Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Opinion Article - Archives of Industrial Biotechnology (2024) Volume 8, Issue 5

Genetic engineering in medicine: Advancing personalized therapies

Rajkuberan Prayaj *

Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt

*Corresponding Author:
Rajkuberan Prayaj
Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt
E-mail: rajkuberanprayaj@hotmail.com < /dd>

Received: 01-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-148721; Editor assigned: 02-Oct-2024, PreQC No AAAIB-24-148721 (PQ) Reviewed:15-Oct-2024, QC No. AAAIB-24-148721 Revised:22-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-148721 (R); Published:28-Oct-2024, DOI:10.35841/aaaib-8.5.227

Citation: Prayaj R. Genetic engineering in medicine: Advancing personalized therapies. Arch Ind Biot. 2024;8(5):227

Visit for more related articles at Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

Introduction

Genetic engineering, a rapidly evolving field of science, has revolutionized medicine by enabling personalized therapies that cater to the specific genetic makeup of individual patients. This transformative approach allows for more precise and effective treatment of diseases, particularly in areas such as cancer, genetic disorders, and rare diseases. By altering an individual's genetic code or manipulating cells at the molecular level, genetic engineering opens the door to highly customized medical interventions that offer hope for better health outcomes [1].

Personalized medicine aims to move away from the "one-size-fits-all" approach to healthcare, tailoring treatments based on a patient's unique genetic profile, lifestyle, and environment. Genetic engineering plays a pivotal role in this shift, providing tools to identify genetic mutations or abnormalities that contribute to disease, which can then be targeted with precision [2].

For instance, in cancer treatment, genetic engineering helps identify specific mutations in tumors, allowing oncologists to choose therapies that are most likely to be effective for that particular type of cancer. This can lead to fewer side effects and better treatment outcomes. Similarly, genetic engineering offers the potential to correct the underlying genetic causes of rare diseases, which often have no other treatment options [3].

One of the most notable breakthroughs in genetic engineering is the development of CRISPR-Cas9 technology. CRISPR allows scientists to make precise edits to DNA, offering the potential to correct genetic mutations that cause diseases. The technique is being explored in a variety of medical applications, from cancer therapies to the treatment of genetic disorders such as sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, and muscular dystrophy [4].

CRISPR is a game-changer because it is more efficient, cost-effective, and accurate than previous gene-editing methods. Researchers are optimistic that CRISPR could eventually lead to cures for many genetic diseases, fundamentally altering how medicine is practiced [5].

Gene therapy, a field closely linked to genetic engineering, involves inserting, deleting, or modifying genes to treat or prevent disease. It has shown great promise in treating conditions such as inherited blindness, spinal muscular atrophy, and certain immune disorders. By delivering healthy copies of genes to replace faulty ones, gene therapy aims to address the root cause of genetic diseases rather than merely managing symptoms [6].

In addition, genetic engineering plays a vital role in regenerative medicine, where it is used to create cells, tissues, and even organs for transplantation. Stem cell therapies, enhanced by genetic manipulation, are being explored as potential treatments for conditions like Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, and diabetes [7].

While the promise of genetic engineering in medicine is exciting, there are still challenges to overcome. One of the primary concerns is the ethical implications of gene editing, especially in humans. The prospect of editing genes to enhance physical or cognitive abilities—often referred to as "designer babies"—has raised concerns about potential misuse and long-term consequences [8].

Additionally, there are technical challenges, such as ensuring that gene editing is accurate and does not introduce unintended mutations that could cause harm. Researchers are working to refine these techniques and improve their safety before they become widely available in clinical practice [9].

The future of genetic engineering in medicine looks incredibly promising. As technology continues to advance, we can expect even more precise and effective therapies tailored to the needs of individual patients. Scientists are already exploring ways to expand the applications of genetic engineering to a broader range of diseases, including common conditions like cardiovascular disease and neurodegenerative disorders. One exciting area of research is the combination of genetic engineering with artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics. By analyzing vast amounts of genetic and clinical data, AI can help identify patterns that lead to better understanding of diseases and more personalized treatment options [10].

Conclusion

Genetic engineering is ushering in a new era of personalized medicine, with the potential to revolutionize healthcare. From CRISPR and gene therapy to regenerative medicine, these technologies are providing new ways to treat and, in some cases, cure diseases that were once thought incurable. While challenges remain, the advances in this field hold tremendous promise for improving the quality of life for patients worldwide and changing the future of medicine as we know it.

References

  1. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. NEJM. 1998;339(8):520-32.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Foster TJ. Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nature reviews microbiology. 2005;3(12):948-58.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Plata K, Rosato AE, Wegrzyn G. Staphylococcus aureus as an infectious agent: overview of biochemistry and molecular genetics of its pathogenicity. Acta Biochim   2009;11;56(4).

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, et al. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. NEJM. 2003;348(14):1342-7.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Murray CK, Holmes RL, Ellis MW, et al. Twenty-five year epidemiology of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered at a burn center. Burns. 2009;35(8):1112-7.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Tamma PD, Villegas MV. Use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for extended-spectrum-β-lactamase infections: defining the right patient population. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(8):e01094-17.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Kusumadewi YP, Febiyanti AM, Tazkiya I, et al. Streptococcus agalactiae is resistant to β-lactam antibiotics in a diabetic patient with foot infection: a case report. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;2(1):1-5.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Curello J, MacDougall C. Beyond susceptible and resistant, part II: treatment of infections due to Gram-negative organisms producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(3):156-64.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Shirley M. Ceftazidime-avibactam: a review in the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections. 2018;78(6):675-92.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. File Jr TM, Tan JS, Salstrom SJ, et al. Timentin versus piperacillin or moxalactam in the therapy of acute bacterial infections. Antimicrob  Agents   1984;26(3):310-3.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App