Review Paper - Biomedical Research (2017) Volume 28, Issue 14

How can we judge sympathetic denervation from the external manifestation in the human skin?

¹The Graduate School of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China

²Department of Plastic Surgery, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, PR China

³The Graduate School of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China

⁴Center of Wound Treatment, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, PR China

⁵The Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Tissue Repair of Tropical Area, PLA, Guangzhou, PR China

*Corresponding Author:

Biao Cheng
The Graduate School of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, PR China

Accepted date: June 20, 2017

Abstract

Sympathetic denervation is associated with many diseases. Most cutaneous external monitoring indicators are non-invasive and used widely in clinical medicine. The external monitoring indicators of sympathetic denervation are reviewed to facilitate the clinical diagnosis of sympathetic diseases and the results of sympathectomy. Useful indicators of sympathetic denervation include sweating, warm skin, increased blood flow, Electrodermal Activity (EDA), pain response, skin integrity, and skin wrinkling. Sympathetic denervation can be assessed simply and accurately using many external indicators to diagnose sympathetic-related diseases or evaluate the effectiveness, complications, and prognosis of sympathectomy.

Keywords

Skin physiological phenomena, Sympathectomy, Health status indicators, Skin diseases.

Introduction

Sympathetic denervation is associated with many diseases. Sympathetic neuropathy is frequent in diabetic patients and reflects the severity of diabetes [1]. Patients with a spinal cord injury [1] or Parkinson’s disease [2] may have symptoms of sympathetic denervation. Many localized lesions, such as diabetic foot [3], limb ischemia [4], Raynaud’s disease [5], hyperhidrosis [6], and limb pain [7] are also closely related to the functions of the sympathetic nerve system. Surgical sympathectomy is an effective method for treating these localized lesions [8,9]. Skin sympathetic nerve activity is attenuated in aged human skin during hyperthermia [10]. External monitoring indicators of sympathetic denervation will facilitate the clinical diagnosis of sympathetic diseases and the results of sympathectomy.

The skin is the largest and most superficial organ of the body. The function of the skin also changes after sympathetic denervation. Most cutaneous external monitoring indicators are non-invasive and widely used in clinical medicine. This article reviews cutaneous external monitoring indicators of sympathetic denervation.

Sweating

Apocrine and eccrine sweat glands are innervated by the sympathetic nervous system. The sudomotor system is also controlled by sympathetic neurons. An iodine starch reaction is often used to observe the appearance of sweat spots and evaluate areas wetted by sweat. Some experts believe that the sweat spot test seems to be a more sensitive indicator than the commonly used cardiovascular tests in the observation of diabetic autonomic neuropathy [11].

After the removal or destruction of sympathetic trunks, sweating on the skin is reduced in more than 50% of patients (Table 1). However, 58.8% may develop Compensatory Sweating (CS) for a few months after a sympathectomy [6]. CS is the most common and serious complication of sympathectomy and often causes sweating on just one part of the body.

Table 1: Changes in skin sweating after sympathetic denervation.

Skin Temperature

In humans, skin temperature is closely related to the production of sweat. A reduction in sweating decreases heat dissipation and consequently contributes to increased skin temperature. Intraoperative or postoperative monitoring of the change in skin temperature is used to guide surgeons performing sympathectomy, although skin temperature is also affected by surgical procedures (Table 2). The temperature of areas of skin dominated by sympathetic trunks will rise temporarily after sympathetic denervation, although the amplitude and duration of the temperature increase can differ. Successful sympathetic resection is indicated by an intraoperative increase in skin temperature exceeding 1°C. There are significant correlations between the range of postoperative CS and increases in temperature and blood flow [12].

Table 2: Skin temperature changes after sympathetic denervation.

However, the sensitivity of skin temperature monitoring is poor. Skin temperature is also affected by room temperature and the surgical procedure used. The removal of a unilateral sympathetic trunk increases ipsilateral skin temperature but does not increase or even decreases the contralateral skin temperature. Beginning approximately 1 w postsympathectomy, skin temperature gradually returns to normal.

Skin Blood Flow

Sympathetic innervation is distributed heterogeneously in the blood vessels. After sympathetic denervation, the blood vessels will dilate in the skin dominated by sympathetic nerves. Increased blood supply is also one of the main causes of increases in skin temperature. Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow may be useful for assessing sympathectomy (Table 3). Laser Doppler flowmetry is an excellent non-invasive technique for measuring cutaneous microcirculation.

Table 3: Skin blood flow changes after sympathetic denervation.

The degree of change in the blood flow exceeds that of the temperature. The time to the peak blood flow is more rapid than that to the peak temperature after sympathectomy [13]. Skin blood flow should be a faster, more reliable indication of sympathectomy than temperature. Patients with congenitally absent sweat glands have no active cutaneous vasodilation [14].

