Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Opinion Article - Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1

Gene Expression Assays in Cancer Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine

David Mitchell*

Department of Public Health, Pacifica University, United States

*Corresponding Author:
David Mitchell
Department of Public Health
Pacifica University, United States
E-mail: david.mitchell@pacifica.edu

Received: 09-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AABB-25-161095; Editor assigned: 10-Feb-2025, Pre QC No. AABB-25-161095 (PQ); Reviewed: 22-Feb-2025, QC No. AABB-25-161095;
Revised: 24-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AABB-25-161095 (R); Published: 28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/aabb-8.1.247

Citation: Mitchell D. Gene Expression Assays in Cancer Diagnostics and Personalized Medicine. J Biochem Biotech 2025; 8(1):247.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Introduction

Gene expression assays have revolutionized the field of cancer diagnostics and treatment, offering a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving tumorigenesis. These assays measure the activity of thousands of genes simultaneously, providing insights into the molecular profile of individual tumors. In personalized medicine, gene expression assays are crucial for tailoring treatments to patients based on the unique genetic characteristics of their cancer. This article explores the role of gene expression assays in cancer diagnostics, their applications in personalized medicine, and the challenges and future prospects of these technologies [1].

Cancer is a genetic disease characterized by abnormal gene expression patterns that drive uncontrolled cell growth and metastasis. Gene expression assays provide a snapshot of the genes that are active or inactive in a tumor, allowing researchers and clinicians to identify the molecular drivers of cancer. This information is vital for understanding the biology of cancer and for developing targeted therapies that specifically inhibit the activity of cancer-causing genes [2].

There are several types of gene expression assays used in cancer diagnostics, including quantitative PCR (qPCR), microarrays, and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). qPCR is a highly sensitive technique that quantifies the expression of specific genes, while microarrays and RNA-seq provide a broader view of gene expression across the entire genome. RNA-seq, in particular, has emerged as the gold standard for gene expression profiling due to its ability to capture both known and novel transcripts, as well as its high sensitivity and accuracy [3].

One of the key applications of gene expression assays in cancer is the identification of gene expression signatures, which are sets of genes that are consistently upregulated or downregulated in specific types of cancer. These signatures can be used to classify tumors into molecular subtypes, predict patient outcomes, and guide treatment decisions. For example, the PAM50 gene expression assay is used to classify breast cancer into four molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like. Each subtype has a distinct prognosis and responds differently to various therapies [4].

Gene expression assays play a crucial role in identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Prognostic biomarkers provide information about a patient’s overall cancer outcome, regardless of treatment, while predictive biomarkers indicate how a patient is likely to respond to a specific therapy. For instance, the Oncotype DX assay, which analyzes the expression of 21 genes, is used to predict the likelihood of recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients and to guide decisions about the need for chemotherapy [5].

Personalized medicine aims to match patients with the most effective treatments based on the molecular profile of their tumors. Gene expression assays are essential in this process, as they can identify genes that are associated with drug sensitivity or resistance. For example, the expression of the HER2 gene is used to determine whether a breast cancer patient is likely to benefit from HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab. Similarly, gene expression assays can identify patients who are likely to respond to immunotherapies, such as those targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway [6].

Recent advances in gene expression assays have led to the development of liquid biopsies, which analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or cell-free RNA in blood samples. Liquid biopsies offer a non-invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsies, allowing for the monitoring of gene expression changes over time. This is particularly useful in tracking the response to treatment and detecting minimal residual disease or early relapse. Liquid biopsies are poised to become an integral part of personalized cancer care, providing real-time insights into tumor dynamics [7].

Despite their potential, gene expression assays face several challenges in clinical application. Tumor heterogeneity, where different regions of a tumor or different tumors within the same patient exhibit distinct gene expression patterns, can complicate the interpretation of assay results. Additionally, the high cost and complexity of some assays, particularly RNA-seq, can limit their accessibility in routine clinical practice. Standardizing assay protocols and improving data interpretation methods are critical for overcoming these challenges and ensuring the widespread adoption of gene expression assays in cancer care [8].

To fully realize the potential of gene expression assays in personalized medicine, it is essential to integrate gene expression data with other types of omics data, such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. This multi-omics approach provides a more comprehensive view of the molecular landscape of cancer, allowing for a deeper understanding of the interactions between genes, proteins, and metabolites in driving cancer progression. Integrating gene expression data with clinical information, such as patient history and imaging results, is also crucial for developing more accurate predictive models for cancer diagnosis and treatment [9].

The future of gene expression assays in cancer diagnostics and personalized medicine looks promising, with ongoing advancements in sequencing technologies, data analysis, and computational biology. Single-cell RNA sequencing, for example, is enabling researchers to study gene expression at the level of individual cells, providing insights into the heterogeneity of tumors and the microenvironment. As these technologies continue to evolve, gene expression assays will become even more powerful tools for guiding treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes [10].

Conclusion

Gene expression assays are transforming cancer diagnostics and personalized medicine by providing detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms driving cancer. From identifying gene expression signatures to guiding treatment decisions and developing non-invasive liquid biopsies, these assays are playing a critical role in the shift towards more personalized cancer care. Despite challenges such as tumor heterogeneity and assay complexity, ongoing innovations in technology and data integration promise to enhance the precision and utility of gene expression assays in the years to come.

References

  1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747-52.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  2. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817-26.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Gen. 2009;10(1):57-63.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. Clin Oncol. 2009;27(8):1160-7.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Arechederra M, Ávila MA, Berasain C. Liquid biopsy for cancer management: a revolutionary but still limited new tool for precision medicine. Adv Lab Med. 2020;1(3):20200009.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Abramson VG. Role of patient and disease factors in adjuvant systemic therapy decision making for early-stage, operable breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of Cancer Care Ontario guideline recommendations. Clin Oncol. 2016;34(19):2303-11.

    7. Indexed at, Cross Ref

  7. Mf B. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature. 2011;470:214-20.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2008;455(7216):1069-75.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE. Cancer statistics, 2021. 2021;71(1):7-33.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  10. van der Velden DL, Hoes LR, Van Der Wijngaart H. The Drug Rediscovery protocol facilitates the expanded use of existing anticancer drugs. Nature. 2019;574(7776):127-31.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App