Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Opinion Article - Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics (2024) Volume 9, Issue 6

Environmental and Genetic Factors in Carcinogenesis: A Pathway to Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment

Julie Malkani *

Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, UK

*Corresponding Author:
Julie Malkani
Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, UK
E-mail: malkani@cam.ac.uk

Received: 2-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. JMOT-24-151232; Editor assigned: 4-Nov-2024, PreQC No. JMOT-24-151232 (PQ) Reviewed:18-Nov-2024, QC No. JMOT-24-151232Revised:25-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. JMOT-24-151232; Published:30-Nov-2024, DOI: 10.35841/jmot- 9.6.236

Citation: Malkani J. Environmental and genetic factors in carcinogenesis: A pathway to personalized cancer risk assessment. J Med Oncl Ther. 2024;9(6):236

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics

Introduction

Carcinogenesis, the process by which normal cells transform into cancer cells, is a complex interplay of genetic mutations and environmental exposures. Both intrinsic genetic predispositions and extrinsic environmental factors contribute to cancer development. In the era of personalized medicine, understanding the relative influence of these factors is essential for accurate cancer risk assessment, early detection, and tailored prevention strategies. This article explores the dynamic interaction between environmental and genetic factors in carcinogenesis and how this understanding can pave the way for personalized cancer risk assessment [1].

Genetic factors play a crucial role in cancer susceptibility. Certain inherited mutations can predispose individuals to specific types of cancer. For instance, mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes significantly increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Additionally, mutations in tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and APC have been associated with a variety of cancers, including colorectal and lung cancer. These mutations disrupt normal cellular processes, such as DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis, ultimately leading to uncontrolled cell growth [2].

Recent advancements in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered numerous genetic variants, known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), that modestly increase cancer risk. While these SNPs may not individually cause cancer, they can cumulatively influence an individual's susceptibility, especially in conjunction with environmental factors [3].

Environmental exposures are among the most modifiable risk factors for cancer development. Carcinogens in the environment—such as tobacco smoke, radiation, asbestos, and certain chemicals—can directly damage DNA, leading to mutations that initiate carcinogenesis. For example, the link between tobacco smoke and lung cancer is well-established, with carcinogens in the smoke inducing mutations in key oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes [4].

Diet, pollution, occupational hazards, and exposure to UV radiation are also critical environmental contributors to carcinogenesis. For example, frequent exposure to UV radiation increases the risk of skin cancers such as melanoma. Furthermore, industrial pollutants and certain chemicals used in agriculture are known to increase the risk of cancers in exposed populations, highlighting the need for regulatory interventions to minimize exposure [5].

While genetic and environmental factors can individually contribute to cancer development, their interaction often determines the overall risk. Some individuals may carry genetic variants that make them more susceptible to the carcinogenic effects of environmental exposures. For instance, individuals with inherited defects in the DNA repair pathway may be less capable of repairing damage caused by environmental carcinogens, leading to an increased likelihood of cancer development [6].

Conversely, certain environmental factors may exacerbate the impact of genetic mutations. For example, individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer may experience accelerated cancer progression when exposed to a diet high in red meat and processed foods, both known risk factors for colorectal cancer [7].

Epigenetics refers to changes in gene expression that do not involve alterations to the DNA sequence but can be influenced by environmental factors. These changes can be heritable and play a significant role in cancer development. Environmental exposures, such as smoking and poor diet, can cause epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, which may activate oncogenes or silence tumor suppressor genes [8].

The study of epigenetics has broadened our understanding of carcinogenesis, revealing that even non-genotoxic factors—those that do not directly damage DNA—can still contribute to cancer development through epigenetic changes. This insight has important implications for cancer prevention and risk assessment [9].

With advances in genomics and molecular biology, personalized cancer risk assessment has become increasingly feasible. By analyzing an individual's genetic makeup alongside their environmental exposures, healthcare providers can offer a more tailored evaluation of cancer risk. Tools such as polygenic risk scores, which aggregate the effects of multiple genetic variants, allow for more accurate predictions of cancer susceptibility [10].

Conclusion

Environmental and genetic factors play integral roles in carcinogenesis, with their interaction often shaping an individual's cancer risk. The evolving field of personalized cancer risk assessment, which integrates genetic, environmental, and epigenetic data, holds great potential for improving early detection, prevention, and treatment strategies. As this field advances, it will not only revolutionize individual patient care but also contribute to more effective public health strategies in cancer prevention.

References

  1. Sebens N. Carcinogenesis and genetic susceptibility: Unravelling the risk factors. J Carcinog. 2023;22(1).

    2. Google Scholar

  2. Barrett JC. Mechanisms of multistep carcinogenesis and carcinogen risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;100:9-20.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Landi S. Genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors to pancreatic cancer: A review of the literature. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. 2009;681(2-3):299-307.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Kaina B, Izzotti A, Xu J, et al. Inherent and toxicant-provoked reduction in DNA repair capacity: A key mechanism for personalized risk assessment, cancer prevention and intervention, and response to therapy. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(7):993-1006.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Lewandowska AM, Rudzki M, Rudzki S, et al. Environmental risk factors for cancer-review paper. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;26(1):1-7.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Boffetta P, Nyberg F. Contribution of environmental factors to cancer risk. Br Med Bull. 2003;68(1):71-94.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Shields PG, Harris CC. Cancer risk and low-penetrance susceptibility genes in gene-environment interactions. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2309-15.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Roukos DH. Assessing both genetic variation (SNPs/CNVs) and gene–environment interactions may lead to personalized gastric cancer prevention. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9(1):1-6.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Locke PA, Weil MM. Personalized cancer risk assessments for space radiation exposures. Front oncol. 2016;6:38.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Berinde GM, Socaciu AI, Socaciu MA, et al. Thyroid cancer diagnostics related to occupational and environmental risk factors: An integrated risk assessment approach. Diagnostics. 2022;12(2):318.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App