Electrodermal Activity

Electrodermal Activity (EDA) includes all electrical phenomena of the skin, and these are measured using skin potential, skin resistance, skin conductance, skin impedance, and skin admittance. A Galvanic skin reflex monitor can also be used to observe skin resistance, which is related to sweating and sympathetic nerves. Thoracic sympathetic blockade results in a significant increase in skin resistance [15]. The Sympathetic Skin Response (SSR) is the momentary change in the electrical potential of the skin, potentially generated by sweat in response to different stimuli.

SSR is used to assess sympathetic nerve function (Table 4). The amplitude of the SSR waveform tends to increase and several consecutive waves can be observed in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis [16]. The SSR waveforms abolished following a sympathectomy are restored gradually in palmar hyperhidrosis patients [17]. Intraoperative plantar skin temperature and perioperative SSR are correlated with these changes [18]. However, the SSR is not fully consistent with sudomotor dysfunction [19]. SSR outcomes are reliable but not stable indicators of spinal cord injury.

Table 4: Sympathetic skin response changes after sympathetic denervation.

Others

Some other changes in the functions of skin are also associated with sympathetic nerves (Table 5). Sympathetic blockade can reduce sympathetic activity and pain, because sympathetic activity and catecholamines can activate primary afferent nociceptors. The integrity of the skin is also associated with sympathetic nerves. Patients with severe diabetes have dry, fissured skin [20]. Horner’s syndrome comprises the triad of unilateral miosis, ptosis, and ipsilateral facial anhidrosis [21].

Table 5: Other changes in the functions of skin after sympathetic denervation.

Skin wrinkling upon water immersion is a traditional method of observing peripheral sympathetic nerve activity. Skin wrinkling is stimulated by vasoconstriction through the loss of digit volume. After sympathetic blockade, skin wrinkling is reduced. The wrinkle test is more sensitive than the iodine starch test [22]. The improved wrinkle test replaces water with a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics and is a routine diagnostic test of sympathetic function [23].

