Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Reach Us +44-7897-074717

Research Article - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2023) Volume 7, Issue 4

Disease intensity with the help of GIS technology in the tribal area of Nashik district, Maharashtra (India)

Dnyaneshwar S. Suryawanshi1*, Jagdish D. Wetal2 and Asha M. Kate3

1Department of Geography, VWS Arts, Commerce &Science College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India

2Department of Geography, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

3Department of Geography,VWS Arts, Commerce & Science College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India

Corresponding Author:
Dnyaneshwar S. Suryawanshi
Department of Geography, VWS Arts
Commerce &Science, College, Dhule
Maharashtra, India.
E-mail:
dssvws@rediffmail.com

Received: 10-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-23-91114; Editor assigned: 15-Mar-2023, PreQC No. AAPHPP-23-91114 (PQ); Reviewed: 25-Mar-2023, QC No. AAPHPP-23-91114; Revised: 23-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-23-91114 (R); Published: 03-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aaphpp- 7.4.181

Citation: Suryawanshi DS. Disease intensity with the help of GIS technology in the tribal area of Nashik district, Maharashtra (India). J Public Health Policy Plan. 2023;7(4):181

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

Kendal's rating co-efficient approach is used to determine the severity of diseases. In a primary health centre, illness-specific morbidity rates are translated into fractions of the sum for particular disease. On the basis of these percentages, all primary health centres are arranged in decreasing order under the heading of each disease individually, and the percentage statistics are then translated into classes, i.e., each primary health centre is assigned a category of each disease (Suryawanshi D. S 2005). Finally, all of a primary health centre’s ranks are added together. The number of diseases prevalent in that primary health centre is separated by the total of grades, and the overall rating co-efficient value is calculated with help of the diseases ranking co-efficient value of primary health centre. For demarcating the disease intensity region disease ranking coefficient values RC1, RC2, RC3…….RCn are grouped into four classes according to quartiles. These classes are high intensity, moderately higher intensity, moderate intensity and low disease intensity.

Keywords

Disease Intensity, PHC ranking, Ranking co-efficient, Relief divisions.

Introduction

The tribal residents of the designated geographic area live in forested and steep terrain with limited access. One of the major public health issues confronting these indigenous populations is sickness. The Anthropological Survey of India [1] conducted studies on the prevalence and distribution of the illness trait, which can affect up to 35% of the tribes. According to studies, the prevalence of illness traits in the nation ranges from 10 to 40%.Due to changes in disease patterns, improvements in the infrastructure for nutrition and health, the elimination and control of major killer illnesses, and socioeconomic development, India has seen a significant epidemiological transformation since gaining its independence. But despite these health advancements, self-governance has only lasted for over 60 years. Due to widespread poverty, differences in state development, gender discrimination, an ageing population, and the inability of government initiatives to address the ruralurban divide in terms of health facility supply in the public and private sectors, the burden of disease is still significant [2].

Study Region

The study area is located in the north-western part of the Nashik District. It extends from 190 44' 57'' to 200 43' 55'' north latitudes and 730 14' 05'' to 730 06' 57'' east longitudes. Study area covers an area of 4581.98 sq. km., which is 29.40 % of the geographical area of the district. It is surrounded by Deola and Chandwad tehsil in the east and the north-east, Gujarat state in the north, Palghar districts of Maharashtra State to the south-west, Igatpuri tehsil to the south [3,4]. It consists of 05 tehsils, namely Peint, Dindori, Surgana, Kalwan and Trimabkeshwar. The population of the region is 976092. It includes 760 villages and 40 PHC in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The population of the region.

Objective

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the disease intensity in the tribal of north-western part of the Nashik District. The following objectives are kept in mind in order to achieve the study's goal.

1) To study the infected by diseases in the primary health centers.

2) To analyze the disease intensity in the study region [5].

Material, Methods & Samplings

Statistical and cartographic techniques have been used for the research work to precise conclusions. The number of diseases prevalent in that primary health centre is separated by the total of grades, and the overall rating co-efficient value is calculated using the method below.

