Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Perspective - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 4

Innovative Radiation Therapy Techniques: Enhancing Patient Outcomes

Masatake Onodera *

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University, Japan

*Corresponding Author:
Masatake Onodera
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University, Japan
E-mail: Masatake.o@med.hokudai.ac.jp

Received: 01-Aug -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-144183; Editor assigned: 02-Aug-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-144183 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Aug-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-144183; Revised:21-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-144183 (R); Published:30-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.4.224

Citation: Onodera M., Innovative radiation therapy techniques: Enhancing patient outcomes. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(4):224

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

Radiation therapy remains a cornerstone in the treatment of cancer, evolving significantly with advancements in technology and technique. This article explores the innovative approaches in radiation therapy that have enhanced patient outcomes, focusing on precision, efficacy, and safety. By integrating new technologies and methodologies, modern radiation therapy is increasingly personalized, targeting tumors more effectively while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues [1].

Radiation therapy has been used for over a century, with initial treatments involving broad, imprecise radiation beams. Over time, advancements in imaging, physics, and computing have led to more precise and effective radiation techniques. Early approaches such as conventional X-ray therapy have evolved into sophisticated techniques that improve outcomes and reduce side effects [2].

Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) represents a major leap forward in precision. IGRT utilizes advanced imaging technologies to visualize the tumor and surrounding tissues before and during treatment. This allows for real-time adjustments to radiation delivery, ensuring that the tumor receives the optimal dose while minimizing exposure to healthy tissues [3].

CT and MRI scans are employed to obtain detailed images of the tumor's location and size, helping to refine the treatment plan and adjust for any changes in tumor position or size. 4D imaging takes into account the movement of tumors, especially in areas like the lungs and abdomen where breathing can affect tumor position. This technique allows for accurate targeting of moving tumors by incorporating real-time movement data [4].

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a technique that delivers highly focused radiation beams to a tumor from multiple angles, providing a high dose of radiation in fewer sessions compared to conventional therapy. This approach is particularly effective for small, well-defined tumors, including those in the lungs, liver, and spine [5].

SBRT's precision minimizes the dose to surrounding healthy tissues, reducing side effects and allowing for treatment of tumors that are inoperable or difficult to reach. It often results in shorter treatment courses and improved patient convenience [6].

This involves adjusting the treatment plan based on changes in tumor size or position observed during the course of therapy. Adaptive radiation therapy further enhances the precision of SBRT by accommodating changes in the tumor and surrounding anatomy [7].

Proton therapy is an advanced form of radiation therapy that uses protons rather than X-rays to treat cancer. Protons have a unique advantage due to their physical properties, which allow them to deliver their maximum dose at a specific depth, known as the Bragg peak. This results in high doses to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissue [8].

While proton therapy offers significant benefits, its availability is limited by the high cost and complexity of proton therapy facilities. Ongoing research aims to make this technique more accessible and cost-effective. Proton therapy is particularly beneficial for treating tumors located near critical structures, such as the brain or spinal cord, and in pediatric patients where reducing radiation exposure to healthy tissues is crucial [9].

Brachytherapy involves placing a radioactive source directly within or very close to the tumor, delivering high doses of radiation locally. This method is commonly used for cancers of the prostate, breast, and cervix. Brachytherapy can be classified into: Radioactive sources are implanted directly into the tumor or surrounding tissue, providing targeted treatment with minimal impact on adjacent healthy tissue [10].

Conclusion

Innovative radiation therapy techniques have significantly enhanced patient outcomes by improving the precision, efficacy, and safety of cancer treatment. Advances such as IGRT, SBRT, proton therapy, and brachytherapy have revolutionized how radiation is delivered, offering patients better-targeted treatments with fewer side effects. As the field continues to evolve, emerging technologies and interdisciplinary approaches promise even greater advancements, further improving the landscape of cancer care and patient well-being.

References

  1. Purdy JA. Dose to normal tissues outside the radiation therapy patient’s treated volume: a review of different radiation therapy techniques. Health Phys. 2008;95(5):666-76.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Goyal S, Kataria T. Image guidance in radiation therapy: techniques and applications. Radiol Res Pract. 2014;2014(1):705604.

    3. Google Scholar

  3. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(3):193.

    4. Google Scholar

  4. Gerber DE, Chan TA. Recent advances in radiation therapy. Am Fam Phys. 2008;78(11):1254-62.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Palma DA, Verbakel WF, Otto K, Senan S. New developments in arc radiation therapy: a review. Cancer treat Rev. 2010;36(5):393-9.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Do Huh H, Kim S. History of radiation therapy technology. Prog Medi Phys. 2020;31(3):124-34.

    7. Google Scholar

  7. Brahme A. Development of radiation therapy optimization. Acta Oncol. 2000;39(5):579-95.

    8. Google Scholar

  8. Xing L, Thorndyke B, Schreibmann E, Yang Y, Li TF, Kim GY, Luxton G, Koong A. Overview of image-guided radiation therapy. Med Dosimet. 2006;31(2):91-112.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Schulz?Ertner D, Nikoghosyan A, Didinger B, Münter M, Jäkel O, Karger CP, Debus J. Therapy strategies for locally advanced adenoid cystic carcinomas using modern radiation therapy techniques. Cancer: Interdisplin Int J Am Cancer Soc. 2005;104(2):338-44.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Brahme A. Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. Radiother Oncol. 1988;12(2):129-40.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App