Addiction & Criminology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Mini Review - Addiction & Criminology (2024) Volume 7, Issue 4

Exploring the Role of Addiction in Recidivism Implications for Criminal Justice Policy

Joseph Nyland *

Department of Neural & Behavioral Sciences, University Drive, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Joseph Nyland
Department of Neural & Behavioral Sciences, University Drive, USA
E-mail: jos.nyland@psu.edu

Received: 01-Aug -2024, Manuscript No. AARA-24-144068; Editor assigned: 02-Aug-2024, PreQC No. AARA-24-144068 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Aug-2024, QC No. AARA-24-144068; Revised:21-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AARA-24-144068 (R); Published:30-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.4.216

Citation: Nyland J, Exploring the role of addiction in recidivism implications for criminal justice policy. Addict Criminol. 2024;7(4):216

Visit for more related articles at Addiction & Criminology

Introduction

Recidivism, the tendency of convicted criminals to reoffend, is a persistent issue in criminal justice systems worldwide. A significant factor contributing to high recidivism rates is addiction. Substance abuse and dependence often perpetuate a cycle of crime, incarceration, and relapse, posing challenges to both the individuals involved and the broader society. Understanding the role of addiction in recidivism is crucial for developing effective criminal justice policies that aim not only to punish but also to rehabilitate offenders and reduce reoffense rates [1].

Addiction is a chronic, relapsing disorder characterized by compulsive drug seeking, continued use despite harmful consequences, and long-lasting changes in the brain. The relationship between addiction and crime is multifaceted. Individuals struggling with substance use disorders (SUDs) often engage in criminal activities to support their addiction, whether through drug trafficking, theft, or other illegal acts. Additionally, the altered mental state induced by substance abuse can impair judgment and impulse control, leading to violent or risky behaviors that result in criminal charges [2].

Research consistently shows that a significant proportion of incarcerated individuals have a history of substance abuse. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), approximately 65% of the U.S. prison population meets the criteria for substance use disorder. However, only a fraction of these individuals receive the treatment they need while incarcerated, increasing the likelihood of relapse and recidivism upon release [3].

Addiction plays a central role in driving recidivism. Upon release from prison, individuals with untreated or inadequately managed addiction are highly vulnerable to returning to drug use. The stress of reentry into society, combined with the lack of support systems and the stigma associated with criminal records, can exacerbate the temptation to relapse. Once addiction resumes, the cycle of criminal behavior often follows, leading to re-incarceration [4].

Moreover, the criminal justice system's traditional focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation fails to address the underlying issues that lead to reoffending. Offenders with substance use disorders may complete their sentences without receiving any form of treatment or support for their addiction. As a result, they are released back into the community with the same challenges that initially led them to commit crimes. Given the strong link between addiction and recidivism, there is a growing recognition that addressing substance use disorders within the criminal justice system is essential for reducing reoffense rates. Several policy implications arise from this understanding [5].

To effectively combat recidivism, it is imperative to expand access to addiction treatment within correctional facilities. This includes medically assisted treatment (MAT), which combines behavioral therapy and medications to treat substance use disorders, as well as counseling and support services that address the psychological aspects of addiction. Ensuring that treatment continues post-release through community-based programs is also critical for sustaining recovery and preventing relapse [6].

Judges and policymakers should consider integrating addiction treatment into sentencing decisions, particularly for non-violent offenders. Drug courts, which offer offenders the opportunity to undergo treatment instead of serving traditional jail time, have shown promise in reducing recidivism by addressing the root cause of criminal behavior. Such approaches shift the focus from punitive measures to therapeutic interventions, promoting long-term recovery and public safety [7].

Reentry programs that provide support services such as housing, employment assistance, and mental health care can significantly reduce the risk of relapse and recidivism. These programs help individuals reintegrate into society, offering stability and reducing the pressures that can lead to substance abuse. Policymakers should prioritize funding for these initiatives, recognizing that successful reentry is key to breaking the cycle of addiction and crime [8].

Criminal justice policies must also address the broader social determinants that contribute to addiction and crime, such as poverty, lack of education, and inadequate healthcare. By implementing policies that improve access to education, employment, and social services, the root causes of both addiction and criminal behavior can be mitigated, leading to a reduction in recidivism [9].

The criminal justice system should increasingly emphasize rehabilitation over incarceration, particularly for individuals whose crimes are driven by addiction. This approach not only benefits the individuals involved by providing them with the tools they need to recover, but it also benefits society by reducing the burden on the prison system and lowering overall crime rates [10].

conclusion

Addiction is a powerful driver of recidivism, creating a cycle of crime and incarceration that is difficult to break without targeted interventions. Criminal justice policies that prioritize treatment, support reentry, and address the social determinants of addiction offer a path toward reducing recidivism and promoting public safety. By shifting the focus from punishment to rehabilitation, policymakers can create a more effective and humane criminal justice system that addresses the root causes of criminal behavior, ultimately leading to better outcomes for individuals and communities alike.

References

  1. Wise RA, Koob GF. The development and maintenance of drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;39(2):254-62.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Belenko S, Hiller M, Hamilton L. Treating substance use disorders in the criminal justice system. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013;15:1-1.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Marlowe DB, Meyer WG, editors. The drug court judicial benchbook. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute; 2011.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  4. Shippenberg TS, Zapata A, Chefer V. Dynorphin and the pathophysiology of drug addiction. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116(2):306-21.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Rado S. The psychoanalysis of pharmacothymia (drug addiction). Psychoanal Quart. 1933;2(1):1-23.

    6. Google Scholar

  6. Goldstein RZ, Bechara A, Garavan H, Childress AR, Paulus MP, Volkow ND. The neurocircuitry of impaired insight in drug addiction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13(9):372-80.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Prendergast ML, Podus D, Chang E, Urada D. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;67(1):53-72.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  8. Taxman FS, Bouffard JA. The importance of systems in improving offender outcomes: New frontiers in treatment integrity. Justice Res Policy. 2000;2(2):37-58.

    9. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Visher CA, Travis J. Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annu Rev Sociol. 2003;29(1):89-113.

    10. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Marlowe DB. Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. Sci Pract Perspect. 2003;2(1):4.

    11. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App