Whereas,

RC1 = the diseases ranking co-efficient value of primary health centre 1

Dr1, Dr2, Dr3, Drn= are the ranks occupied by the primary health centre 1 for diseases r1, r2, r3, rn.

N= is the total number of diseases taken into consideration in a primary health centre.

For demarcating the disease intensity region disease ranking co-efficient values RC1, RC2, RC3…….RCn are grouped into four classes according to quartiles. These classes are given as follows.

1) High Intensity: Less than Q1 (Less than 9.65)

2) Moderately higher disease intensity: Q1 to Q2 (9.65 to 14.44)

3) Moderate disease intensity: Q2 to Q3 (14.44 to 17.15)

4) Low disease intensity: More than Q3 (More than 17.15)

It may be pointed out here that, the lower the ranking coefficient values, higher the disease intensity and higher the ranking co-efficient value, the lower the disease intensity. A percentage of primary health centres categorized according to relief units and disease severity classes in order to consider the extent of disease incidence. Through the sample village survey, total of 115 villages are chosen, and 23 villages from the list of ITDP villages have randomly chosen in each tehsil. By using a probability proportional to the size of the various tribes, a total of 10 households (HHs) from each chosen village have been covered. For this reason, households in each village are divided into groups based on tribe, and the necessary numbers of households from each tribe are included in the survey [6,7]. The poll is conducted over a 12-month period to capture seasonal change. Due to a lack of data, information on these factors at the tribal level could not be obtained directly from secondary sources, necessitating a detailed fieldwork in 115 villages and 1140 households.

Result and Discussion

Kendal's rating co-efficient approach is used to determine the severity of diseases. In a primary health centre, illnessspecific morbidity rates are translated into fractions of the sum for particular disease. In the basis of these percentages, all primary health centres are arranged in decreasing order under the heading of each disease individually, and the percentage statistics are then translated into classes, i.e., each primary health centre is assigned a category of each disease. Finally, all of a primary health centre’s ranks are added together [8,9 ]. The number of diseases prevalent in that primary health centre is separated by the total of grades, and the overall rating co-efficient value is calculated using the method.The goal of the current study was to ascertain the prevalence of illness intensity disorder among the tribal residents of the Nashik District and to calculate the disease's overall economic burden.

A study of disease ranking is highly valuable in determining the distributional pattern of disease in a given area since it gives a sense of the relative dominance of various diseases in order of importance [10]. In this study, diseases were ranked according to their relative strength, which was determined by the morbidity and infected area caused by each disease.

According to the total number of morbidity cases of hyper tension, dysentery, scabies, anemia, amoebiasis, fever, malaria, gastro, diarrhea, and malnutrition were the most common diseases in the research area. All of the diseases prevalent in the area are divided into four categories. The disorders in the first three orders are regarded as significant illnesses. Hyper tension, scabies, diabetes mellitus, malaria, diarrhea and typhoid are among the diseases covered [11, 12]. The disorders that fall into the fourth order have a moderate level of morbidity. Intestinal disorders such as dysentery, leprosy, anemia, sickle cell, gastro and digestive diseases are among them. Other diseases account for a small percentage of morbidity cases (Table 1).

