Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Commentary - Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2024) Volume 7, Issue 3

Genetic Testing: Ethical and Legal Considerations in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer DNA Testing

Olivia Thompson *

Department of Genetic Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Olivia Thompson
Department of Genetic Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Canada
E-mail: othompson@utoronto.ca

Received:02-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. AABB-24-140361; Editor assigned:04-Jun-2024, PreQC No. AABB-24-140361 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Jun-2024, QC No. AABB-24-140361; Revised:22-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. AABB-24-140361 (R); Published:30-Jun-2024, DOI:10.35841/aabb-7.3.205

Citation: Thompson O. Genetic Testing: Ethical and Legal Considerations in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer DNA Testing. J Biochem Biotech 2024; 7(3):205

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Introduction

The advent of direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA testing has revolutionized access to genetic information. Companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA offer tests that provide insights into ancestry, health risks, and personal traits. While these services democratize genetic information, they also raise significant ethical and legal concerns. This article explores these considerations, emphasizing the importance of informed consent, privacy, data security, and the implications for healthcare. DTC genetic testing has surged in popularity, providing individuals with easy access to their genetic data without requiring a healthcare provider's intermediary. These tests typically involve collecting a saliva sample and sending it to a laboratory for analysis. The results can reveal information about ancestry, predisposition to certain diseases, and even physical and behavioral traits. While the accessibility of these tests is appealing, it also leads to potential misinterpretations and misuse of genetic information [1,2].

A critical ethical issue in DTC genetic testing is informed consent. Consumers must understand what they are consenting to, including the scope of the information provided and its potential implications. Many individuals lack the background to fully comprehend the complex genetic data they receive. This gap can lead to misinterpretation of results, causing unnecessary anxiety or false reassurance. Ensuring that consumers have access to genetic counseling and clear, comprehensible information is crucial for informed decision-making. Privacy is a paramount concern with DTC genetic testing. Genetic data is highly sensitive, and its unauthorized access or misuse can have serious consequences. Consumers must be aware of how their genetic information will be stored, used, and shared. Companies often retain the right to use genetic data for research or to share it with third parties. Ensuring robust data protection measures and transparency about data usage policies is essential to safeguard consumer privacy [3,4].

The security of genetic data is another critical issue. Cybersecurity breaches can lead to the exposure of sensitive information, potentially resulting in identity theft, discrimination, or other harms. The storage and transfer of genetic data must be secured using advanced encryption and cybersecurity measures. Companies must be accountable for protecting this information against unauthorized access and cyber threats. The potential for genetic discrimination is a significant legal and ethical concern. Employers or insurance companies could potentially use genetic information to discriminate against individuals based on their predisposition to certain diseases. In some countries, laws such as the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) in the United States protect against such discrimination [5,6].

Receiving genetic information can have profound psychological effects. Learning about a predisposition to a serious disease can cause significant distress and anxiety. Conversely, negative results might lead to a false sense of security, disregarding other risk factors such as lifestyle and environment. Providing access to genetic counseling can help individuals understand and cope with the emotional impact of their genetic information [7].

DTC genetic testing can influence healthcare decisions, but the clinical validity and utility of some tests remain controversial. While some genetic tests provide medically actionable information, others do not have clear clinical relevance. Consumers might make health decisions based on incomplete or misunderstood information. Healthcare providers should guide patients in interpreting test results and integrating them into their overall health management. Many DTC companies use aggregated genetic data for research purposes, which can drive scientific discoveries. However, ethical concerns arise regarding consent and the use of genetic data without explicit consumer permission. Transparent policies and obtaining explicit consent for the use of genetic data in research are necessary to maintain trust and ethical standards in research practices [8,9].

The rapid growth of the DTC genetic testing market has outpaced the development of comprehensive regulatory and legal frameworks. Regulatory bodies must establish guidelines to ensure the accuracy, validity, and reliability of these tests. Additionally, laws protecting consumer rights and privacy need to be updated to reflect the evolving landscape of genetic testing. A coordinated effort among policymakers, industry leaders, and healthcare professionals is essential to create a robust regulatory environment [10].

Conclusion

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing offers exciting opportunities for individuals to learn about their genetics and health. However, it also brings significant ethical and legal challenges that must be addressed to protect consumers. Ensuring informed consent, safeguarding privacy and data security, preventing genetic discrimination, and providing psychological support are crucial components of responsible genetic testing. As the field continues to evolve, developing comprehensive regulatory and ethical frameworks will be essential to harness the benefits of genetic testing while minimizing its risks.

 

References

  1. Wolf SM. Return of research results: what about the family?. JL Med Ethics. 2015;43(3):437-9.

    2. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Lin JC, Hsiao WW, Fan CT. Managing “incidental findings” in biobank research: Recommendations of the Taiwan biobank. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019;17:1135-42.

    3. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Roberts JS, Ostergren J. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and personal genomics services: a review of recent empirical studies. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2013;1:182-200.

    4. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Christenhusz GM, Devriendt K, Dierickx K. Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(10):529-40.

    5. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Erlich Y, Narayanan A. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nat Rev Gen. 2014;15(6):409-21.

    6. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Phillips AM. Only a click away—DTC genetics for ancestry, health, love… and more: A view of the business and regulatory landscape. Appl Transl Genomics. 2016;8:16-22.

    7. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Souzeau E, Burdon KP, Mackey DA. Ethical considerations for the return of incidental findings in ophthalmic genomic research. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(1):3-.

    8. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Gniady JA. Regulating direct-to-consumer genetic testing: protecting the consumer without quashing a medical revolution. L Rev. 2007;76:2429.

    9. Indexed at, Google scholar

  9. Clayton EW, Evans BJ, Hazel JW, Rothstein MA. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations. J Law Biosci. 2019;6(1):1-36.

    10. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Erdmann P. Incidental findings–ethical aspects. 2017:9-24.

    11. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App