Perspective - Anesthesiology and Clinical Science Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1
Enhanced recovery after surgery: A paradigm shift in postoperative care and anesthesia
Thomas Clark *
Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
- *Corresponding Author:
- Thomas Clark
Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
E-mail: clarkthms@yahoo.com
Received: 03-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAACSR-25-162693; Editor assigned: 04-Mar-2025, PreQC No. AAACSR-25-162693; Reviewed:18-Mar-2025, QC No. AAACSR-25-162693; Revised:24-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. AAACSR-25-162693(R); Published:31-Mar-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aaacsr-9.1.210
Citation: Clark T. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A paradigm shift in postoperative care and anesthesia. Anaesthesiol Clin Sci Res 2025;9(1):210
Introduction
The healthcare community has long recognized the importance of optimizing the postoperative period to improve surgical outcomes and enhance patient recovery. Traditional approaches to postoperative care often focused primarily on managing pain and monitoring for complications, but recent years have witnessed a significant shift toward a more comprehensive, evidence-based approach. One of the most transformative innovations in this area is the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, a set of multimodal strategies designed to accelerate recovery and minimize the physiological impact of surgery. This paradigm shift is not only changing the way postoperative care is delivered but is also having a profound impact on the way anesthesia is administered. This article explores how the ERAS protocol represents a fundamental change in perioperative care, particularly focusing on its influence on anesthesia practices and the overall postoperative recovery process [1].
ERAS protocols aim to improve surgical outcomes by addressing all aspects of the perioperative care continuum—preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. These protocols are designed to reduce the physiological stress associated with surgery, optimize nutrition, enhance pain control, and promote early mobilization. One of the core principles of ERAS is that a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach is essential for achieving the best outcomes. This involves the active participation of surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, physiotherapists, and dietitians, all working together to optimize care and improve recovery times. The goal is to help patients recover as quickly and comfortably as possible, minimizing complications, reducing hospital stays, and improving overall patient satisfaction [2].
A cornerstone of the ERAS protocol is minimizing opioid use in the postoperative period. Opioid-based pain management has long been the standard approach for managing post-surgical pain, but these medications carry numerous side effects, including nausea, vomiting, constipation, and respiratory depression. In addition, the prolonged use of opioids has led to concerns about dependency and addiction. In response to these issues, the ERAS protocol emphasizes the use of multimodal analgesia, which combines different classes of drugs and techniques to manage pain while minimizing the reliance on opioids. This approach includes the use of non-opioid analgesics like acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), regional anesthesia techniques like nerve blocks, and local anesthetics for direct site infiltration. By providing effective pain relief through a combination of approaches, the need for opioids is significantly reduced, resulting in fewer opioid-related side effects and faster recovery [3].
Anesthesia practices within the ERAS framework also focus on reducing the duration of anesthesia and promoting faster emergence from anesthesia. One key strategy is the use of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), which involves the administration of anesthetic agents through intravenous routes rather than inhalational agents. TIVA has several advantages, including more precise control over anesthetic depth, faster recovery times, and a reduced risk of postoperative complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Propofol, a commonly used intravenous anesthetic, is particularly favored in ERAS protocols because of its rapid onset and clearance from the body, allowing patients to wake up quickly and with less grogginess. By shortening the duration of anesthesia and minimizing the risk of PONV, TIVA facilitates a smoother and quicker recovery for patients, aligning with the principles of ERAS [4].
Another critical aspect of the ERAS protocol is the promotion of early mobilization after surgery. Research has shown that early physical activity can help prevent complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia, while also improving circulation and reducing the risk of muscle atrophy. Within the context of anesthesia, this means that the goal is to use anesthetic agents and techniques that allow for faster recovery of muscle strength and coordination. For instance, regional anesthesia techniques such as epidural anesthesia or nerve blocks can be beneficial for allowing patients to wake up with minimal muscle weakness, facilitating early movement and mobilization. These approaches are especially important in major abdominal, orthopedic, and cardiac surgeries, where early mobilization is a key part of recovery [5].