PHC Hyper Tension Scabies Diabetes Miletus Malaria Typhoid Diarrhea Dysentery Gastro Leprocy Gastritis Anemia Fungus Sickle Cell Fever Malnutrition Asthma Amebiasis Hepatitis Pneumonia TB Delivery BP RTA UTI Alcohol Dengue Sum of Ranks Number of Disease   Rank of Co-efficient value Ranks
Kulwandi  - 26 20 12 6 1 - 17 27.5 - 34 - 23 - 4 - -  -  -  - 23 27  -  -  - 10 230.5 13   17.73 8
Jogmodi 21 35 28 22 13 21 10 13 15  -  -  - 5 - 9 2 1  -  -  - 22 25  -  - 4 - 246 16   15.38 18
Kumbhale 1 32  -  - 27.5 29 25 25 32 - 33 22 8 21 23  -  - 8  -  14 26  -  -  -  -  - 326.5 15   21.77 3
Ambe 12 19 13 2 4 24  -  -  -  - 23  -  -  - 5 5 19  -  - 13 1 13.5 1  -  -  - 154.5 14   11.04 36
Karanjali 30 33 21 21 - 16 - 8 22 - 31.5 4 2 2 16  -  -  -  -  -  - 20.5 - 13  -  - 240 14   17.14 10
Bhuawan 23 25 29 33 1 - 20 22 18 - 12.5  -  - 4 13.5 1 3  -  - 12 - 15.5  -  -  - 6.5 239 16   14.94 20
Kohar  - 34 30 1 22 14 12 18 21 8 35  -  11 16 20 6 17  -  -  - 3 - 10 12 3 - 293 19   15.42 17
Peint (RH)  - 7 - 14 11 26 7 11 24 3 16 19 - - - 9 11 6 3  -  -  - 18  -  - 3 181 17   10.65 38
Talegaon 8 16 6 27 9 - 8 - 16  - 21 - - 20 31 21 - 2 -  - 4 - 20 1 -  - 210 15   14 28
Ware 5 40 2 25 - 27 13 26 29  - - 17 13 - 35 - - 11 - 2 5 19 - 8 12  - 289 17   17 12
Varkhede 26 1 - 23 12 31 22 14 25 5 29 - - 18 37 7 9 - - - 15.5 - 14  -  -  - 288.5 16   18.03 6
Umrale 18 24 11 30 - 5 9 10 12 - 15 18 21 8 36 - 2 1 - 11 - 18  -  - 5  - 254 18   14.11 27
Nanashi  - 10  - - 3 17 3 1 - 2 25  -  -   v 30 -  -  -  -  - 13 7  -  -  -  - 111 10   11.1 35
Nigdol 27 36  - 9 - - 1 - 9 1 3  - 9 10 38 23 14  -  - 1  - - 17  -  -  - 198 14   14.14 26
Mohadi 6 4 1 35 27.5 19 27 27 31  - 30  -  -   - 42  - - 4  -  -  - 24 - 5 11 2 295.5 16   18.47 4
Pandhane  - 17.5 24 7 7.5 11.5 4.5 - 17  - 8 10 4  - 34  - 20  -  -  - 15.5 - 9  -  -  - 189.5 14   13.54 31
Khedgaon 31 2 - 20 10 25 32 16 27.5 6 - - -  - 39 24 15 - 5 3  -  -  -  -  -  - 255.5 14   18.25 5
Kochargaon 33 - 27 28 32 30 33 - - 31.5 - 24 6 41 -  - 7 11   24.5 26 - 10.5 13  - 377.5 16   23.59 1
Dindori (RH) 2 38 3 36 30 28 21 28 30 12 20 23 18 19 40 16 27  -  -  - 21 - 16  -  -  - 428 19   22.53 2
Borgaon 14 11 16 19   8 23 9 - - 7 8 19 - 19 22 6  -  - 9 - 20.5 19  -  -  - 229.5 16   14.34 24
Umbarthan 20 37 8 34 17 - - - 5 14 5 - 7 17 8 - 8 16 10 - 18 28 - 15  -  - 267 17   15.71 15
Barhe 24 31 9 31 25 20 28 20 4 15 - 15 - 5 17 20  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 9 6.5 279.5 16   17.47 9
Mani 28 29 - 37 31 6 19 23 7 - 6 16 3 - 2 - 4 14 13 - 7 22.5 8 6  -  - 281.5 19   14.82 21
Mankhed  - 17.5 14 - 14 - 4.5 - 3 11 22 14 - 1 1 13  -  - - 5  -  -  - 9 6 - 135 14   9.64 40
Bubali 7 22 - 6 15 4 - 5  -  -  -  - 20 - 3 10  -  - 9  - 12 1 - - - 1 115 13   8.85 41
Surgana (RH) 3 41 5 29 29 - 36 - 26 19 28 2 25 3 32.5 17 7 17 -  - 14 - 2 14 8  - 357.5 20   17.88 7
Jaidar - 14 18 5  - 3 - 4 10 - 1 - - 12 26.5 - 24 15 8  - 20 6 -  -  -  - 166.5 14   11.89 33
Dalwat 9 23 12 32  - - 14 - - 7 19 3 1 - 32.5 18 - -  -  - - 17 6  -  - 5 198.5 14   14.18 25
Tirhol 25 39 - 8 2 18 2 6 14 13   13 - 22 29  - 25 12  - 15 24.5 22.5  -  -  -  - 290 17   17.06 11
Kanashi 17 5 10 - 16 - 6 3  - - 24 - -  - 13.5  - - - 2 6 - 10.5  -  -  -  - 113 11   10.27 39
Nandori 16 20 - 11 - 2 26 - 8 18 11 5 15  - 21  - 22 10  -  - 17 - 15  -  -  - 217 15   14.47 22
Umbargavhan 9 15 3 7.5 11.5 30 2 23 - 17 - - 15 24 19 26 -  -  - - 4.5 -  - 10  - 216.5 15   14.43 23
Otur 4 - - 4 5 - 15.5 - - - 10 1 10 - 22 3.5 - -  -  - 8.5 13.5 7  - -  - 104 12   8.67 42
Mokhbhangi - 27 26 17 26 22 24 21 1 10 - 9 - 9 26.5 - 21 18 7 7 - 15.5 - 16 7 9 319 20   15.95 14
Navi Bej 13 12 7 - 23 7 17 - - 9 4 - 17 18 12 16 - -  - 6 - 13 4  -  - 178 15   11.87 34
Abhona (RH) 29 30 17 15 - 15 - 19 19 16 27 12 16 7 11 8 23 13 4  - 8.5 3 12  -  -  - 304.5 20   15.23 19
Amboli 15 15 19 13 33 13 29 15 6  - - 11 22 - 25 - 18 9 -  - 19 12 4  - 2  - 280 18   15.56 16
Chinchohal 19 13 23 24 18.5 - 34 12 - 21 18 - 12 14 10 3.5 - 5 6 10 - 8  - 7  - 8 266 19   14 29
Shirasgaon 32 6 25 16 18.5 10 - 7 11 - - 6 -  - 12 - 12 - 12 - 10 4.5  - 3  -  - 185 15   12.33 32
Thanapada 10 28 - 26 24 9 18  - 20 20 12.5 7 6  - 7 14 10 - - 8 - 10.5 5 -  -  - 235 17   13.82 30
Rohile - 3 - 18 -  - 31  - 2 - 2 -  - 13 15  -  - 3 1 16 11 2 - 2 1  - 120 14   8.57 43
Girnare 11 8 4 10 21  - 15.5  - - 4 26 21  - - 6 15 13  -  - - 2 - 3 - - 4 163.5 15   10.9 37
Trimbak 22 21 22   20 23 35  - 13 17 9 20 14 11 28 11 5  -  - 4 - 9 11 10.5  -  - 305.5 19   16.08 13

