Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Opinion Article - Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4

CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated genome editing: A revolution in plant genetic engineering

Julianne W. Lee *

Department of Agroecology, University of California, Davis, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Julianne W. Lee
Department of Agroecology, University of California, Davis, USA
E-mail: jwlee@ucdavis.edu

Received: 25-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AAASCB-24-144054; Editor assigned: 27-Jul-2024, PreQC No. AAASCB-24-144054; Reviewed:10-Aug-2024, QC No. AAASCB-24-144054; Revised:16-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAASCB-24-144054; Published:22-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/ aaascb-8.4.247

Citation: W. Lee J. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated genome editing: A revolution in plant genetic engineering. J Agric Sci Bot. 2023; 8(4):247

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Agricultural Science and Botany

Introduction

CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing has emerged as a revolutionary tool in the field of plant genetic engineering, offering unprecedented precision, efficiency, and versatility in modifying plant genomes. Since its discovery, CRISPR-Cas9 has transformed the way scientists approach genetic manipulation, enabling targeted changes to DNA sequences that were once difficult, if not impossible, to achieve. This technology has opened up new possibilities for crop improvement, with the potential to address global challenges such as food security, climate change, and sustainable agriculture [1].

The CRISPR-Cas9 system, originally derived from the adaptive immune system of bacteria, has been adapted for use in a wide range of organisms, including plants. The system works by using a guide RNA (gRNA) to direct the Cas9 enzyme to a specific location in the genome, where it introduces a double-strand break. The cell’s natural DNA repair mechanisms then take over, allowing scientists to introduce specific mutations, insertions, or deletions at the target site. This precision and ease of use make CRISPR-Cas9 a powerful tool for plant genetic engineering [2].

Before the advent of CRISPR-Cas9, plant genetic engineering relied on older techniques such as transgenic approaches and chemical mutagenesis, which were often time-consuming, less precise, and associated with regulatory challenges. While these methods have contributed significantly to agricultural biotechnology, they often involved random integration of foreign DNA or induced mutations that could have unintended effects. CRISPR-Cas9 overcomes these limitations by allowing precise and targeted genetic modifications, reducing the risk of off-target effects and enabling more predictable outcomes [3].

One of the key advantages of CRISPR-Cas9 is its ability to create site-specific mutations, which can be used to study gene function or develop crops with desirable traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, or enhanced nutritional content. By knocking out or altering specific genes, researchers can uncover the roles of these genes in plant growth and development, leading to a deeper understanding of plant biology and the genetic basis of important agricultural traits. This knowledge is crucial for developing crops that can thrive in challenging environments [4].

The versatility of CRISPR-Cas9 extends beyond simple gene knockouts; it can also be used for more complex genetic modifications, such as gene insertion, gene replacement, or base editing. These advanced applications enable the introduction of beneficial traits from other species, correction of deleterious mutations, or even the precise alteration of individual nucleotides within a gene. This level of control is particularly valuable for plant breeders and geneticists, as it allows for the fine-tuning of crop traits to meet specific agricultural needs [5].

CRISPR-Cas9 has also accelerated the process of crop domestication and improvement, allowing for the rapid development of new crop varieties that are better suited to modern agricultural practices and consumer preferences. Traditional breeding methods, while effective, are often slow and limited by the genetic diversity available within a species. CRISPR-Cas9 bypasses these limitations by enabling the direct modification of genes responsible for key traits, thereby speeding up the breeding process and expanding the range of genetic variation that can be harnessed [6].

The application of CRISPR-Cas9 in plant genetic engineering is not limited to major staple crops like rice, wheat, and maize; it is also being used to improve a wide variety of horticultural and specialty crops. These include fruits, vegetables, and ornamental plants, where CRISPR-Cas9 is being employed to enhance qualities such as flavor, shelf life, pest resistance, and aesthetic appeal. This broad applicability underscores the transformative impact of CRISPR-Cas9 across the entire agricultural sector [7].

Despite its many advantages, the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in plant genetic engineering is not without challenges and controversies. One of the primary concerns is the potential for off-target effects, where unintended genetic changes occur at sites other than the intended target. While advancements in CRISPR technology have significantly reduced these risks, ongoing research is focused on improving the specificity and accuracy of the system to ensure that genetic modifications are safe and predictable [8].

Another challenge lies in the regulatory landscape surrounding CRISPR-Cas9-modified crops, which varies widely across different countries and regions. Some countries, like the United States, have adopted a more permissive stance, treating CRISPR-edited crops similarly to conventionally bred varieties, especially if no foreign DNA is introduced. In contrast, other regions, such as the European Union, have imposed stricter regulations, classifying CRISPR-edited crops as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). These differing regulatory approaches have significant implications for the development and commercialization of CRISPR-Cas9 crops globally [9].

Ethical considerations also play a role in the ongoing debate over the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in agriculture, particularly regarding issues of biodiversity, food sovereignty, and the potential impact on smallholder farmers. While CRISPR-Cas9 offers tremendous potential for improving crop yields and resilience, there are concerns that its benefits may be unequally distributed, favoring large agribusinesses over small-scale farmers. Ensuring that the technology is accessible and beneficial to all stakeholders is a critical aspect of its responsible use [10].

conclusion

CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing represents a paradigm shift in plant genetic engineering, offering powerful tools to meet the growing demands of global agriculture. As the technology continues to evolve, its applications in crop improvement are expected to expand, driving innovations that could lead to more sustainable, resilient, and nutritious crops. However, realizing the full potential of CRISPR-Cas9 will require addressing the associated technical, regulatory, and ethical challenges, ensuring that its benefits are maximized while minimizing potential risks

References

  1. Aggarwal A, Kadian N, Tanwar A, Yadav A, Gupta KK. (2011). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in global sustainable development.J Appl Nat Sci. 3(2):340-51.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  2. Bücking H, Kafle A.(2015). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nitrogen uptake of plants: current knowledge and research gaps. Agron 5(4):587-612.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Dodd JC. (2000). The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agro-and natural ecosystems. Outlook Agric. 29(1):55-62.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Foo E, Ross JJ, Jones WT, Reid JB. (2013). Plant hormones in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: an emerging role for gibberellins. Ann Bot. 111(5):769-79.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Leake J, Johnson D, Donnelly D, Muckle G, Boddy L, Read D. (2004).  Networks of power and influence: the role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning.Canad J Bot.  82(8):1016-45.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Lee EH, Eo JK, Ka KH, Eom AH. (2013). Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their roles in ecosystems. 41(3):121-5.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Javaid A, Ashraf M. (2014).  The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments.Biotechnol Adv. 32(2):429-48.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Parniske M. (2008).  Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol. (10):763-75.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Simard SW, Durall DM. (2004).  Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance.Canad J Bot. 82(8):1140-65.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Smith SE, Smith FA. (2012). Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. 104(1):1-3.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App