle modifications, health screenings, and immunizations. By addressing risk factors and promoting healthy behaviors, such as exercise, nutrition, and stress management, family physicians can help patients reduce their risk of developing chronic conditions and improve their overall quality of life [8].

Assessing the impact of these programs involves evaluating their contribution to improved investigative techniques, enhanced community engagement, and a more informed and empathetic approach to justice. Professional development initiatives contribute to the overall effectiveness of the criminal justice system. A robust assessment ensures that the criminal justice system evolves in response to societal needs, advancements in knowledge, and changes in legislative landscapes [9].

Employ decision-making frameworks or tools that encourage a structured approach. For example, consider using a decision matrix to weigh pros and cons objectively. Tools like this can mitigate the impact of biases such as overconfidence (believing in one's own abilities or judgments more than justified by evidence).Establish clear financial goals and guidelines in advance. This can help anchor your decisions to an objective framework rather than relying solely on intuition or emotions. Having predefined rules can counteract biases such as mental accounting (treating money differently based on its source) and the endowment effect (valuing something more merely because you own it) [10].

conclusion

In conclusion, cognitive biases are inherent in human thinking and can significantly impact financial decisions. However, by adopting strategies that promote awareness, deliberation, and objectivity, individuals can mitigate the influence of these biases and make more rational financial choices. Overcoming irrationality in financial decision-making is an ongoing journey that requires self-awareness, education, and a commitment to applying behavioral insights to achieve better outcomes. By incorporating these strategies into your financial planning, you can navigate the complexities of money management with greater clarity and confidence

References

  1. Serrano-Pozo A, Das S, Hyman BT. APOE and Alzheimer's disease: Advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurology. 2021;20(1):68-80.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Khan S, Barve KH, Kumar MS. Recent advancements in pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(11):1106-25.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Naseri NN, Wang H, Guo J, et al. The complexity of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2019;705:183-94.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Graff-Radford J, Yong KX, Apostolova LG, et al. New insights into a typical Alzheimer's disease in the era of biomarkers. Lancet Neurology. 2021;20(3):222-34.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Hane FT, Robinson M, Lee BY, et al. Recent progress in Alzheimer’s disease research, part 3: Diagnosis and treatment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(3):645-65.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Ballard R, Perez-Reisler M. Developmental aspects of pediatric mental health. Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(10):e426-30.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Bauger L, Bongaardt R. Structural developmental psychology and health promotion in the third age. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(4):686-94.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Chastain EJ.Information Theory, Developmental Psychology, and the Baldwin Effect. Front Neurorobot. 2018;12:52.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Frankenhuis WE, Tiokhin L. Bridging evolutionary biology and developmental psychology: Toward an enduring theoretical infrastructure. Child Dev. 2018;89(6):2303-6.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Kline MA, Shamsudheen R, Broesch T. Variation is the universal: Making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1743):20170059.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App