Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Rapid Communication - Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine (2024) Volume 8, Issue 5

Mechanisms by Which Strength Training Contributes to Injury Prevention in Contact Sports.

Markrlik Dah*

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National University Medical School, Jeonju, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding Author:
Markrlik Dah
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
National University Medical School Jeonju,
Republic of Korea
E-mail:burmester.bk@e.ou

Received: 02-Sep-2024, Manuscript No.AAJPTSM-24-154508; Editor assigned: 04-Sep-2024, PreQC No. AAJPTSM-24-154508;(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Sep-2024, QC No AAJPTSM-24-154508; Revised: 21-Sep-2024, QC No AAJPTSM-24-154508; Published: 30- Sep-2024, DOI:10.35841/aajptsm-8.5.226

Citation: Dah M. Mechanisms by Which Strength Training Contributes to Injury Prevention in Contact Sports. J Phys Ther Sports Med. 2024; 8(5):226.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine

Abstract

  

Introduction

Contact sports, such as football, rugby, and hockey, are characterized by their high intensity and physical demands, which inherently increase the risk of injuries. Strength training has emerged as a crucial component in the prevention of these injuries. By enhancing muscle strength, joint stability, and overall physical resilience, strength training can significantly mitigate the risk of both acute and overuse injuries [1].

This essay explores the mechanisms by which strength training contributes to injury prevention in contact sports, detailing the physiological, biomechanical, and neuromuscular adaptations that underpin its effectiveness. Strength training induces muscle hypertrophy, increasing the cross-sectional area of muscle fibers. This enhancement in muscle size directly correlates with increased muscle strength, enabling athletes to better absorb and dissipate the forces encountered during contact sports Stronger muscles act as shock absorbers, reducing the strain on bones, tendons, and ligaments. Regular strength training enhances the stiffness and resilience of tendons, making them more capable of withstanding the high loads and rapid movements typical in contact sports [2].

Improved tendon properties reduce the likelihood of tendon injuries, such as tendinitis and tendinopathy. Strength training enhances the stability of joints by strengthening the muscles and connective tissues that support them. This is particularly crucial for joints that are frequently subjected to high stress in contact sports, such as the knees, shoulders, and ankles [3].

Enhanced joint stability reduces the risk of dislocations and ligament sprains. Proper strength training programs focus on correcting biomechanical imbalances and improving movement patterns. This leads to more efficient and safer execution of sport-specific movements, reducing the risk of injury due to poor mechanics. Proprioception, or the body’s ability to sense its position and movements in space, is crucial for maintaining balance and coordination. Strength training improves proprioceptive capabilities by enhancing the sensitivity and responsiveness of the neuromuscular system [4].

This heightened awareness helps athletes avoid awkward positions and movements that can lead to injury. Strength training enhances the speed and efficiency of muscle activation and coordination. This rapid response is essential in contact sports, where quick reactions are often needed to avoid or mitigate the impact of collisions. Eccentric exercises, where muscles lengthen under tension, are particularly effective for injury prevention [5].

These exercises strengthen muscles and tendons, making them more resistant to strain injuries. Eccentric training is beneficial for preventing injuries such as hamstring strains and Achilles tendon ruptures. Plyometric exercises, which involve explosive movements, enhance the power and responsiveness of muscles and tendons. This type of training improves the ability to generate and absorb force quickly, reducing the risk of injury during high-impact activities in contact sports [6].

A strong core is essential for maintaining stability and control during dynamic movements. Core strengthening exercises improve the stability of the spine and pelvis, reducing the risk of lower back injuries and enhancing overall athletic performance. Numerous studies have demonstrated that strength training significantly reduces the incidence of injuries in contact sports. For example, a study on collegiate football players found that those who participated in regular strength training programs had a lower incidence of musculoskeletal injuries compared to those who did not [7].

Strength training is also crucial in the rehabilitation process, helping athletes recover from injuries and prevent re-injury. Strengthening the injured area and correcting any muscle imbalances that may have contributed to the injury are key components of effective rehabilitation programs. Strength training not only enhances physical capabilities but also boosts psychological resilience. Athletes who feel physically strong and capable are more confident in their ability to perform and avoid injuries. This increased confidence can lead to more assertive and effective performance in contact sports. The discipline and perseverance required for consistent strength training can contribute to greater mental toughness [8].

This mental fortitude helps athletes cope with the physical and psychological demands of contact sports, reducing the likelihood of injury through stress and fatigue. Effective strength training programs for injury prevention should follow a periodized approach, with phases of varying intensity and focus. This ensures that athletes build strength progressively and avoid overtraining, which can lead to injury. Programs should be tailored to the specific demands of the sport and the individual athlete. This includes focusing on the muscle groups and movements most relevant to the sport, as well as addressing any unique injury risks associated with the athlete’s position or role. Incorporating functional movements that mimic sport-specific activities ensures that the strength gains translate effectively to performance and injury prevention in the sport context. Athletes vary in their response to strength training due to genetic, physiological, and psychological factors [9].

Personalized training programs that consider these individual differences are essential for maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risk of injury. While strength training is crucial, it should be balanced with flexibility and mobility exercises. Overemphasis on strength without adequate flexibility can lead to imbalances and increase the risk of injury. Regular monitoring of progress and adaptation of the training program based on the athlete’s response and feedback are essential for maintaining effectiveness and preventing overtraining [10].

Conclusion

Strength training is a fundamental component of injury prevention in contact sports, offering numerous physiological, biomechanical, and neuromuscular benefits. By enhancing muscle strength, joint stability, proprioception, and movement mechanics, strength training helps athletes withstand the demands of contact sports and reduces the risk of both acute and chronic injuries. Incorporating specific techniques such as eccentric and plyometric training, along with a periodized and sport-specific approach, further enhances the effectiveness of strength training programs. Despite the challenges and individual differences, the evidence strongly supports the role of strength training in safeguarding the health and performance of athletes in contact sports.

References

  1. Manning BT, Bohl DD, Saltzman BM, et al. Factors influencing patient selection of an orthopaedic sports medicine physician. Ortho J Sports Med. 2017;5(8):2325967117724415.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Seuser A, Boehm P, Kurme A. Orthopaedic issues in sports for persons with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2007;13:47-52.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Wiznia DH, Nwachuku E, Roth A, et al. The influence of medical insurance on patient access to orthopaedic surgery sports medicine appointments under the Affordable Care Act. Ortho J Sports Med. 2017;5(7):2325967117714140.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Yayac M, Javandal M, Mulcahey MK. Accredited orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship websites: An updated assessment of accessibility and content.Ortho J Sports Med. 2017;5(1):2325967116683942.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Dunn W, et al. Interobserver reliability of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears. The Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(5):926-32.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Blemker SS, Delp SL. Three-dimensional representation of complex muscle architectures and geometries. Ann of Biomed Engi. 2005;33(5):661-73.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Dostal WF, Andrews JG. A three-dimensional biomechanical model of hip musculature. J Biomechanics. 1981;14(11):803-12.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Hodge WA, Carlson KL, Fijan RS, et al. Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. JBJS. 1989;71(9):1378-86.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Krebs DE, Elbaum L, Riley PO, et al. Exercise and gait effects on in vivo hip contact pressures. Phys Ther. 1991;71(4):301-9.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Inman VT. Functional aspects of the abductor muscles of the hip. JBJS. 1947;29(3):607-19.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar

Get the App