Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Commentary - Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology (2023) Volume 5, Issue 4

Conundrum in Knee Surgery: Tourniquet Pain in Arthroplasty Patients.

Michel Tan*

Singapore General Hospital

*Corresponding Author:
Michel Tan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Singapore General Hospital,
Singapore
E-mail: Michel548@gmail.com

Received:26 Jul-2023, Manuscript No. AAAA-23-109601; Editor assigned:28-Jul-2023, PreQC No. AAAA-23-109601 (PQ); Reviewed:11-Aug-2023, QC No. AAAA-23-109601; Revised:16-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. AAAA-23-109601 (R); Published:23-Aug-2023, DOI:10.35841/ aaaa-5.4.160

Citation: Tan M. Conundrum in knee surgery: Tourniquet pain in arthroplasty patients.. J Anesthetic Anesthesiol. 2023;5(4):160

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology

Introduction

The realm of knee surgery is a symphony of precision and innovation, where medical mastery meets the pursuit of pain relief and improved quality of life. However, within this harmonious landscape, a dissonant note often arises – tourniquet pain during knee arthroplasty. As medical professionals navigate the complexities of surgical procedures, the challenge of managing tourniquet-related discomfort becomes a conundrum that warrants careful consideration and strategic solutions. Tourniquets have long played a crucial role in knee arthroplasty, contributing to improved visualization, reduced blood loss, and enhanced surgical efficiency. By temporarily restricting blood flow to the surgical site, tourniquets provide a bloodless field that enables surgeons to perform intricate procedures with greater accuracy. However, alongside these benefits comes the potential for tourniquet-induced pain – a challenge that requires thoughtful management[1].

Tourniquet pain is a complex phenomenon that arises from a combination of factors. The inflation of the tourniquet can compress nerves, leading to ischemia, nerve irritation, and the release of pain-inducing substances. Additionally, as the tourniquet deflates after the surgery, reperfusion can cause a rush of blood and pain-triggering substances into the previously restricted area. While tourniquets undeniably contribute to surgical success, managing the pain they can induce is a pivotal challenge. A multifaceted approach is necessary to strike a balance between surgical precision and patient comfort. Customizing tourniquet pressure based on individual patient factors, such as limb size and blood pressure, can help mitigate pain while maintaining surgical efficiency. Utilizing regional anesthesia, such as femoral nerve blocks, can reduce the reliance on tourniquets and help manage pain during surgery[2].

Carefully timing tourniquet inflation and deflation to minimize ischemia-reperfusion injuries can contribute to reducing tourniquet-related discomfort. Multimodal Pain Management: Employing a combination of pain management strategies, including local anesthetics, opioids, and non-opioid analgesics, can provide comprehensive relief. Educating patients about the possibility of tourniquet pain and discussing pain management strategies beforehand can alleviate anxiety and enhance their overall surgical experience. Monitoring patients postoperatively for signs of acute pain, neuropathy, or delayed recovery can guide intervention and ensure comprehensive pain management. In the delicate dance of knee arthroplasty, where precision meets healing, addressing tourniquet pain is a testament to patient-centered care. Striving for a seamless fusion of surgical success and patient comfort, medical professionals embrace the conundrum posed by tourniquet-induced discomfort with determination and innovation[3].

The journey through the conundrum entails not only surgical expertise but also compassionate communication, informed decision-making and collaborative efforts between surgical teams and patients. Ultimately, the goal is to harmonize the surgical symphony with strategies that alleviate tourniquet pain, offering patients not only the gift of restored mobility but also the reassurance of a more comfortable recovery[4].

In this pursuit, the conundrum becomes an opportunity – an opportunity to elevate the standards of care, enhance patient satisfaction, and weave a narrative of healing where both medical mastery and patient well-being take center stage[5].

References

  1. Dennis DA, Kittelson AJ, Yang CC, et al.. Does tourniquet use in TKA affect recovery of lower extremity strength and function? A randomized trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2016;474:69-77.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref

  2. Rajanish R, Harisankar M, Malayil JT, et al. Functional outcome of non-resurfacing patelloplasty in primary total knee arthroplasty-A one year follow up study of 62 knee replacements. Kerala J Orthop. 2019;32(2).

    3. Google Scholar

  3. Kulshrestha V, Kumar S, Datta B, et al. Ninety-day morbidity and mortality in risk-screened and optimized patients undergoing two-team fast-track simultaneous bilateral TKA compared with unilateral TKA—A prospective study. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):752-60.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Tak R, Gurava Reddy AV, Jhakotia K, et al. Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial. Musculoskelet. Surg. 2020 27:1-8.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Abdulkareem IH, Liu P, Adhikhari A, et al. Combined quadriceps tendon reconstruction and total knee replacement with computer navigation: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2022;16(1):1-9.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App