Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Reach Us +44-7897-074717

Opinion Article - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2024) Volume 8, Issue 2

Legal frameworks for disease surveillance: balancing public health and privacy rights

Bell Cardwell *

Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

*Corresponding Author:
Bell Cardwell
Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ireland
E-mail: Ireland.E-mail: barbaracardwl@rcsi.ie

Received: 29-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130249; Editor assigned: 01- Mar -2024, PreQC No. AAPHPP-24-130249 (PQ); Reviewed:15- Mar-2024, QC No. AAPHPP-24-130249; Revised:19- Mar -2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130249 (R); Published:25- Mar -2024, DOI:10.35841/aara- aaphpp-8.2.224

Citation: Legal frameworks for disease surveillance: balancing public health and privacy rights. J Public Health Policy Plan .2024;8(2):224

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

    

 

Introduction

In the realm of public health, disease surveillance plays a crucial role in monitoring, detecting, and responding to outbreaks effectively. However, the implementation of robust disease surveillance systems often involves navigating a complex landscape of legal and ethical considerations, particularly concerning the balance between safeguarding public health and respecting individuals' privacy rights. As technology advances and global health threats continue to evolve, the development of appropriate legal frameworks becomes increasingly imperative to ensure that disease surveillance practices remain effective, ethical [1].

lawful.At the heart of discussions surrounding disease surveillance is the tension between the need for timely information to protect public health and the right to privacy guaranteed by various legal instruments and ethical principles. Legal frameworks governing disease surveillance must strike a delicate balance between these competing interests, ensuring that public health measures are both effective and respectful of individual rights [2].

One essential aspect of these legal frameworks is defining the scope of permissible surveillance activities. Laws and regulations should clearly outline the types of data that can be collected, the purposes for which they can be used, and the entities authorized to access and analyze such data. Transparency and accountability mechanisms are essential to maintain public trust and ensure that surveillance activities are conducted lawfully and ethically.Furthermore, legal frameworks must incorporate safeguards to protect individuals' privacy rights. [3].

These safeguards may include requirements for obtaining informed consent, anonymizing data to minimize the risk of re-identification, and implementing robust data security measures to prevent unauthorized access or misuse. Additionally, mechanisms for oversight and redress should be established to address any potential abuses of surveillance powers and protect individuals from unwarranted infringements on their privacy [3,4] . [4].

International human rights instruments, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), provide a foundation for developing legal frameworks that reconcile public health imperatives with privacy rights. These instruments recognize the right to privacy as a fundamental human right and impose limitations on the circumstances under which it may be lawfully restricted [5].

including for reasons of public health.Several landmark court cases have shaped the legal landscape surrounding disease surveillance and privacy rights. For example, the European Court of Human Rights' rulings in cases such as K.U. v. Finland and Zakharov v. Russia have established important principles regarding the proportionality of surveillance measures, the necessity of safeguards against arbitrary interference, and the importance of judicial oversight in protecting individuals' privacy rights [6].

Moreover, academic literature and policy analyses offer valuable insights into the legal and ethical dimensions of disease surveillance. Studies such as those by Gostin and Hodge (2016), Taylor et al. (2018), and Kass et al. (2018) explore the intersection of public health law, ethics, and human rights in the context of disease surveillance, providing guidance for policymakers and legal practitioners [7].

In addition to domestic legislation, international agreements and guidelines, such as the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), influence the legal frameworks governing disease surveillance in many countries. These instruments establish standards for data sharing, privacy protection, and cross-border cooperation in responding to public health emergencies while respecting individuals' rights to privacy and data protection [8].

As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, disease surveillance is a dynamic and evolving field that requires ongoing adaptation of legal frameworks to address emerging challenges. The rapid deployment of digital contact tracing apps and other technology-driven surveillance tools has raised concerns about data privacy, surveillance creep, and potential abuses of power. Effective legal frameworks must be agile enough to accommodate technological innovations while upholding fundamental rights and ethical principles [9].

As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, disease surveillance is a dynamic and evolving field that requires ongoing adaptation of legal frameworks to address emerging challenges. The rapid deployment of digital contact tracing apps and other technology-driven surveillance tools has raised concerns about data privacy, surveillance creep, and potential abuses of power. Effective legal frameworks must be agile enough to accommodate technological innovations while upholding fundamental rights and ethical principles [10].

conclusion

In conclusion, the development of robust legal frameworks for disease surveillance is essential to protect public health while respecting individuals' privacy rights. By striking a balance between the need for timely information and the imperative of privacy protection, these frameworks can ensure that surveillance activities are both effective and ethically sound. Through transparent governance, robust safeguards, and adherence to international human rights standards, legal systems can support the vital work of disease surveillance while upholding fundamental principles of justice and respect for human dignity.

References

  1. Pierce JD, Shen Q, Cintron SA,et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome. Nursing research. 2022;71(2):164-74.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Kamal M, Abo Omirah M, Hussein A,et al. Assessment and characterisation of post?COVID?19 manifestations. International journal of clinical practice. 2021;75(3):e13746.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Yong SJ. Long COVID or post-COVID-19 syndrome: putative pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatments. Infectious diseases. 2021;53(10):737-54.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Rudroff T, Fietsam AC, Deters JR,et al. Post-COVID-19 fatigue: potential contributing factors. Brain sciences. 2020;10(12):1012.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Zhao Y, Watterston J. The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Gasparotto M, Framba V, Piovella C,et al. Post-COVID-19 arthritis: a case report and literature review. Clinical rheumatology. 2021;40:3357-62.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Joli J, Buck P, Zipfel S,et al. Post-COVID-19 fatigue: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2022;13:947973.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic: an update post COVID?19 vaccines. Bioengineering & translational medicine. 2021;6(3):e10246.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Almeida F, Santos JD, Monteiro JA. The challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 World. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2020;48(3):97-103.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Barnes SJ. Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. International Journal of Information Management. 2020;55:102175.
    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Get the App