Conclusions

The external indicators of sympathetic denervation in the human skin include sweating, skin temperature, blood flow, EDA, pain response, integrity of the skin, and skin wrinkling. Sympathetic denervation results in reduced sweating, as assessed with an iodine starch reaction, in more than 50% of patients. Laser Doppler flowmetry can show increased skin blood flow after a sympathectomy. The temperature of skin dominated by sympathetic nerves will rise temporarily after sympathetic denervation, although the amplitude and duration of the temperature increase differ. Skin blood flow is a faster, more reliable indication of sympathectomy than temperature. EDA can be measured using skin potential, skin resistance, skin conductance, skin impedance, and skin admittance. The amplitudes of the sympathetic skin response waveforms decrease after sympathetic denervation. Sympathetic blockade can reduce pain and skin wrinkling. Sympathetic denervation can be assessed simply and accurately using many external indicators when we want to diagnose sympathetic-related diseases or evaluate the effectiveness, complications, and prognosis after sympathectomy. Multifunction devices that can monitor many indicators at one time should be developed for sympathetic monitoring.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.81171812 and NO.81272105), the National Basic Science and Development Program (NO. 2012CB518105), Health and Medical Treatment Collaborative Innovation Major Special Projects of Guangzhou (NO. 201508020253) and Science and Technology key Project of Guangdong province (NO.2014B020212010).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Lee JS, Fang SY, Roan JN, Jou IM, Lam CF. Spinal cord injury enhances arterial expression and reactivity of alpha1-adrenergic receptors-mechanistic investigation into autonomic dysreflexia. Spine J N Am Soc 2016; 16: 65-71.
2. Siepmann T, Frenz E, Penzlin AI, Goelz S, Zago W, Friehs I. Pilomotor function is impaired in patients with Parkinsons disease: A study of the adrenergic axon-reflex response and autonomic functions. Parkinson Relat Disord 2016; 31: 129-134.
3. Faerman I, Faccio E, Calb I, Razumny J, Franco N, Dominguez A. Autonomic neuropathy in the skin: a histological study of the sympathetic nerve fibres in diabetic anhidrosis. Diabetologia 1982; 22: 96-99.
4. Stumpflen A, Ahmadi A, Attender M, Gschwandtner M, Hofmann S, Maca T. Effects of transvenous regional guanethidine block in the treatment of critical finger ischemia. Angiology 2000; 51: 115-122.
5. Thune TH, Ladegaard L, Licht PB. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for Raynauds phenomenon-a long term follow-up study. Eur J Soc Vasc Surg 2006; 32: 198-202.
6. Ng I, Yeo TT. Palmar hyperhidrosis: intraoperative monitoring with laser Doppler blood flow as a guide for success after endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 127-30; discussion 30-31.
7. Alexander C, Dulebohn S. Lumbar Sympathetic Block. Stat Pearls Treasure Island (FL) 2017.
8. Bale R. Ganglion block. When and how?. Radiologe 2015; 55: 886-895.
9. Burbelko M, Wagner HJ, Gutberlet M, Grothoff M. Image-guided pain therapy. Sympathicolysis. Der Radiologe 2015; 55: 462-469.
10. Stanhewicz AE, Greaney JL, Alexander LM, Kenney WL. Blunted increases in skin sympathetic nerve activity are related to attenuated reflex vasodilation in aged human skin. J Appl Physiol 2016; 121: 1354-1362.
11. Ryder RE, Marshall R, Johnson K, Ryder AP, Owens DR, Hayes TM. Acetylcholine sweatspot test for autonomic denervation. Lancet 1988; 1: 1303-1305.
12. Fujita T, Mano M, Nishi H, Shimizu N. Intraoperative prediction of compensatory sweating for thoracic sympathectomy. Jap J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai zasshi 2005; 53: 481-485.
13. Eisenach JH, Pike TL, Wick DE, Dietz NM, Fealey RD, Atkinson JL. A comparison of peripheral skin blood flow and temperature during endoscopic thoracic sympathotomy. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 269-276.
14. Brengelmann GL, Freund PR, Rowell LB, Olerud JE, Kraning KK. Absence of active cutaneous vasodilation associated with congenital absence of sweat glands in humans. Am J Physiol 1981; 240: 571-575.
15. Uchino H, Sasaki S, Miura H, Hirabayashi G, Nishiyama T, Ohta T. Usefulness of galvanic skin reflex monitor in CT-guided thoracic sympathetic blockade for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Anesth 2007; 21: 403-408.
16. Lefaucheur JP, Fitoussi M, Becquemin JP. Abolition of sympathetic skin responses following endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19: 581-586.
17. Lewis DR, Irvine CD, Smith FC, Lamont PM, Baird RN. Sympathetic skin response and patient satisfaction on long-term follow-up after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15: 239-243.
18. Chen HJ, Liang CL, Lu K. Associated change in plantar temperature and sweating after transthoracic endoscopic T2-3 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Neurosurg 2001; 95: 58-63.
19. Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basic mechanisms and clinical applications. J Clin Autonom Res Soc 2003; 13: 256-270.
20. Sun PC, Lin HD, Jao SH, Ku YC, Chan RC, Cheng CK. Relationship of skin temperature to sympathetic dysfunction in diabetic at-risk feet. Diab Res Clin Pract 2006; 73: 41-46.
21. Darvall JN, Morsi AW, Penington A. Coexisting harlequin and Horner syndromes after paediatric neck dissection: a case report and a review of the literature. J Plast Reconstruct Aesth Surg 2008; 61: 1382-1384.
22. Vasudevan TM, van Rij AM, Nukada H, Taylor PK. Skin wrinkling for the assessment of sympathetic function in the limbs. Aus New Zealand J Surg 2000; 70: 57-59.
23. Wilder-Smith EP. Stimulated skin wrinkling as an indicator of limb sympathetic function. Int Feder Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126: 10-16.
24. Lai YT, Yang LH, Chio CC, Chen HH. Complications in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis treated with transthoracic endoscopic sympathectomy. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 110-113; discussion 3-5.
25. Drott C, Claes G, Olsson-Rex L, Dalman P, Fahlen T, Gothberg G. Successful treatment of facial blushing by endoscopic transthoracic sympathicotomy. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 639-643.
26. Di Filippo A, Natale V, Del Po F, Ciapetti M, Bressan F, Falchi S. Skin temperature during sympathetic block: a clinical comparison of bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.75%. Anaesth Intens Care 2006; 34: 334-337.
27. Lu K, Liang CL, Cho CL, Cheng CH, Yen HL, Rau CS. Patterns of palmar skin temperature alterations during transthoracic endoscopic T2 sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Autonom Neurosci Basic Clin 2000; 86: 99-106.
28. Jeong SM, Kim TY, Jeong YB, Sim JY, Choi IC. The changes of skin temperature on hands and feet during and after T3 sympathicotomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Kor Med Sci 2006; 21: 917-921.
29. Kao MC, Tsai JC, Lai DM, Hsiao YY, Lee YS, Chiu MJ. Autonomic activities in hyperhidrosis patients before, during, and after endoscopic laser sympathectomy. Neurosurgery 1994; 34: 262-268; discussion 8.
30. Wasner G, Schattschneider J, Baron R. Skin temperature side differences-a diagnostic tool for CRPS? Pain 2002; 98: 19-26.
31. Kruse CA. Thirty year experience with predictive lumbar sympathectomy. Method for selection of patients. Am J Surg 1985; 150: 232-236.
32. Crandall CG, Meyer DM, Davis SL, Dellaria SM. Palmar skin blood flow and temperature responses throughout endoscopic sympathectomy. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 277-283.
33. Hatangdi VS, Boas RA. Lumbar sympathectomy: a single needle technique. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 285-289.
34. Hubli M, Krassioukov AV. How reliable are sympathetic skin responses in subjects with spinal cord injury? J Clin Autonom Res Soc 2015; 25: 117-124.
35. Cross FW, Cotton LT. Chemical lumbar sympathectomy for ischemic rest pain. A randomized, prospective controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg 1985; 150: 341-345.
36. Choi E, Cho CW, Kim HY, Lee PB, Nahm FS. Lumbar sympathetic block with botulinum toxin type b for complex regional pain syndrome: a case study. Pain Phys 2015; 18: 911-916.