Otolaryngology Online Journal

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Rapid Communication - Otolaryngology Online Journal (2024) Volume 14, Issue 6

Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty: The Rise of Injectable Treatments

Sofia Moreno *

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Barcelona, Spain

*Corresponding Author:
Sofia Moreno
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Barcelona, Spain
E-mail: sofia.moreno@example.es

Received: 29-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. JORL-23-152396; Editor assigned: 02-Nov-2024, PreQC No. JORL-23-152396; Reviewed:16-Nov-2024, QC No. JORL-23-152396; Revised:21-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. JORL-23-152396 (R); Published:28-Nov-2024, DOI:10.35841/ jorl-14.6.413

Visit for more related articles at Otolaryngology Online Journal

Abstract

   

Introduction

Non-surgical rhinoplasty, often referred to as the “liquid nose job,” has rapidly gained popularity as an alternative to traditional surgical rhinoplasty. This innovative approach uses injectable treatments, such as dermal fillers, to reshape and enhance the nose without the need for incisions or general anesthesia. As aesthetic preferences continue to evolve, non-surgical rhinoplasty offers patients a less invasive option to achieve their desired appearance, making it an appealing choice for many [1].

The origins of non-surgical rhinoplasty can be traced back to the early use of fillers in aesthetic medicine. Initially used for volumizing areas of the face, practitioners began to explore their applications in nasal contouring. Over time, advancements in filler technology and a deeper understanding of facial anatomy have paved the way for more refined and effective non-surgical techniques [2].

One of the primary reasons for the rise of non-surgical rhinoplasty is the appeal of minimal downtime. Unlike traditional rhinoplasty, which often requires a significant recovery period, patients who opt for injectable treatments can typically return to their daily activities almost immediately. This convenience is particularly attractive to those with busy lifestyles who wish to avoid the lengthy healing process associated with surgery [3].

Injectable rhinoplasty is primarily performed using hyaluronic acid-based fillers, which are well-known for their safety and versatility. These fillers can add volume, smooth out irregularities, and create a more harmonious profile by enhancing specific areas of the nose. The temporary nature of these treatments also allows patients to experiment with their appearance without making a permanent commitment [4].

The procedure itself is relatively straightforward and usually takes less than an hour. After a consultation to discuss the patient's goals, the practitioner applies a topical anesthetic to minimize discomfort. The filler is then carefully injected into targeted areas of the nose, allowing for immediate results that can be seen right after the treatment [5].

Despite its advantages, non-surgical rhinoplasty is not without limitations. While injectable treatments can effectively enhance the nose's shape and profile, they cannot correct structural issues, such as a deviated septum or significant nasal deformities. Patients seeking more drastic changes may still need to consider traditional surgical options [6].

Another important consideration is the longevity of results. While many dermal fillers last anywhere from six months to two years, patients must be aware that maintenance treatments are required to sustain their desired look. This aspect contrasts with surgical rhinoplasty, which offers permanent changes but comes with its own set of risks and recovery challenges [7].

The rise of social media and the increasing influence of beauty standards have contributed significantly to the popularity of non-surgical rhinoplasty. With the ability to showcase immediate results, patients are more inclined to share their experiences online, inspiring others to consider injectable treatments. This visibility has fueled a growing interest in cosmetic procedures that can be performed with minimal disruption to daily life [8].

As non-surgical rhinoplasty continues to gain traction, the importance of choosing a qualified and experienced practitioner cannot be overstated. Unlike traditional surgery, where procedures are often performed by board-certified plastic surgeons or otolaryngologists, injectable treatments can be offered by a broader range of medical professionals. It is crucial for patients to research their providers to ensure safety and achieve optimal results [9].

Patient education plays a vital role in the decision-making process. Individuals considering non-surgical rhinoplasty should be informed about the procedure's benefits, risks, and limitations. Open discussions with a qualified practitioner can help set realistic expectations and ensure that patients make informed choices about their aesthetic goals [10].

conclusion

Non-surgical rhinoplasty represents a significant advancement in aesthetic medicine, offering patients a viable alternative to traditional surgical procedures. By harnessing the power of injectable treatments, individuals can achieve subtle enhancements to their nasal contours with minimal downtime and less risk. As this field continues to evolve, it is likely that non-surgical rhinoplasty will remain a popular choice for those seeking to enhance their appearance without the commitment of surgery

References

  1. Harb A, Brewster CT. The nonsurgical rhinoplasty: a retrospective review of 5000 treatments. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2020;145(3):661-7.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. DeVictor S, Ong AA, Sherris DA. Complications secondary to nonsurgical rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2021;165(5):611-6.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Bouaoud J, Belloc JB. Use of injectables in rhinoplasty retouching: towards an evolution of surgical strategy? Literature review. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2020;121(5):550-5.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Babu SH, Rapaport BH. A critical review of complications in non?surgical rhinoplasty and their management. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2021;20(11):3391-7.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Williams LC, Kidwai SM, Mehta K, et al. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty: a systematic review of technique, outcomes, and complications. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2020;146(1):41-51.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Beneduce N, Botter C, Coiante E, et al. The longevity of the nonsurgical rhinoplasty: a literature review. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2023;124(1):101319.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Scarano A, Sbarbati A, Amuso D, et al. The Use of Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid in Non-surgical Rhinoplasty Using Italian Technique. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024:1-1.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Demesh D, Cristel RT, Gandhi ND, et al. Effects of hyaluronic acid filler injection for non?surgical rhinoplasty on first impressions and quality of life (FACE?Q scale). Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2022;21(8):3351-7.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Radulesco T, Braccini F, Kestemont P, et al. A safe nonsurgical rhinoplasty procedure. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2022;150(1):83e-6e.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Dilber M, Muluk NB, Cingi C. A narrative-style review of non-surgical rhinoplasty: indications, outcomes, and limitations. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2024.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App