Short Communication - Journal of Trauma and Critical Care (2023) Volume 7, Issue 4
Ethical Considerations in Trauma Care: Balancing Patient Autonomy and Beneficence.
Sophia Khaitan *
Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,Ohio
- *Corresponding Author:
- Sophia Khaitan
Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,Ohio
E-mail: khaitansophia@uhhospitals.org
Received: 04-aug-2023, Manuscript No. AATCC-23-109122; Editor assigned: 05-aug-2023, PreQC No. AATCC-23-109122; Reviewed:18-aug-2023, QC No. AATCC-23-109122; Revised:20-aug-2023, Manuscript No. AATCC-23-109122 (R); Published:27-aug-2023, DOI:10.35841/ aatcc -7.4.159
Citation: Khaitan S. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Ohio. J Trauma Crit Care 2023; 7(4):159
Introduction
Trauma is a profound and life-altering experience that not only affects the physical well-being of individuals but also has a significant impact on their psychological and emotional health. Trauma resilience refers to the ability of individuals to adapt, cope, and recover from traumatic events, fostering a sense of inner strength and well-being. Psychological interventions play a pivotal role in promoting trauma resilience for both patients and caregivers, helping them navigate the emotional aftermath of traumatic experiences. This paper aims to explore the concept of trauma resilience and the various psychological interventions designed to support trauma survivors and their caregivers on their journey to recovery [1].
Trauma resilience encompasses a multifaceted approach to healing and restoration. It involves not only overcoming the immediate emotional and psychological distress caused by the traumatic event but also rebuilding a sense of self and finding meaning and purpose in life after such experiences. Understanding the factors that contribute to resilience and identifying effective interventions is crucial in providing comprehensive trauma care that addresses not only the physical injuries but also the emotional and psychological well-being of patients and caregivers [2].
Psychological interventions for trauma resilience encompass a range of evidence-based approaches, each tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of the individual. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is one such intervention that focuses on identifying and changing negative thought patterns and behaviors that may arise after trauma. Through CBT, trauma survivors and caregivers can develop coping strategies to manage anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms, empowering them to regain control over their lives [3].
Another critical ethical consideration in trauma care involves resource allocation. In emergency situations, medical resources, including personnel, equipment, and supplies, may become limited. Ethical principles call for the fair distribution of resources, ensuring that all patients have equitable access to the care they need. However, in resource-constrained environments, healthcare providers may face difficult decisions in determining how to allocate scarce resources in the most effective and ethical manner [4].
Moreover, the long-term implications of trauma care decisions also warrant ethical reflection. Trauma survivors may face prolonged physical and psychological consequences, and their quality of life could be significantly affected. Ethical considerations extend beyond the immediate treatment phase and encompass the provision of comprehensive rehabilitation and support to help patients achieve the best possible long-term outcomes [5].
conclusion
Ethical considerations lie at the heart of trauma care, requiring healthcare providers to delicately navigate the tensions between patient autonomy and beneficence. Striking a balance between respecting patients' wishes and promoting their well-being is essential in delivering patient-centered trauma care. Open communication and collaboration with patients, their families, and the healthcare team are crucial in making ethically sound decisions
References
- Jain A, Appelbaum PS. Balancing autonomy and beneficence at the time of psychiatric discharge . Isr. J. Health Policy Res. 2018;7(1):1-4.
- Sultan H, Mansour R, Shamieh O, et al . DNR and COVID-19: The ethical dilemma and suggested solutions. Front Public Health. 2021;9:560405.
- Larkin GL, Marco CA, Abbott JT. Emergency Determination of Decision?making Capacity: Balancing Autonomy and Beneficence in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(3):282-4.
- McKillip KM, Lott AD, Swetz KM. Focus: Death: Respecting Autonomy and Promoting the Patient’s Good in the Setting of Serious Terminal and Concurrent Mental Illness. Yale J Biol Med. 2019;92(4):597. Indexed at, Google Scholar
- Gronowski AM, Budelier MM, Campbell SM. Ethics for laboratory medicine. Clinical che. 2019;65(12):1497-507.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref