Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Mini Review - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 4

Expanding Horizons in Cancer Therapy

Joshua Levitin *

Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, US

*Corresponding Author:
Joshua Levitin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, US
E-mail: joshua.lev@corewellhealth.org

Received: 01-Aug -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-144150; Editor assigned: 02-Aug-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-144150 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Aug-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-144150; Revised:21-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-144150 (R); Published:30-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.4.217

Citation: Levitin J., Expanding horizons in cancer therapy. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(4):217

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

Cancer therapy is continually evolving, driven by advancements in research and technology. This dynamic field offers a broad range of treatment options that extend beyond traditional methods, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The emergence of innovative therapies and the expansion of existing treatment modalities have significantly improved patient outcomes and provided new hope for those battling cancer. This article explores some of the latest advancements in cancer therapy, highlighting their potential to transform the landscape of oncology [1].

Immunotherapy harnesses the body’s immune system to target and destroy cancer cells. This approach has revolutionized cancer treatment, offering new possibilities for cancers that were previously difficult to treat. Key types of immunotherapy include checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, and monoclonal antibodies [2].

These drugs block proteins that inhibit immune responses, allowing the immune system to attack cancer cells more effectively. Recent studies, such as those published in New England Journal of Medicine, have shown significant improvements in survival rates for patients with melanoma and lung cancer [3].

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy involves modifying a patient’s T cells to recognize and attack cancer cells. This therapy has shown remarkable success in treating hematologic malignancies, including certain types of lymphoma and leukemia [4].

These are lab-made molecules designed to bind to specific cancer cell markers. They can be used alone or in combination with other treatments. Research in Cancer Research highlights their effectiveness in treating various cancers, including breast and colorectal cancer [5].

Targeted therapies are designed to specifically target cancer cells without affecting normal cells. They work by interfering with specific molecules involved in cancer cell growth and survival. These drugs block enzymes that promote cancer cell proliferation. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has transformed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and is supported by studies in Blood showing its efficacy in improving patient outcomes [6].

These inhibitors target cancer cells with defective DNA repair mechanisms. They have shown promise in treating ovarian and breast cancers with BRCA mutations, as demonstrated in The Lancet Oncology. Personalized medicine involves tailoring cancer treatment based on an individual’s genetic profile and the genetic makeup of their tumor. This approach allows for more precise and effective treatments [7].

By analyzing the genetic mutations in a patient’s tumor, clinicians can select therapies that specifically target those mutations. This approach has been highlighted in Journal of Clinical Oncology for its role in identifying targeted treatments and improving patient outcomes. Liquid biopsies analyze cancer-related genetic material from blood samples, offering a less invasive method for monitoring cancer progression and treatment response. Research in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology indicates their potential for early detection and personalized treatment planning [8].

Radiation therapy has also seen significant advancements, improving its precision and effectiveness. Proton therapy uses protons instead of X-rays to target tumors. This technique offers the advantage of delivering radiation directly to the tumor while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Studies in Journal of Clinical Oncology support its use in treating various cancers with reduced side effects [9].

This technique delivers high doses of radiation to precisely defined tumor areas. It is particularly effective for brain tumors and metastases. Evidence from Neuro-Oncology demonstrates its efficacy in achieving tumor control with minimal side effects. While traditional chemotherapy remains a staple in cancer treatment, novel agents and combinations are continually being developed to enhance efficacy and reduce toxicity [10].

Conclusion

The field of cancer therapy is expanding rapidly, driven by advancements in immunotherapy, targeted therapy, personalized medicine, radiation therapy, and novel chemotherapy agents. These innovations offer new hope for patients and have the potential to transform cancer treatment, making it more effective and less invasive. As research progresses and new technologies emerge, the horizon of cancer therapy continues to broaden, promising better outcomes and improved quality of life for cancer patients worldwide.

References

  1. Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(3):193.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  2. Stoll HP, Hutchins GD, Winkle WL, Nguyen AT, Appledorn CR, Janzen I, Seifert H, Rübe C, Schieffer H, March KL. Advantages of short-lived positron-emitting radioisotopes for intracoronary radiation therapy with liquid-filled balloons to prevent restenosis. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(9):1375-83.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Bucci MK, Bevan A, Roach III M. Advances in radiation therapy: conventional to 3D, to IMRT, to 4D, and beyond. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):117-34.

    4. Google Scholar

  4. Shepard DM, Ferris MC, Olivera GH, Mackie TR. Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to cancer patients. Siam Rev. 1999;41(4):721-44.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Henke L, Kashani R, Yang D, Zhao T, Green O, Olsen L, Rodriguez V, Wooten HO, Li HH, Hu Y, Bradley J. Simulated online adaptive magnetic resonance–guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of oligometastatic disease of the abdomen and central thorax: characterization of potential advantages. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(5):1078-86.

    6. Google Scholar

  6. Yamamoto T, Kabus S, Bal M, Bzdusek K, Keall PJ, Wright C, Benedict SH, Daly ME. Changes in regional ventilation during treatment and dosimetric advantages of CT ventilation image guided radiation therapy for locally advanced lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(4):1366-73.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Tsujii H, Kamada T, Baba M, Tsuji H, Kato H, Kato S, Yamada S, Yasuda S, Yanagi T, Kato H, Hara R. Clinical advantages of carbon-ion radiotherapy. N J 2008;10(7):075009.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Van de Schoot AJ, de Boer P, Visser J, Stalpers LJ, Rasch CR, Bel A. Dosimetric advantages of a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy compared with a non-adaptive strategy in cervical cancer radiation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(5):667-74.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Brahme A. Recent advances in light ion radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58(2):603-16.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  10. Cheung KY. Intensity modulated radiotherapy: advantages, limitations and future developments. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2006;2(1):e19.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar

Get the App