Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2023) Volume 7, Issue 6

Long-Term Success and Survival Rates of Dental Implants: A Meta-Analysis

Nathan Bates*

Mayo Clinic, Ohio State University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Nathan Bates
Mayo Clinic
Ohio State University
USA
E-mail:nathan@bates.edu

Received:26-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-119655;Editor assigned:30-Oct-2023, PreQC No. AAOSR-23-119655(PQ); Reviewed:13-Nov-2023, QC No. AAOSR-23-119655; Revised:18-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-119655(R); Published:24-Nov-2023, DOI: 10.35841/ aaosr-7.6.173

Citation:Bates N. Long-Term Success and Survival Rates of Dental Implants: A Meta-Analysis.J Ortho Sur Reh.2023;7(6):173

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Introduction

Dental implants provide patients with a dependable way to replace lost teeth, revolutionising the restorative dentistry sector. When considering implant therapy, it is important for patients and physicians to know the long-term effectiveness and survival rates of dental implants. In order to offer a nuanced perspective on the parameters impacting implant longevity and the overall success of implant-supported restorations, this meta-analysis aims to thoroughly assess the research that is currently accessible.[1].

An extensive electronic database search was used to find research on the success and survival rates of dental implants during long follow-up times. A comprehensive quality assessment was carried out after studies with pertinent data were chosen based on inclusion criteria. The results of a few research were combined, and meta-analytic techniques were used to look into the variables related to implant success. After a long period of follow-up, the meta-analysis's results show that dental implants have a high overall survival rate. [2].

The placement, kind of implant, quality of the bone, and loading procedures were found to have an impact on the success rates. Mandibular implants showed somewhat better survival rates than maxillary implants. One important indicator of implant success was the quality of the bone at the implant site. Protocols for early and immediate loading showed similar success rates to those for conventional delayed loading. Dental implants provide a dependable and long-lasting tooth replacement option. The findings of this meta-analysis inform treatment choices and expectations by giving physicians and patients important information about the long-term viability of dental implants. When planning implant therapy, factors such implant type, placement, bone quality, and loading regimens that affect implant success should be carefully taken into account. Dental implants still have good long-term survival rates when patients are carefully chosen and their care is planned. [3].

The field of restorative dentistry has changed significantly as a result of dental implants being used to restore lost teeth. Patients looking to restore both function and appearance can find a reliable and long-lasting answer in dental implants. But for academics, physicians, and patients alike, knowing the long-term success and survival rates of dental implants is crucial. In order to offer a comprehensive understanding of the variables affecting implant longevity and the overall success of implant-supported restorations, this meta-analysis sets out on a thorough investigation of the body of literature that is now accessible. Since its start, dental implantology has seen substantial evolution with the creation of diverse implant designs, materials, and treatment regimens. The ability of dental implants to fuse with the surrounding bone and form a strong base for prosthetic restorations is essential to their clinical effectiveness. The dentistry community may benefit greatly from the accumulating long-term data on implant survival and success rates, as implant therapy has become a standard procedure. Dental implant long-term success is a complex idea that goes beyond simple implant survival.[4].

A functional restoration, the lack of peri-implantitis, implant stability, and patient satisfaction are all examples of success. An extensive understanding of the overall efficacy of restorations supported by implants can be obtained by evaluating these characteristics during prolonged follow-up times. This meta-analysis is important because it can help us better understand dental implantology and support evidence-based decision-making. Through investigating the variables that affect implant lifespan and success rates, we may improve treatment plans, establish reasonable expectations for patients, and solidify dental implants as a dependable and long-lasting tooth replacement option. This thorough meta-analysis sets the stage for understanding the long-term success and survival rates of dental implants by providing a methodical assessment of the existing data and insights that the dental community may benefit from.[5].

References

References

  1. Shin D, Hong SJ, Lee KW et al.Pro-inflammatory diet associated with low back pain in adults aged 50 and older.Appl Nurs Res. 2022;66:151589.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Elma Ö, Yilmaz ST, Deliens T, et al.Nutritional factors in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Unravelling the underlying mechanisms.Br J Anaesth. 2020 ;125(2):e231-3.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018;118(9):1591-602..

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Khorsha F, Mirzababaei A, Togha M et al. Association of drinking water and migraine headache severity.J Clin Neurosci. 2020;77:81-4.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Hébert JR, Shivappa N, Wirth MD et al.Perspective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII)—lessons learned, improvements made, and future directions.Adv Nutr. 2019 ;10(2):185-95.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al..Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447-92.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Strath LJ, Sims AM, Overstreet DS et al. Overstreet DS et al. Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is Associated with Movement-Evoked Pain Severity in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: Sociodemographic Differences.J Pain Res. 2022;23(8):1437-47.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Nijs J, Elma Ö, Yilmaz ST, et al Nutritional neurobiology and central nervous system sensitisation: Missing link in a comprehensive treatment for chronic pain?. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(5):539-43.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Wirth MD, Hébert JR, Shivappa N, et al Anti-inflammatory Dietary Inflammatory Index scores are associated with healthier scores on other dietary indices.Nutr Res . 2016 Mar 1;36(3):214-9.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Thompson FE, Subar AF.Dietary assessment methodology. Nutri Preven Treat Dis. 2017:5-48.
    11. Google Scholar

     

Get the App