Another central tenet of ERAS is nutrition optimization before and after surgery. Traditionally, patients were instructed to fast for extended periods before surgery, which could lead to dehydration, muscle breakdown, and delayed postoperative recovery. However, ERAS protocols recommend early oral intake and carbohydrate loading in the preoperative period. Research has shown that providing patients with a carbohydrate-rich drink two to three hours before surgery can reduce insulin resistance, promote glycogen storage, and improve postoperative recovery by enhancing energy reserves. Postoperatively, patients are encouraged to resume eating solid foods as soon as possible to support healing and prevent the complications associated with prolonged fasting [6, 7].
Postoperative care within the ERAS protocol also places a strong emphasis on early extubation (removal of the endotracheal tube) and the avoidance of excessive fluid administration. The goal is to minimize fluid overload, which can increase the risk of complications such as pulmonary edema and cardiovascular stress. By optimizing fluid management, the risk of postoperative complications is reduced, and recovery is accelerated. Moreover, early extubation reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and shortens recovery times by allowing the patient to breathe independently sooner [8, 9].
The psychological aspect of recovery is another important focus within ERAS. The stress of surgery and the hospital environment can contribute to anxiety and delayed recovery. ERAS protocols encourage the use of patient education and anxiety-reducing techniques in the preoperative period to help patients feel more informed and prepared for surgery. Additionally, providing a supportive environment, minimizing unnecessary hospital stays, and promoting early discharge all contribute to improved patient satisfaction and psychological well-being [10].
Conclusion
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) represents a comprehensive and innovative approach to perioperative care that is changing the landscape of anesthesia and postoperative recovery. By emphasizing multimodal analgesia, minimizing opioid use, optimizing anesthesia techniques, and promoting early mobilization, ERAS has proven to be an effective strategy for accelerating recovery, reducing complications, and improving patient outcomes. The collaborative, patient-centered approach to care that underpins ERAS is not only improving the surgical experience for patients but also shifting the way anesthesiologists and healthcare providers view the recovery process. As more hospitals and surgical centers adopt ERAS protocols, we can expect to see even greater improvements in patient care, faster recovery times, and reduced healthcare costs, ultimately reshaping the future of postoperative care and anesthesia.
References
- El Shora HA, El Beleehy AA, Abdelwahab AA, et al. Bilateral paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural analgesia for pain control post-cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(05):410-6.
- Devarajan J, Balasubramanian S, Nazarnia S, et al. Regional Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery Part 1. Current status of neuraxial and paravertebral blocks for adult cardiac surgery.. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;25(4)252-64.
- Mumtaz H, Saqib M, Ansar F, et al. The future of cardiothoracic surgery: Artificial intelligence?. Ann Med. 2022;104-251.
- Ramakrishna H, Fassl J, Sinha A, et al. The year in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia: selected highlights from 2009. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24(1):7-17.
- Augoustides JG. The year in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia: selected highlights from 2008. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(1):1-7.
- Caiano LM, Riva N, Carrier M, et al. Treatment of portal vein thrombosis: an updated narrative review. . Minerva Med. 2021;112(6):713-25.
- Wang CL, Asch D, Cavallo J, et al. Statement from the ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media on the intravenous iodinated contrast media shortage.. J Am Coll Radiol.2022;19(7):834-5.
- Fox ER, Sweet BV, Jensen V. Drug shortages: a complex health care crisis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(3): 361-73.
- Bina B, Hersh EV, Hilario M, et al. True allergy to amide local anesthetics: a review and case presentation.. Anesth Prog. 2018;65(2):119-23.
- Schuster NM, Ahadian FM, Zhao Z,et al. Best practices for interventional pain procedures in the setting of an iodinated contrast media shortage: A multisociety practice advisory . Interv Pain Med. 2022;1(3):100-22.
Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref