Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2024) Volume 8, Issue 6

Minimally Invasive Surgery: Revolutionizing Modern Medicine

Gabrie Kays

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, United States

Corresponding Author:
Gabrie Kays
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation,,
University of Florida,
United States
E-mail: Marckaye@jax.ufl.edu

Received: 02-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-155721; Editor assigned: 04-Nov-2024, PreQC No. AAOSR-24-155721 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Nov-2024, QC No. AAOSR-24-155721; Revised: 25-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-155721 (R); Published: 30-Nov-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaosr-8.6.231

Citation:  Kays G. Minimally invasive surgery: Revolutionizing modern medicine. J Ortho Sur Reh. 2024;8(6):231.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Abstract

    

Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has emerged as a transformative advancement in the medical field, offering patients and healthcare providers numerous benefits compared to traditional open surgeries. By utilizing cutting-edge technologies and innovative techniques, MIS minimizes the physical and emotional toll of surgical procedures while improving recovery outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery refers to a range of surgical procedures performed through tiny incisions or natural body openings, using specialized instruments and advanced imaging technologies. Unlike conventional open surgery, which often requires large incisions to access internal organs, MIS relies on tools such as laparoscopes, endoscopes, and robotic-assisted systems to execute precise interventions. [1,2].

Small incisions significantly decrease tissue damage, leading to less postoperative pain and discomfort. Patients undergoing MIS typically experience faster recovery periods, allowing them to return to their normal activities sooner. The reduced size of surgical wounds minimizes the exposure to pathogens, lowering the likelihood of infections. Smaller scars are less noticeable, enhancing the aesthetic appeal for patients. Many MIS procedures are performed on an outpatient basis, reducing the time spent in medical facilities and associated costs. Minimally invasive techniques have become standard in various medical specialties. Procedures such as gallbladder removal (cholecystectomy) and hernia repair are commonly performed laparoscopically. Arthroscopic surgery for joint repair has revolutionized treatments for sports injuries and arthritis. [3,4].

Minimally invasive heart procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), have improved outcomes for patients with heart disease. Hysterectomies and treatments for endometriosis benefit from MIS techniques.Procedures like prostatectomies and kidney surgeries are increasingly performed using robotic systems.Advances in medical technology have been pivotal in the evolution of minimally invasive surgery. High-definition imaging systems, robotic-assisted platforms, and enhanced surgical tools provide unparalleled precision and control. For example, robotic systems such as the da Vinci Surgical System enable surgeons to perform complex procedures with minimal error, translating to improved patient outcomes. [5,6].

Despite its advantages, MIS is not without challenges. The steep learning curve for surgeons, high costs of advanced equipment, and limited access in resource-constrained settings can impede widespread adoption. Additionally, not all patients are suitable candidates for MIS, requiring thorough evaluation to determine the most appropriate surgical approach. [7,8].

The future of MIS is bright, driven by ongoing innovations in medical technology and surgical techniques. Emerging fields such as augmented reality (AR) in surgery, artificial intelligence (AI)-guided interventions, and nanotechnology promise to further enhance the precision and accessibility of minimally invasive procedures. As these advancements become mainstream, the scope and impact of MIS are expected to expand, benefiting an even broader spectrum of patients. [9,10].

Conclusion

Minimally invasive surgery represents a paradigm shift in modern medicine, offering a safer, more efficient, and patient-centered approach to surgical care. As technology continues to advance, MIS will undoubtedly play an increasingly vital role in improving healthcare outcomes and setting new standards for surgical excellence.

 

References

 

  1. Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):159-171.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref

  2. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-697.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Court-Brown CM, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, et al. The changing epidemiology of fall-related fractures in adults. Injury. 2017;48(4):819-824.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Fares AB, Childs BR, Polmear MM, et al. Dorsal Bridge Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46(7):627.e1-627.e8.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Osada D, Viegas SF, Shah MA, et al. Comparison of different distal radius dorsal and volar fracture fixation plates: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(1):94-104.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Orbay JL, Touhami A. Current concepts in volar fixed-angle fixation of unstable distal radius fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:58-67.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Quadlbauer S, Pezzei C, Jurkowitsch J, et al.  Early Rehabilitation of Distal Radius Fractures Stabilized by Volar Locking Plate: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. J Wrist Surg. 2017;6(2):102-112.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Kreder HJ, Agel J, McKee MD, et al.. A randomized, controlled trial of distal radius fractures with metaphyseal displacement but without joint incongruity: closed reduction and casting versus closed reduction, spanning external fixation, and optional percutaneous K-wires. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(2):115-121.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Willis AA, Kutsumi K, Zobitz ME, et al. 3rd. Internal fixation of dorsally displaced fractures of the distal part of the radius. A biomechanical analysis of volar plate fracture stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2411-2417.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Sobky K, Baldini T, Thomas K, et al.. Biomechanical comparison of different volar fracture fixation plates for distal radius fractures. Hand (N Y). 2008;3(2):96-101.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

     

Get the App