Journal of Fisheries Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Perspective - Journal of Fisheries Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

Integrated Approaches to Fisheries Management in Transboundary Water Bodies

Emilia Korhonen*

Center for Sustainable Fisheries, University of Turku, Finland.

*Corresponding Author:
Emilia Korhonen
Center for Sustainable Fisheries
University of Turku, Finland.
E-mail: emilia.korhonen@utu.fi

Received: 03-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-157847; Editor assigned: 04-Feb-2025, PreQC No. AAJFR-25-157847(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Feb-2025, QC No AAJFR-25-157847; Revised: 21-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-157847(R); Published: 28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aajfr -9.1.253

Citation: Korhonen E. Integrated approaches to fisheries management in transboundary water bodies. J Fish Res. 2025;9(1):253.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries Research

Introduction

Integrated approaches to fisheries management in transboundary water bodies are essential for addressing the complex and shared challenges faced by countries with common water resources [1]. Transboundary water bodies, including rivers, lakes, and coastal areas, often span multiple national jurisdictions, making cooperation and coordination crucial for sustainable fisheries management. The interconnected nature of aquatic ecosystems, fish migration patterns, and environmental factors requires a holistic approach that integrates ecological, socio-economic, and governance considerations to ensure the long-term health and productivity of fisheries [2].

One of the primary challenges in managing fisheries in transboundary water bodies is the shared responsibility for resource conservation. Fish populations do not adhere to political borders, and species often migrate across countries, making unilateral management efforts ineffective [3]. As a result, countries must work together to establish shared management frameworks that consider the needs of the fishery, the ecosystem, and the communities dependent on it. This cooperation can take the form of bilateral or multilateral agreements, joint management committees, and regional fisheries organizations (RFOs) that provide a platform for collaboration [4].

An integrated approach involves aligning fisheries management with broader environmental and ecosystem considerations. For instance, managing water quality, addressing pollution, and protecting critical habitats such as wetlands, spawning grounds, and nursery areas are essential components of sustainable fisheries management [5]. Shared management plans should incorporate scientific data on fish populations, water quality, and ecosystem health to guide decision-making. This approach also requires monitoring and assessment systems that allow for data sharing across borders, providing a comprehensive understanding of the health of the fishery and facilitating evidence-based management decisions [6].

Socio-economic considerations play a crucial role in integrated fisheries management. Transboundary water bodies often support the livelihoods of communities in multiple countries, with fishers relying on the resources for food security and income. Ensuring equitable access to fisheries resources and considering the economic implications for local communities are important aspects of sustainable management [7]. The needs of small-scale fishers, who are often more vulnerable to environmental and market fluctuations, should be prioritized in decision-making processes. Collaborative efforts can help balance the interests of different sectors, including commercial fishing, aquaculture, tourism, and conservation [8].

Governance is a critical element of integrated fisheries management in transboundary water bodies. Effective governance structures must facilitate cooperation and coordination between different countries, stakeholders, and sectors. Transparent decision-making processes, inclusive stakeholder participation, and clear legal frameworks are necessary for ensuring compliance and resolving conflicts. Regional governance bodies, such as the Commission for the Conservation and Management of Fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific or the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, demonstrate the importance of creating institutions that can manage shared resources across borders. These institutions should be empowered to implement regulations, enforce agreements, and monitor compliance [9].

Adaptive management is another key aspect of an integrated approach to fisheries management. Ecosystems and fish populations are dynamic and influenced by multiple factors, including climate change, habitat loss, and overfishing. As such, fisheries management must be flexible and able to adapt to changing conditions. This requires regular monitoring, stakeholder feedback, and the capacity to adjust management measures as new information becomes available. Adaptive management helps ensure that fisheries management strategies remain effective over time, even in the face of uncertainty and environmental change [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, integrated approaches to fisheries management in transboundary water bodies are critical for addressing the complex, cross-border challenges of sustaining fish populations and supporting the livelihoods of dependent communities. Successful collaboration between countries, stakeholders, and governance bodies is necessary to ensure that fishery resources are managed sustainably and equitably. By considering ecological, socio-economic, and governance factors, countries can work together to protect shared water bodies, promote regional cooperation, and safeguard the future of fisheries for all who depend on them.

References

  1. Lehodey P, Senina I, Murtugudde R. A spatial ecosystem and populations dynamics model (SEAPODYM)–Modeling of tuna and tuna-like populations. Prog Oceanogr. 2008;78(4):304-18.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Lehodey P, Chai F, Hampton J. Modelling climate-related variability of tuna populations from a coupled ocean–biogeochemical-populations dynamics model. Fish Oceanogr. 2003;12(4-5):483-94.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Hampton J, Sibert JR, Kleiber P, et al. Decline of Pacific tuna populations exaggerated?. Nature. 2005;434(7037):E1-2.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Murua H, Rodriguez-Marin E, Neilson JD, et al. Fast versus slow growing tuna species: age, growth, and implications for population dynamics and fisheries management. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2017;27:733-73.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Juan-Jordá MJ, Mosqueira I, Cooper AB, et al. Global population trajectories of tunas and their relatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(51):20650-5.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Silas EG, Pillai PP, Srinath M, et al. Population dynamics of tunas: stock assessment. CMFRI Bulletin. 1985;36:20-7.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Bertignac M, Lehodey P, Hampton J. A spatial population dynamics simulation model of tropical tunas using a habitat index based on environmental parameters. Fish Oceanogr. 1998;7(3-4):326-34.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Griffiths SP, Leadbitter D, Willette D, et al. Longtail tuna, Thunnus tonggol (Bleeker, 1851): a global review of population dynamics, ecology, fisheries, and considerations for future conservation and management. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2020;30(1):25-66.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Lehodey P, Senina I, Calmettes B, et al. Modelling the impact of climate change on Pacific skipjack tuna population and fisheries. Climatic change. 2013;119:95-109.

    10. Google Scholar

  10. Lehodey P. The pelagic ecosystem of the tropical Pacific Ocean: dynamic spatial modelling and biological consequences of ENSO. Prog Oceanogr. 2001;49(1-4):439-68.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App