Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics (2024) Volume 8, Issue 3

Kidney Disease Management: Integrating Novel Research and Clinical Practice.

Kamlesh Khunti*

Department of Nephrology, Ningxia Medical University, China

*Corresponding Author:
Kamlesh Khunti
Department of Nephrology, Ningxia Medical University, Nigeria
Ningxia Medical University
Nigeria
E-mail:kamlesh@khunti.com

Received:03-Dec-2023,Manuscript No. AACNT-24-127529; Editor assigned:04-Dec-2023,PreQC No. AACNT-24-127529(PQ); Reviewed:18-Dec-2023,QC No. AACNT-24-127529; Revised:22-Dec-2023,Manuscript No. AACNT-24-127529(R); Published:31-Dec-2023,DOI: 10.35841/aacnt-8.3.205

Citation: Ma Y. Kidney Disease Management: Integrating Novel Research and Clinical Practice.. J Clin Nephrol Ther. 2023; 8(3):205

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Therapeutics

Introduction

Our study highlights the significance of customised treatment strategies for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including factors such as medication tolerance, comorbidities, and unique patient features. The selection of an antihypertensive drug ought to be customised to the individual's clinical profile, taking into account the beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system, renoprotective properties, and side effects linked to each medicine class.[1].

One of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus and the primary cause of end-stage renal disease globally is diabetic nephropathy, or DN. The advancement of diabetic neuropathic pain (DN) persists as a major clinical concern, despite improvements in the management of diabetes and its consequences. Innovative treatment modalities that focus on important pathogenic pathways in DN have surfaced as viable tactics to reduce the course of the illness and enhance results. The purpose of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to investigate how new treatments may be able to decrease the progression of DN. To find pertinent observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing new treatments for DN, a thorough search of electronic databases was undertaken. Included were studies looking into treatments for podocyte dysfunction, oxidative stress, fibrosis, inflammation, and renal hemodynamics. Information on the features, treatments, results, and side effects of the study. A common and dangerous consequence of diabetes mellitus is diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is characterised by increasing kidney damage that eventually results in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), albuminuria, and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Diabetes mellitus (DN) significantly increases morbidity and mortality rates in patients with the disease and places a financial strain on global healthcare systems. The advancement of DN continues to pose a substantial therapeutic challenge even with the current basic treatments focused on blood pressure management and glucose control. Therefore, in order to halt the progression of the disease and enhance outcomes, it is imperative to investigate novel therapeutic options that target important pathogenic pathways driving DN.[2].

Recent developments in our knowledge of the pathophysiology of DN have led to the identification of a number of putative treatment targets, including oxidative stress, fibrosis, inflammation, podocyte dysfunction, and aberrant renal hemodynamics. Various novel therapies, such as anti-inflammatory agents, antioxidants, antifibrotic agents, and agents targeting renal hemodynamics, have been developed to modulate these pathways and potentially halt or delay the progression of DN. Although some studies have examined the safety and effectiveness of these innovative treatments, a thorough analysis of the data supporting their ability to delay the advancement of DN is lacking. In order to close this gap, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the data from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of new treatments on the course of DN are conducted.[3].

Through an organised synthesis of the existing data, this research aims to tackle multiple important queries: In individuals with diabetic kidney disease, how effective are innovative therapies overall at lowering albuminuria and maintaining renal function? Do distinct patient demographics and classes of new treatments have varied treatment outcomes? What are these treatments' safety profiles with regard to adverse kidney events? The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will help to educate clinical practice and direct future research efforts in the management of this crippling condition by offering insightful information on the possible role of innovative therapeutics in slowing the progression of DN. Improving outcomes and quality of life for diabetic people at risk of DN development is the ultimate objective.[4].

To sum up, this systematic review and meta-analysis offer thorough insights into how new treatments can halt the advancement of diabetic nephropathy (DN). We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of treatments aimed at major pathogenic pathways implicated in DN by synthesising data from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). According to our research, cutting-edge treatments aimed at podocyte dysfunction, oxidative stress, fibrosis, inflammation, and renal hemodynamics may be able to delay the advancement of DN. In particular, when compared to traditional treatments, these medicines show considerable reductions in albuminuria and maintenance of renal function. Subgroup analyses underscore the significance of individualised treatment methods in the management of diabetic neuropathic pain by revealing variations in treatment outcomes across several types of new medicines and patient demographics.[5].

Conclusion

Overall, the results of this meta-analysis and systematic review highlight how crucial it is to investigate cutting-edge therapy strategies for the treatment of DN. These treatments have the ability to stop or slow the progression of the illness, lower the risk of end-stage renal disease, and enhance clinical outcomes for diabetic patients by focusing on the pathogenic pathways that underlie DN. Future studies should concentrate on examining the possibilities for combination medicines and individualised treatment plans, as well as verifying the safety and efficacy of innovative therapies in bigger, better-designed clinical trials. To ensure fair access for all DN patients, efforts should also be undertaken to address the cost and accessibility of innovative therapeutics. In summary, the results of this investigation add to the increasing corpus of information bolstering the importance to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of novel therapies in DN management, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes and quality of life for diabetic patients at risk of DN progression.

References

References

  1. Momeny M, Neshat AA, Hussain MA, et al . Learning-to-augment strategy using noisy and denoised data: Improving generalizability of deep CNN for the detection of COVID-19 in X-ray images. Comput Biol Med. 2021;136:104704.

    2. Indexed at, Google scholar , Cross ref

    1. Cardenas CE, Yang J, Anderson BM, et al. Advances in auto-segmentation. Semin radiat oncol. 2019;29(3): 185-197.

      2. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    2. Bhutani H, Smith V, Rahbari-Oskoui F, et al. A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging shows that kidney length predicts chronic kidney disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney int.2015; 88(1):146-51.

      3. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    3. Sigmund M, Ferstl R. Panel vector autoregression in R with the package panelvar. Q Rev Econ Finance. 2021; 80:693-720.

      4. Indexed at, Google scholar

    4. Hohmann E. Editorial commentary: Big data and machine learning in medicine. J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2022;38(3):848-9.

      5. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    5. Kistler AD, Poster D, Krauer F, et al. Increases in kidney volume in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease can be detected within 6 months. Kidney int. 2009;75(2):235-41.

      6. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    6. Bhutani H, Smith V, Rahbari-Oskoui F, et al. A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging shows that kidney length predicts chronic kidney disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney int. 2015;88(1):146-51.

      7. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    7. Yang X, Le Minh H, Cheng KT, et al. Renal compartment segmentation in DCE-MRI images. Med Image Anal. 2016;32:269-80.

      8. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    8. Bhutani H, Smith V, Rahbari-Oskoui F, et al. A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging shows that kidney length predicts chronic kidney disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney int. 2015;88(1):146-51.

      9. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

    9. Kistler AD, Poster D, Krauer F, et al. Increases in kidney volume in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease can be detected within 6 months. Kidney int. 2009;75(2):235-41.

      10. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

Get the App