Table 1. Tribal Tehsil of Nashik District: PHC wise disease rank intensity and ranking of PHC according to ranking Co-efficient

The Table 2 and Figure 2 show that diseases are more intense in areas over 400 to 500 meters in altitude. Figure 2 show that the ranking co-efficient in the tribal region is smaller, implying that disease incidence is higher in these areas. Diseases of a large incidence can often be seen in high-lying regions with an altitude of 600 to 700 meters. Around a quarter of the disease severity is in this region [13]. The More than 700 m. altitudinal area often suffers from high intensity illness, according to a 10% rating co-efficient. This indicates that this area has a large prevalence of diseases. Since the current area is upland or mountainous in nature, disease incidence seems to be somewhat consistent. This explains why diseases are bound to strike the tribal areas of Nashik district.

Relief Division No. of PHC Higher intensity
Less than Q1
Moderately high (Q1-Q2) Moderate Intensity (Q2-Q3) Low Intensity (More than Q3)
300 to 400 m. 04 - 75 25 -
400 to 500 m. 07 14.28 14.28 42.85 28.57
500 to 600 m. 04 - 25 50 25
600 to 700 m. 18 11.11 33.33 22.22 33.33
More than 700 m. 10 10 50 40 -

Table 2. Tribal Tehsil of Nashik District: Disease Intensity According to Relief Divisions (Figures in %)

Figure 2: The ranking co-efficient in the tribal region.

