Rapid Communication - Journal of Environmental Waste Management and Recycling (2024) Volume 7, Issue 6
E-Waste Recycling: A Critical Step Toward a Sustainable Future
Aylin Nur Corona*FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, Germany
- *Corresponding Author:
- Aylin Nur Corona
FH Münster University of Applied Sciences
Germany
E-mail: aylin.corona@fh-muenster.de
Received: 01-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAEWMR-24-155187; Editor assigned: 05-Nov-2024, Pre QC No. AAEWMR-24-155187 (PQ); Reviewed: 19-Nov-2024, QC No. AAEWMR-24-155187; Revised: 22-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAEWMR-24-155187 (R); Published: 29-Nov-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaewmr-8.6.233
Citation: Corona A. E-Waste Recycling: A Critical Step Toward a Sustainable Future. 2024; 7(6):233
Abstract
Introduction
Electronic waste, or e-waste, refers to discarded electrical or electronic devices, such as computers, smartphones, televisions, and refrigerators. As technology continues to advance at a rapid pace, the amount of e-waste being generated globally is growing [1]. According to the Global E-Waste Monitor, around 53.6 million metric tons of e-waste were generated in 2019 alone, and this number is expected to rise each year. E-waste recycling plays a crucial role in managing this growing problem by recovering valuable materials and reducing the environmental impact of electronic waste [2, 3].
Components
E-waste contains a wide variety of materials, including metals like gold, silver, copper, and rare earth elements, as well as plastics, glass, and hazardous substances like lead, mercury, and cadmium. Recycling e-waste helps recover these valuable resources, which can be reused in manufacturing new products, reducing the need for mining and conserving natural resources [4, 5]. It also helps prevent the release of toxic chemicals into the environment, which can contaminate soil and water, posing serious health risks to humans and wildlife.\The process of e-waste recycling involves several stages. First, the electronic devices are collected, sorted, and disassembled [6]. This is typically done manually or with the help of machines to separate different components. The materials are then processed, with metals being melted down for reuse, plastics being cleaned and recycled, and glass being purified for new products. Hazardous materials are carefully disposed of in specialized facilities to prevent contamination [7, 8].
Despite the benefits, e-waste recycling faces challenges. Informal recycling practices, especially in developing countries, often involve unsafe methods, such as burning or acid baths, which can release harmful toxins into the environment. In addition, the lack of proper recycling infrastructure and consumer awareness in many regions makes it difficult to collect and recycle e-waste effectively [9, 10].
Conclusion
In conclusion, e-waste recycling is an essential practice for reducing the environmental impact of electronic waste and recovering valuable resources. While the process offers significant environmental benefits, it requires proper infrastructure, technology, and public awareness to ensure that e-waste is managed safely and efficiently. By supporting responsible recycling initiatives, promoting the reuse of electronics, and encouraging sustainable design practices in the tech industry, we can reduce the growing problem of e-waste and move toward a more sustainable future.
References
- Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012; 1249(1):118-36.
- Mercader-Moyano P, Flores-García M, Serrano-Jiménez A. Housing and neighbourhood diagnosis for ageing in place: Multidimensional Assessment System of the Built Environment (MASBE). Sustainable cities and society. 2020; 62:102422.
- de Keijzer C, Bauwelinck M, Dadvand P. Long-term exposure to residential greenspace and healthy ageing: A systematic review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2020; 7(1):65-88.
- Orr N, Wagstaffe A, Briscoe S, et al. How do older people describe their sensory experiences of the natural world? A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMC geriatrics. 2016; 16(1):1-6.
- Chen Y, Yuan Y. The neighborhood effect of exposure to blue space on elderly individuals’ mental health: A case study in Guangzhou, China. Health & Place. 2020; 63:102348.
- Rugel EJ, Carpiano RM, Henderson SB, et al. Exposure to natural space, sense of community belonging, and adverse mental health outcomes across an urban region. Environ Res. 2019; 171:365-77.
- Liu Y, Wang R, Lu Y, et al. Natural outdoor environment, neighbourhood social cohesion and mental health: Using multilevel structural equation modelling, streetscape and remote-sensing metrics. Urban For Urban Green. 2020; 48:126576.
- Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M. Health effects of viewing landscapes–Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban For Urban Green. 2007; 6(4):199-212.
- Burton EJ, Mitchell L, Stride CB. Good places for ageing in place: development of objective built environment measures for investigating links with older people's wellbeing. BMC public health. 2011; 11(1):1-3.
- Ochodo C, Ndetei DM, Moturi WN, et al. External built residential environment characteristics that affect mental health of adults. J Urban Health. 2014; 91(5):908-27.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref