Journal of Fisheries Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Perspective - Journal of Fisheries Research (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

Ecosystem-Based Management Approaches for Small-Scale Fisheries

Claire Whitmore*

Marine Research Institute, University of St Andrews, UK.

*Corresponding Author:
Claire Whitmore
Marine Research Institute
University of St Andrews, UK.
E-mail: ombamalu@uwc.ac.za

Received: 03-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-157849; Editor assigned: 04-Feb-2025, PreQC No. AAJFR-25-157849(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Feb-2025, QC No AAJFR-25-157849; Revised: 21-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AAJFR-25-157849(R); Published: 28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/aajfr-9.1.255

Citation: Whitmore C. Ecosystem-based management approaches for small-scale fisheries. J Fish Res. 2025;9(1):255.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries Research

Introduction

Ecosystem-based management (EBM) approaches have become increasingly recognized as a critical strategy for the sustainable management of small-scale fisheries. These fisheries, often characterized by their reliance on local knowledge, community-based management, and low-impact fishing techniques, play a vital role in providing food security, employment, and cultural identity for millions of people worldwide [1]. However, small-scale fisheries are facing significant challenges from overfishing, habitat degradation, and the impacts of climate change. EBM offers a comprehensive framework that considers the entire ecosystem, including fish stocks, habitats, biodiversity, and human activities, to promote long-term sustainability [2].

At the heart of EBM is the understanding that ecosystems are interconnected, and human activities cannot be managed in isolation from their environmental context. For small-scale fisheries, this means that management decisions should not only focus on regulating fish catch but also on preserving the broader ecosystem that supports fish populations. This includes protecting critical habitats, such as coral reefs, mangroves, and seagrasses, which provide essential services such as breeding grounds, shelter, and food for many species [3].

One key principle of EBM is the recognition of the multiple and often competing demands placed on marine and coastal resources. Small-scale fisheries, tourism, agriculture, and industrial development all interact with the ecosystem, and these interactions must be considered in decision-making processes [4]. EBM encourages the participation of local communities and stakeholders in the management process, ensuring that the knowledge and needs of fishers are incorporated into policy development. By involving local communities in decision-making, EBM helps to foster ownership, promote compliance with regulations, and build resilience against external pressures [5].

Ecosystem-based management also emphasizes the importance of maintaining ecosystem services that support fish populations. For example, healthy coastal ecosystems like mangroves and wetlands serve as natural filters, improving water quality and reducing the impact of pollution on fish habitats [6]. By implementing EBM, small-scale fisheries can benefit from enhanced biodiversity, improved water quality, and greater resilience to climate change, which ultimately supports the sustainability of fish stocks [7].

Adaptive management is another crucial component of EBM, especially in the context of small-scale fisheries. Because ecosystems are constantly changing and subject to various pressures, management strategies must be flexible and capable of adapting to new information or shifting conditions. Monitoring and data collection are essential for adaptive management, as they provide the information needed to assess the health of fish populations, the status of habitats, and the effectiveness of management measures. Through continuous feedback, fishery managers can adjust regulations, such as catch limits or seasonal closures, to ensure that they are meeting ecological and social objectives [8].

One of the challenges in implementing EBM in small-scale fisheries is the lack of sufficient scientific data and resources, particularly in developing countries where these fisheries are most prevalent. However, EBM recognizes the value of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), which has been developed over generations by local communities. Integrating TEK with scientific knowledge can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the ecosystem and improve management practices. In many cases, small-scale fishers have detailed knowledge of fish behavior, migration patterns, and local environmental conditions, which can complement modern scientific research and contribute to more effective management strategies [9].

An example of successful EBM implementation can be seen in the coastal areas of the Philippines, where community-based marine protected areas (MPAs) have been established to protect key fish habitats. These MPAs are managed by local communities, with input from fishers and other stakeholders, and have led to significant increases in fish populations, biodiversity, and local incomes. By incorporating the principles of EBM, these initiatives have enhanced ecosystem health and provided long-term benefits for both fish populations and the people who depend on them [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, ecosystem-based management approaches provide a holistic and integrated framework for managing small-scale fisheries, recognizing the complex interactions between fish populations, habitats, and human activities. By considering the entire ecosystem and promoting community participation, EBM offers a pathway to sustainable fisheries that can support both environmental conservation and the livelihoods of local communities. While challenges remain, such as limited data and resources, the integration of traditional ecological knowledge with scientific research offers promising solutions for enhancing the resilience of small-scale fisheries. Through adaptive management and a focus on ecosystem health, small-scale fisheries can thrive in the face of environmental pressures, ensuring food security, biodiversity, and sustainable livelihoods for future generations.

References

  1. Arreguín-Sánchez F. Catchability: a key parameter for fish stock assessment. Rev Fish Biol. 1996;6:221-42.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Patterson K, Cook R, Darby C, et al. Estimating uncertainty in fish stock assessment and forecasting. Fish and fisheries. 2001;2(2):125-57.

    3. Google Scholar

  3. Maunder MN, Punt AE. A review of integrated analysis in fisheries stock assessment. Fish Res. 2013;142:61-74.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Lleonart J, Maynou F. Fish stock assessments in the Mediterranean: state of the art. Sci Mar. 2003;67(S1):37-49.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Begg GA, Friedland KD, Pearce JB. Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fish Res. 1999;43(1-3):1-8.

    6. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Punt AE, Hilborn RA. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1997;7:35-63.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Maunder MN, Piner KR. Contemporary fisheries stock assessment: many issues still remain. ICES J Mar Sci. 2015;72(1):7-18.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Cadrin SX. Defining spatial structure for fishery stock assessment. Fish Res. 2020;221:105397.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Gulland JA. Manual of methods for fish stock assessment. Part 1. Fish population analysis. Statistics. 1969;2:5.

    10. Google Scholar

  10. Francis RC. Data weighting in statistical fisheries stock assessment models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011;68(6):1124-38.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App