Journal of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Mini Review - Journal of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Research (2024) Volume 9, Issue 4

Neuroimaging Techniques in the Evaluation of Pediatric Brain Tumors

Felice Culleton *

Department of Radiology, AZ Maria Middelares, Belgium

*Corresponding Author:
Felice Culleton
Department of Radiology, AZ Maria Middelares, Belgium
E-mail: culleton@bl.edu.in

Received: 26-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. JNNR-24-144120; Editor assigned: 27-Jun-2024, PreQC No. JNNR-24-144120(PQ); Reviewed: 11-July-2024, QC No. JNNR-24-144120; Revised: 16-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. JNNR-24-144120(R); Published: 24-Jul-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aajnnr-9.4.215

Citation: : Culleton F. Neuroimaging Techniques in the Evaluation of Pediatric Brain Tumors. J Neurol Neurorehab Res.2024;9(4):215

Introduction

Neuroimaging techniques play a crucial role in the evaluation and management of pediatric brain tumors, offering invaluable insights into tumor characterization, treatment planning, and monitoring. These imaging modalities help clinicians understand the tumor’s location, size, type, and involvement with surrounding structures, which are essential for effective diagnosis and therapeutic strategies [1].

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the cornerstone of neuroimaging for pediatric brain tumors due to its superior soft tissue contrast and ability to delineate tumor boundaries with high precision. MRI provides detailed information on tumor morphology, including its size, shape, and location relative to critical brain structures [2]. Advanced MRI techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), enhance the evaluation of brain tumors by offering insights into the tumor’s microenvironment and metabolic activity. DTI, for instance, allows for the mapping of white matter tracts and helps in assessing the impact of the tumor on neural pathways, which is crucial for surgical planning. MRS provides metabolic information by identifying biochemical changes associated with different tumor types, aiding in tumor differentiation and monitoring [3].

Computed Tomography (CT) scans are also commonly used in the evaluation of pediatric brain tumors, particularly in emergency settings where rapid assessment is needed. CT imaging is valuable for its ability to quickly identify calcifications, hemorrhage, and hydrocephalus, which can be associated with various types of brain tumors. While CT provides less soft tissue contrast compared to MRI, it is often used in conjunction with MRI to provide a comprehensive assessment of the tumor and its effects on the surrounding brain structures [4].

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is another important neuroimaging modality, although its use in pediatric brain tumor evaluation is less common compared to MRI and CT. PET imaging involves the administration of radiotracers that bind to specific biological molecules, allowing for the visualization of metabolic activity within the tumor [5]. This technique is particularly useful for assessing the aggressiveness of the tumor, evaluating response to therapy, and detecting residual or recurrent disease. PET is often combined with CT (PET/CT) to provide both metabolic and anatomic information, improving the accuracy of tumor evaluation and management [6].

Functional MRI (fMRI) is a specialized imaging technique that measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood flow associated with neuronal activity. Although primarily used in research settings, fMRI has potential applications in the evaluation of pediatric brain tumors, especially in assessing functional brain areas that may be affected by the tumor. This technique can help in planning surgical interventions by identifying critical functional regions that need to be preserved to minimize neurological deficits [7].

Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is used to evaluate the blood vessels in and around brain tumors. MRA provides detailed images of the cerebral vasculature, helping to assess tumor-associated vascular abnormalities such as increased blood flow or the presence of abnormal blood vessels. This information is critical for surgical planning and understanding the tumor’s potential impact on cerebral circulation [8].

Intraoperative imaging techniques, including intraoperative MRI and ultrasound, provide real-time imaging during brain tumor surgery. These modalities allow surgeons to visualize the tumor and its relationship with surrounding structures, facilitating precise tumor resection and minimizing damage to critical brain regions. Intraoperative imaging is particularly valuable in pediatric patients, where preserving neurological function is essential for long-term outcomes [9].

Recent advances in neuroimaging, such as the development of high-resolution imaging techniques and improved radiotracers, continue to enhance the evaluation of pediatric brain tumors. These innovations enable more accurate tumor characterization, better assessment of treatment response, and improved monitoring of disease progression. The integration of various imaging modalities, including advanced MRI techniques, CT, PET, and intraoperative imaging, provides a comprehensive approach to the evaluation of pediatric brain tumors, ultimately leading to more effective treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes [10].

Conclusion

Neuroimaging techniques are essential in the management of pediatric brain tumors, offering detailed information that guides diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring. MRI remains the primary tool due to its excellent soft tissue contrast, while CT, PET, fMRI, MRA, and intraoperative imaging provide additional valuable insights. The ongoing advancements in neuroimaging continue to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of pediatric brain tumor evaluation, contributing to better clinical outcomes and enhanced quality of life for young patients.

References

  1. Ailion AS, Hortman K, King TZ. Childhood brain tumors: a systematic review of the structural neuroimaging literature. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017;27:220-44.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Poussaint TY, Rodriguez D. Advanced neuroimaging of pediatric brain tumors: MR diffusion, MR perfusion, and MR spectroscopy. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006;16(1):169-92.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Warmuth-Metz M. Imaging and diagnosis in pediatric brain tumor studies. Springer Sci. Rev; 2017.

    4. Google Scholar

  4. Warmuth-Metz M, Bison B, Leykamm S. Neuroradiologic review in pediatric brain tumor studies. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19(4):263.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Barkovich AJ. Neuroimaging of pediatric brain tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1992;3(4):739-69.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  6. Maytal J, Bienkowski RS, Patel M, et al. The value of brain imaging in children with headaches. Pediatrics. 1995;96(3):413-6.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Helton KJ, Edwards M, Steen RG, et al. Neuroimaging-detected late transient treatment-induced lesions in pediatric patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(2):179-86.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Vézina LG. Neuroradiology of childhood brain tumors: new challenges. J Neurooncol. 2005;75(3):243.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Finlay JL, Goins SC. Brain tumors in children: I. Advances in diagnosis. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1987;9(3):246-55.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  10. Lequin M, Hendrikse J. Advanced MR Imaging in Pediatric Brain Tumors, Clinical Applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016;27(1):167.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App