Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Opinion Article - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1

Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Adoptive Cell Therapy: A New Era of Cancer Treatment

Haohan Gu*

Department of Gynaecology, Kunming Medical University, China

*Corresponding Author:
Haohan Gu
Department of Gynaecology, Kunming Medical University, China
E-mail: guohao@kmmu.edu.cn

Received: 03-Feb -2025, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-25-161374; Editor assigned: 04-Feb-2025, PreQC No. AAJCIT-25-161374 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Feb-2025, QC No. AAJCIT-25-161374; Revised:23-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-25-161374 (R); Published:28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/aajcit-8.1.248

Citation: Guo H. Natural killer (nk) cells in adoptive cell therapy: A new era of cancer treatment. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2025;8(1):248

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Abstract

  

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating the development of innovative and effective treatment modalities. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has emerged as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy, harnessing the body's immune system to fight malignancies. Among the various immune cells employed in ACT, Natural Killer (NK) cells have garnered significant attention due to their potent anti-tumor capabilities and reduced risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This article explores the role of NK cells in ACT, their advantages over other cell-based therapies, and the future of NK cell-based cancer treatment [1].

Natural Killer (NK) cells are a subset of lymphocytes that play a crucial role in the innate immune response. Unlike T cells, NK cells do not require prior sensitization to recognize and eliminate tumor cells. They exert their cytotoxic effects through several mechanisms, including direct cell lysis via perforin and granzyme release, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and cytokine production (Caligiuri, 2008). The ability of NK cells to distinguish between normal and malignant cells is governed by a balance between activating and inhibitory receptors [2].

The use of NK cells in adoptive cell therapy presents several advantages: Unlike T cells, NK cells do not rely on antigen-specific T cell receptors, making them safer for allogeneic transplantation. NK cells can target a wide range of tumor types without prior sensitization [3].

NK cells can work synergistically with monoclonal antibodies like Rituximab and Trastuzumab to enhance ADCC. NK cells can be engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) to enhance tumor specificity and persistence [4].

NK cells for adoptive therapy can be derived from multiple sources NK cells can be isolated from donor blood and expanded ex vivo. A rich source of naïve NK cells with high proliferative potential [5].

NK cells generated from iPSCs offer a renewable and customizable option for therapy. Genetically modified cell lines, such as NK-92, provide an off-the-shelf alternative. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of NK cell-based therapies against hematological malignancies and solid tumors [6].

NK cell therapy has shown promising results in AML patients, leading to durable remission. The combination of NK cells with monoclonal antibodies enhances tumor clearance. Challenges such as the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment are being addressed through genetic modifications and combination therapies [7].

Despite their potential, NK cell-based therapies face several challenges: Enhancing NK cell survival and proliferation in vivo is critical for sustained therapeutic effects [8].

The immunosuppressive nature of solid tumors hinders NK cell function, necessitating strategies to enhance infiltration and activity. While CAR-T cells have demonstrated success, optimizing CAR-NK cells for improved persistence and specificity is an ongoing area of research [9].

As advancements in NK cell expansion, persistence, and engineering continue, NK cell therapy is poised to revolutionize cancer treatment, offering hope to patients with refractory malignancies [10].

Conclusion

NK cell-based adoptive cell therapy represents a promising frontier in cancer treatment. Their innate cytotoxic capabilities, reduced GVHD risk, and potential for genetic modifications make them an attractive option for immunotherapy.

References

  1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Sci. 2018;359(6382):1350-5.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Gubin MM, Zhang X, Schuster Het al., Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens. Nat. 2014;515(7528):577-81.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Ramsay AG. Immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy to activate anti?tumour T?cell immunity. Br J Haematol. 2013;162(3):313-25.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Huang AC, Zappasodi R. A decade of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in melanoma: understanding the molecular basis for immune sensitivity and resistance. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(5):660-70.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Meng X, Huang Z, Teng F, Xing L, et al.,. Predictive biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41(10):868-76.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Xiao Y, Freeman GJ. The microsatellite instable subset of colorectal cancer is a particularly good candidate for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2015;5(1):16-8.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. ?uksza M, Riaz N, Makarov V, et al., A neoantigen fitness model predicts tumour response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Nat. 2017;551(7681):517-20.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):252-64.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Teng F, Kong L, Meng X, et al., Radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy: achievements and challenges. Cancer Lett. 2015;365(1):23-9.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Johanns TM, Miller CA, Dorward IG, et al., Immunogenomics of hypermutated glioblastoma: a patient with germline POLE deficiency treated with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(11):1230-6.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App