Addiction & Criminology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Commentary - Addiction & Criminology (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1

Drug Dependence and Crime: Understanding the Cycle of Substance Abuse and Offending.

Rachel Brown *

School of Psychology, Ulster University, UK

*Corresponding Author:
Rachel Brown
School of Psychology, Ulster University, UK
E-mail: r.brown@ulster.ac.uk

Received: 02-Feb -2025, Manuscript No. AARA-25-161186; Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2025, PreQC No. AARA-25-161186 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Feb-2024, QC No. AARA-25-161186; Revised:21-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. AARA-25-161186 (R); Published:28-Feb-2025, DOI:10.35841/aara-8.1.247

Citation: Brown R. Drug dependence and crime: Understanding the cycle of substance abuse and offending. Addict Criminol.2025;8(1):247

Visit for more related articles at Addiction & Criminology

Abstract

  

Introduction

Drug dependence and crime are closely linked, creating a cycle that is difficult to break. Substance abuse often leads to criminal behavior, either due to the effects of drugs on judgment and behavior or the need to commit crimes to support addiction. Conversely, involvement in the criminal justice system can exacerbate substance use disorders (SUDs) by limiting access to treatment and increasing social marginalization. Understanding this cycle is crucial for developing effective interventions and policies that address both addiction and crime. This article explores the complex relationship between drug dependence and crime, the factors driving this connection, and potential solutions [1].

Drug dependence contributes to crime in several ways. First, illicit drug use itself is a criminal offense in many jurisdictions. However, beyond drug possession and trafficking, individuals with SUDs may engage in other criminal activities, including theft, violence, and prostitution, to sustain their addiction. Drugs also impair cognitive functions, leading to impulsive and reckless behaviors that increase the likelihood of violent crimes [2].

Additionally, research indicates that individuals with drug dependence are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, approximately 65% of U.S. inmates have a substance use disorder. Without proper rehabilitation, many of these individuals re-offend upon release, perpetuating the cycle of drug-related crime [3].

Poverty, lack of education, and unemployment are strongly associated with both substance abuse and criminal behaviour. Individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds may turn to drugs as a coping mechanism or resort to crime to meet financial needs [4].

Many individuals with SUDs also suffer from co-occurring mental health conditions, such as depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These conditions can increase the likelihood of both substance use and criminal involvement [5].

Exposure to drug-using or criminal peers significantly increases the likelihood of engaging in similar behaviors. Adolescents and young adults are particularly vulnerable to peer pressure and may adopt substance use and criminal activities as part of their social identity [6].

Harsh drug laws and punitive criminal justice approaches often fail to address the root causes of addiction. Incarceration without access to treatment leads to high recidivism rates, as individuals re-enter society without the necessary support to break free from drug dependence [7].

The criminal justice system plays a significant role in either perpetuating or mitigating the cycle of drug-related crime. Traditional punitive approaches, such as mandatory minimum sentences and the war on drugs, have been criticized for disproportionately targeting marginalized communities and failing to reduce drug-related crime [8].

However, alternative approaches show promise. Drug courts, for example, offer rehabilitation-focused solutions, combining judicial oversight with treatment programs to help offenders overcome addiction rather than simply punishing them. Research indicates that participants in drug courts have lower recidivism rates compared to those in traditional court systems [9].

Providing evidence-based treatment programs, including medication-assisted treatment (MAT), counseling, and behavioral therapies, can help individuals recover from addiction and reduce criminal behavior. Programs that address social determinants of health, such as housing, employment, and education, can reduce the risk of both substance use and criminal activity [10].

conclusion

The connection between drug dependence and crime is deeply intertwined, driven by socioeconomic, psychological, and legal factors. While punitive approaches have historically dominated drug policy, evidence suggests that treatment-based and rehabilitative strategies are more effective in reducing recidivism and improving public safety. By implementing comprehensive interventions that address both substance use disorders and the underlying causes of criminal behavior, society can break the cycle and create pathways for recovery and reintegration.

References

  1. Deitch D, Koutsenok I, Ruiz A. The relationship between crime and drugs: What we have learned in recent decades. J Psychoact Drugs. 2000;32(4):391-7.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Gossop M, Roy A. Hostility, crime and drug dependence. Br J Psychiatry. 1977;130(3):272-8.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Simpson M. The relationship between drug use and crime: A puzzle inside an enigma. Int J Drug Policy. 2003;14(4):307-19.

    4. Google Scholar

  4. Bennett T, Holloway K, Farrington D. The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 2008;13(2):107-18.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Facchin F, Margola D. Researching lived experience of drugs and crime: A phenomenological study of drug-dependent inmates. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(12):1627-37.

    6. Google Scholar

  6. Nurco DN. A long-term program of research on drug use and crime. Subst Use Misuse. 1998;33(9):1817-37.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Hammersley R. Pathways through drugs and crime: Desistance, trauma and resilience. J Crim Just. 2011;39(3):268-72.

    8. Google Scholar

  8. Manly JT, Oshri A, Lynch M, Herzog M, Wortel S. Child neglect and the development of externalizing behavior problems: Associations with maternal drug dependence and neighborhood crime. Child Maltreat. 2013;18(1):17-29.

    9. Google Scholar

  9. Gossop M. Drug dependence, crime and personality among female addicts. Drug and Alcohol Dep. 1978;3(5):359-64.

    10. Google Scholar

  10. Anglin MD, Perrochet B. Drug use and crime: A historical review of research conducted by the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center. Subs Use Misuse. 1998;33(9):1871-914.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App