The Varkhede and khedgaon primary health center’s service area is located in a lower altitudinal region, with a higher concentration of population, a high degree of crowding, and an unhygienic way of life, all of which contribute to the spread of contagious diseases such as scabies. Nigdol and Nanashi receive a significantly higher amount of rainfall [14,15]. As a result, the occurrence of dysentery is clearly increased in this primary health center. Tirhol and Mankhed, on the other hand, are located in a high mountainous area. The area was meant to be densely forested, but due to illegal deforestation, it has become barren, causing an ecological imbalance. Fever may develop in the affected area as a result of the disease.

The region is primarily affected by intestinal infectious disorders such as diarrhea, typhoid, gastro, and amoebiasis. Amoebiasis is found in every corner of the world and is one of the most common health concerns among tribal people in the research region, with a much higher incidence rate. The reasons for the high occurrence rate of amoebiasis in these locations are clear: contaminated water, tribals' unclean habits, ingestion of raw vegetables and meals, and so on [16].

Conclusion

The measure of illness intensity aids in determining the degree of disease prevalence in a given location. The intensity of diseases in the studied region is often high due to unfavorable physio-socio-economic variables. The illness intensity explanation demonstrates that the study area is prone to a variety of diseases. They are also classified according to how much of the world they infect. According to this classification, hyper tension, scabies, diabetes mellitus, and malaria are more common in areas with a population of more than 36%.More than 30% of the area is infected with typhoid, dysentery, diarrhea and gastro. Other diseases that cover less than 30% of the overall geographical region may also be considered important. These ailments include anemia, fungus, sickle cell, malnutrition and asthma problems. Those diseases are span less than half of the study area, while not widespread; have concentrated impacts in a few pockets.

References

  1. Aparajita C, Ramanakumar AV. Burden of disease in rural India: An analysis through cause of death. The Internet journal of third world medicine. 2005;2(2):43-8.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Bhat J, Rao VG, Gopi PG, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis amongst the tribal population of Madhya Pradesh, central India. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(4):1026-32.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Cristaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany, Translated by CW Baskin.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Howe GM. Aworld geography of human diseases. Academic Press Inc.(London) Ltd., 24/28 Oval Road, London NW1 7DX.; 1977.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. An IC. Task Force Study. New Delhi: ICMR; 1989. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). Epidemiological survey of endemic goitre and endemic cretinism.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Jadhav Satish & Suryawanshi D.S. Epidemiology of Malaria in Jalgaon District, Maharashtra, India (2004-2009). Trans Inst Indian Geographers. 2011;33(2):211-16
  12. Kendall MG. The geographical distribution of crop productivity in England. J R Stat Soc. 1939;102(1):21-62.
  13. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  14. Mishra RP. Nutrition and health in India AD–1950–2000. Geographical Aspects of Health and Disease in India. 1985:247-8.
  15. Google Scholar

  16. Misra R. P. Medical Geography of India. 1970.
  17. Wetal JD, Awhad MA, Suryawanshi DS, Suryawaanshi MV. Spatial Analysis of Area Influence of Primary Health Centres in the Tribal Tehsil of Nashik District. 2022;8(3): 813-1142.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Park K. Park's textbook of preventive and social medicine. Jabalpur. Banarasidas Bhanot. 2011;463.
  20. Google Scholar

  21. Rao VR. Genetics and epidemiology of sickle cell anemia in India. Indian J Med Sci. 1988;42(9):218-22.
  22. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  23. Srivastava S. Medical Geography of Saryupar Plain. Institute of Rural Eco-Development; 1993.
  24. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  25. Suryawanshi DS. Geographical Epidemiology, Jaipur. 2005.
  26. Suryawanshi DS. Geographical Transmission of Common Cold and Diarrhea in Jalgaon City: An Analysis with the Help of GIS. 2021; 38(1):27-35.
  27. Google Scholar

  28. Wetal MJ, Suryawanshi DS, Patil BS. Review of Literature of Geo-Health Issues in Tribal Areas of 21 Century. 2021; 2(4):63-66
  29. Google Scholar

Get the App