Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Short Communication - Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4

Genetic mapping and QTL analysis in improving crop yield.

Ian M. Thompson *

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Reading, UK

*Corresponding Author:
Ian M. Thompson
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Reading, UK
E-mail: i.m.thompson@reading.ac.uk

Received: 25-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AAASCB-24-144059; Editor assigned: 27-Jul-2024, PreQC No. AAASCB-24-144059; Reviewed:10-Aug-2024, QC No. AAASCB-24-144059; Revised:16-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAASCB-24-144059; Published:22-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/ aaascb-8.4.250

Citation: M. Thompson I. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis in improving crop yield. J Agric Sci Bot. 2023; 8(4):250

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany

Introduction

Genetic mapping and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis have become foundational tools in plant breeding and crop improvement, offering critical insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits, including crop yield. As the global population continues to rise, so does the demand for increased agricultural productivity. Enhancing crop yield is a top priority for ensuring food security, and understanding the genetic basis of yield-related traits is essential for developing higher-yielding crop varieties. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis provide a pathway to identify the specific regions of the genome that influence these traits, enabling targeted breeding strategies [1].

Crop yield is a complex trait influenced by multiple genetic and environmental factors, making it challenging to improve through traditional breeding methods alone. Unlike simple Mendelian traits, which are controlled by a single gene, yield-related traits are typically quantitative, meaning they are controlled by multiple genes, each contributing a small effect. These genes, known as QTLs, interact with each other and with the environment to determine the final yield outcome. Understanding the genetic basis of these interactions is crucial for effective crop improvement [2].

The process of genetic mapping involves the identification of genetic markers that are associated with specific traits, allowing researchers to locate the regions of the genome responsible for those traits. These markers can be DNA sequences that are polymorphic, meaning they vary between individuals and are linked to the traits of interest. By analyzing the co-segregation of these markers with the trait in a mapping population, researchers can create a genetic map that pinpoints the chromosomal locations of QTLs associated with yield and other agronomic traits [3].

QTL analysis builds upon genetic mapping by quantifying the contribution of each identified QTL to the overall phenotypic variation in a trait. This involves statistical methods that estimate the effect size, direction, and significance of each QTL, providing a detailed understanding of the genetic architecture underlying complex traits. QTL analysis can reveal whether certain regions of the genome have major effects on yield or whether the trait is controlled by numerous small-effect QTLs spread across the genome. This information is invaluable for breeders seeking to combine favorable alleles in a breeding program [4].

One of the key applications of QTL analysis in crop improvement is the identification of major yield-related QTLs that can be targeted for Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS). MAS is a breeding technique that uses genetic markers linked to desirable traits to select individuals carrying those traits, even before the traits are expressed. By incorporating QTL information into MAS, breeders can more efficiently develop high-yielding varieties, reducing the time and resources required for traditional breeding cycles. This approach has been successfully applied in crops like rice, maize, and wheat [5].

The integration of QTL analysis with other genomic tools, such as Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and genomic selection has further enhanced the precision and power of crop improvement efforts. GWAS allows for the identification of QTLs across diverse populations by associating genetic markers with traits at a genome-wide scale. Genomic selection, on the other hand, uses genome-wide marker data to predict the breeding value of individuals, enabling the selection of the best candidates for yield improvement. These combined approaches are transforming plant breeding by providing a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic factors that influence yield [6].

Recent advancements in high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies have significantly accelerated the pace of genetic mapping and QTL analysis. Modern sequencing technologies enable the rapid and cost-effective generation of large-scale marker data, while automated phenotyping platforms allow for precise and high-throughput measurement of yield-related traits. These advancements have expanded the scope of QTL studies, allowing for the analysis of larger populations and more complex traits, ultimately leading to more accurate identification of yield-related QTLs [7].

QTL analysis is not only useful for improving yield under optimal conditions but also for enhancing yield stability under stress conditions, such as drought, heat, or nutrient deficiency. Identifying QTLs associated with yield resilience under stress conditions is critical for developing crops that can maintain high productivity in the face of climate change and environmental variability. By understanding the genetic basis of yield stability, breeders can create varieties that perform well across different environments, contributing to more sustainable agricultural systems [8].

The application of genetic mapping and QTL analysis in crop improvement is not without challenges, particularly in the context of complex traits like yield. The expression of yield-related traits is influenced by numerous genetic and environmental interactions, making it difficult to identify QTLs with consistent effects across different environments. Additionally, the polygenic nature of yield means that many QTLs have small individual effects, requiring large populations and high statistical power to detect. Overcoming these challenges requires advanced statistical models and the integration of multi-environment trial data [9].

Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of QTL analysis for crop yield improvement are substantial, offering a pathway to more targeted and efficient breeding strategies. By dissecting the genetic basis of yield, researchers can identify key genomic regions that contribute to high productivity and stability, providing valuable targets for genetic improvement. As the demand for higher crop yields continues to grow, the role of QTL analysis in plant breeding will become increasingly important, driving innovations in agriculture and helping to meet global food security goals [10].

conclusion

Genetic mapping and QTL analysis are powerful tools that have transformed our understanding of the genetic architecture of crop yield and other complex traits. By providing insights into the specific regions of the genome that influence yield, these techniques enable more precise and efficient breeding strategies, ultimately contributing to the development of high-yielding, resilient crop varieties. As technology continues to advance, the integration of QTL analysis with other genomic approaches will further enhance our ability to improve crop yields and address the challenges of modern agriculture

References

  1. Çekiç FÖ, Ünyayar S, Orta? ?. (2012). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on biochemical parameters in Capsicum annuum grown under long term salt stress.Turk J Bot. (1):63-72.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  2. Genre A, Lanfranco L, Perotto S, Bonfante P.(2020). Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses.Nat Rev Microbiol. 18(11):649-60.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Gomez SK, Harrison MJ.(2009). Laser microdissection and its application to analyze gene expression in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Pest Manag Sci. 65(5):504-11.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Grant C, Bittman S, Montreal M, Plenchette C, Morel C.(2005). Soil and fertilizer phosphorus: Effects on plant P supply and mycorrhizal development. Can J Plant Sci. 85(1):3-14.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Hause B, Mrosk C, Isayenkov S, Strack D.(2007). Jasmonates in arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions. Phytochem. 68(1):101-10.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Kough JL, Gianinazzi?Pearson V, Gianinazzi S.(1987). Depressed metabolic activity of vesicular?arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi after fungicide applications.New Phytol. 106(4):707-15.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD, Gehring CA, Johnson NC, Klironomos JN, et al(2006). The promise and the potential consequences of the global transport of mycorrhizal fungal inoculum.Ecol Lett. 9(5):501-15.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Solaiman ZM, Blackwell P, Abbott LK, Storer P.(2010). Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat. Soil Res. 48(7):546-54.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Wang F.(2017).  Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mining-impacted sites and their contribution to ecological restoration: Mechanisms and applications. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol.47(20):1901-57.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Wilson GW, Rice CW, Rillig MC, Springer A, Hartnett DC.(2009). Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: results from long?term field experiments.Ecol Lett. 12(5):452-61.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App