Journal of Fisheries Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Editorial - Journal of Fisheries Research (2024) Volume 8, Issue 6

Fisheries-Induced Evolution: Long-Term Implications for Stock Recovery

Noah Fischer*

Department of Civil Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

*Corresponding Author:
Noah Fischer
Department of Civil Engineering
ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
E-mail: nfischer@ethz.ch

Received: 03-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. AAJFR-24-156647; Editor assigned: 04-Dec-2024, PreQC No. AAJFR-24-1566475(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Dec-2024, QC No AAJFR-24-1566475; Revised: 21-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. AAJFR-24-1566475(R); Published: 28-Dec-2024, DOI:10.35841/aajfr-8.6.242

Citation: Fischer N. Fisheries-induced evolution: Long-term implications for stock recovery. J Fish Res. 2024;8(6):242.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries Research

Introduction

Fisheries-induced evolution (FIE) refers to the genetic and phenotypic changes in fish populations driven by intense and selective harvesting practices. Over decades, fisheries have targeted specific traits such as large body size and rapid growth, which are highly sought after in commercial markets [1]. However, these selective pressures can lead to unintended evolutionary consequences. Traits that once provided advantages in natural environments, such as fast growth or delayed reproduction may become disadvantages under heavy fishing pressure. Smaller size at maturity, earlier reproduction, and reduced growth rates are among the most frequently observed evolutionary responses to intensive fishing [2].

The implications of FIE are profound, extending beyond the immediate depletion of fish stocks. The evolutionary changes can result in long-term reductions in the productivity and resilience of fish populations [3]. Smaller, early-maturing fish often have lower reproductive output, which can limit the population's ability to recover from overfishing. Furthermore, the loss of genetic diversity associated with FIE can reduce a population's capacity to adapt to environmental changes, such as shifts in ocean temperature or habitat availability caused by climate change [4].

Stock recovery efforts often focus on reducing fishing pressure, establishing marine protected areas, or implementing quotas and size limits [5]. While these measures can help rebuild fish populations, they may not reverse the evolutionary changes caused by prolonged harvesting. Traits like earlier maturation and slower growth may persist for generations, even after fishing pressure is reduced, because the genetic changes underpinning these traits are not easily undone. This evolutionary inertia can slow the recovery process, leading to economic and ecological challenges [6].

Another critical consideration is the broader ecosystem impact of FIE. Altered traits in fish populations can cascade through the food web, affecting predator-prey dynamics and the structure of marine communities [7]. For example, smaller fish might become more vulnerable to predation, disrupting the balance between predators and prey. Similarly, changes in the timing of reproduction can affect the availability of eggs and larvae for other species that depend on them for food [8].

To address the long-term implications of FIE, fisheries management must incorporate evolutionary principles into policy and practice. Strategies such as selective fishing that avoids targeting specific traits, promoting the survival of larger individuals, and maintaining genetic diversity are crucial. Adaptive management approaches, informed by robust scientific research and long-term monitoring, are necessary to ensure the sustainability of fish populations and the ecosystems they support [9].

Public awareness and stakeholder engagement are also essential components of managing FIE. Educating fishers, policymakers, and consumers about the evolutionary consequences of overfishing can foster more sustainable practices and reduce the demand for traits that drive harmful selective pressures. Integrating socio-economic considerations, such as providing alternative livelihoods for fishers and ensuring equitable access to resources, can further support efforts to mitigate the impacts of FIE [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, fisheries-induced evolution represents a significant challenge for the sustainable management of fish stocks and marine ecosystems. The long-term consequences of these evolutionary changes underscore the need for proactive and adaptive approaches to fisheries management. By addressing the root causes of FIE and promoting sustainable practices, it is possible to support the recovery of fish populations and maintain the ecological and economic benefits they provide.

References

  1. Heino M, Díaz Pauli B, Dieckmann U. Fisheries-induced evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2015;46(1):461-80.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Kuparinen A, Merilä J. Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22(12):652-9.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Uusi-Heikkilä S, Wolter C, Klefoth T, et al. A behavioral perspective on fishing-induced evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(8):419-21.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Enberg K, Jørgensen C, Dunlop ES, et al. Fishing-induced evolution of growth: Concepts, mechanisms and the empirical evidence. Marine ecology. 2012;33(1):1-25.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Singer MC, Thomas CD, Parmesan C. Rapid human-induced evolution of insect–host associations. Nature. 1993;366(6456):681-3.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Hutchings JA, Fraser DJ. The nature of fisheries-and farming-induced evolution. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(1):294-313.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Enberg K, Jørgensen C, Dunlop ES, et al. Implications of fisheries-induced evolution for stock rebuilding and recovery. Evol Appl. 2009;2(3):394-414.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Allendorf FW, Hard JJ. Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(supplement_1):9987-94.

    9. Google Scholar

  9. Andersen KH, Brander K. Expected rate of fisheries-induced evolution is slow. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(28):11657-60.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Maynard A, McCoach CE, Rotow JK, et al. Therapy-induced evolution of human lung cancer revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Cell. 2020;182(5):1232-51.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App