Research in Clinical Dermatology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Rapid Communication - Research in Clinical Dermatology (2024) Volume 7, Issue 5

Interpreting Skin Biopsies: A Guide to Common Dermatopathological Findings

Beatriz Mendes *

Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Beatriz Mendes
Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo, Brazil
E-mail: beatriz.mendes@usp.br

Received: 2-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. aarcd-24-146529; Editor assigned: 4-Sep-2024, PreQC No. aarcd-24-146529 (PQ) Reviewed:18-Sep-2024, QC No. aarcd-24-146529Revised:25-Sep-2024,Manuscript No. aarcd-24-146529; Published:30-Sep-2024,DOI: 10.35841/aarcd- 7.5.223

Citation: Mendes B. Interpreting skin biopsies: A guide to common dermatopathological findings. Res Clin Dermatol. 2024;7(5):223

Visit for more related articles at Research in Clinical Dermatology

Introduction

Skin biopsies are a cornerstone of dermatopathology, providing crucial insights into a variety of skin conditions. Accurate interpretation of these biopsies is essential for diagnosing skin disorders and determining appropriate treatments. This article offers a comprehensive guide to some of the most common dermatopathological findings encountered in skin biopsies [1].

A skin biopsy involves the removal of a small sample of skin tissue for examination under a microscope. This procedure helps differentiate between benign and malignant conditions and can reveal information about inflammatory, infectious, or autoimmune skin diseases. Understanding the histopathological features observed in biopsies is key to making accurate diagnoses and guiding treatment [2].

Actinic keratosis is a precancerous skin lesion caused by prolonged sun exposure. Histologically, it is characterized by atypical keratinocytes in the epidermis, often with a hyperkeratotic and parakeratotic surface. The biopsy may show thickened stratum corneum and solar elastosis in the dermis. Actinic keratosis can progress to squamous cell carcinoma if left untreated [3].

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer. It typically presents as a nodular lesion with pearly borders. In biopsy samples, BCC is identified by nests or islands of basaloid cells in the dermis. These nests often show peripheral palisading and may invade surrounding tissues. Variants of BCC include nodular, superficial, and morphoeic types, each with distinct histological features [4].

Melanocytic nevi, or moles, are benign proliferations of melanocytes. On biopsy, they are characterized by clusters of melanocytes in the epidermis or dermis. Nevi can be categorized into congenital or acquired, and their architecture varies from junctional to compound or intradermal. Changes in the size, shape, or color of nevi can indicate malignancy, necessitating careful evaluation [5].

Melanoma is a malignant tumor of melanocytes and is one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer. Histologically, melanoma is characterized by asymmetrical, irregularly shaped nests of atypical melanocytes. The biopsy often reveals increased mitotic activity and a lack of maturation in deeper layers of the skin. Depth of invasion and ulceration are key factors in staging melanoma and determining prognosis [6].

Psoriasis is an autoimmune condition marked by hyperproliferation of keratinocytes. On biopsy, psoriasis is distinguished by acanthosis (thickened epidermis), elongated dermal papillae, and a conspicuous absence of the granular layer. The presence of Munro microabscesses (collections of neutrophils) and spongiform pustules are also characteristic features [7].

Lichen planus is an inflammatory skin condition that presents with purplish, itchy papules. Histologically, it is marked by a band-like infiltrate of lymphocytes at the dermal-epidermal junction, often associated with liquefactive degeneration of the basal cell layer. The "sawtooth" appearance of the epidermal-dermal junction is a hallmark feature [8].

Contact dermatitis results from exposure to irritants or allergens and is characterized by acute or chronic inflammation. Biopsy findings include spongiotic dermatitis, with edema of the epidermis and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis. The presence of eosinophils may suggest an allergic component [9].

Viral infections such as herpes simplex or verrucae (warts) can be identified through specific histopathological features. Herpes simplex virus infections often show multinucleated giant cells and intranuclear inclusions, while warts caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) exhibit koilocytic changes and papillomatosis in the epidermis [10].

Conclusion

The future of dermatopathology lies in integrating histopathological findings with molecular and genetic insights. Advances in genomic technologies and digital pathology are poised to revolutionize the field, offering more precise diagnostic tools and personalized treatment options. Staying abreast of these developments will be crucial for dermatopathologists in providing optimal patient care.By familiarizing yourself with these common findings and staying updated on new developments, you'll be better equipped to interpret skin biopsies accurately and effectively.

References

  1. Trotter MJ, Bruecks AK. Interpretation of skin biopsies by general pathologists: Diagnostic discrepancy rate measured by blinded review. Arch Path Lab. 2003;127(11):1489-92.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Keeling BH, Gavino AC, Gavino AC. Skin biopsy, the allergists’ tool: How to interpret a report. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:1-8.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Comfere NI, Peters MS, Jenkins S, et al. Dermatopathologists' concerns and challenges with clinical information in the skin biopsy requisition form: A mixed?methods study. J Cutan Pathol 2015;42(5):333-45.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Wong C, Peters M, Tilburt J, et al. Dermatopathologists’ opinions about the quality of clinical information in the skin biopsy requisition form and the skin biopsy care process: A semiqualitative assessment. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143(4):593-7.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Stevenson P, Rodins K. Improving diagnostic accuracy of skin biopsies. Aust J Gen 2018;47(4):216-20.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Trotter MJ, Au S, Naert KA. Practical strategies to improve the clinical utility of the dermatopathology report. Arch Path Lab. 2016;140(8):759-65.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Dunstan RW, Mauldin EA, Davenport GM, et al. A guide to taking skin biopsies: A pathologist’s perspective. Small Animal Dermatology Secrets. 2004:34-42.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Harvey NT, Chan J, Wood BA. Skin biopsy in the diagnosis of inflammatory skin disease. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46(5):283-8.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Pinson DM. Frustrations, requirements, and expectations of skin biopsy for diagnosing skin disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016;248(10):1112-4.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Carney PA, Frederick PD, Reisch LM, et al. Complexities of perceived and actual performance in pathology interpretation: A comparison of cutaneous melanocytic skin and breast interpretations. J Cutan Pathol. 2018;45(7):478-90.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App