Microbiology: Current Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Microbiology: Current Research (2023) Volume 7, Issue 3

Computational approaches to hypothesize functions for human-associated microbial gene products

Dag Urich *

Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

*Corresponding Author:
Dag Urich
Department of Biology,
Lund University
Sweden
E-mail: urich.d@gmail.com

Received:22-May-2023, Manuscript No. AAMCR-23-99388;Editor assigned: 25-May-2023, PreQC No. AAMCR-23-99388(PQ);Reviewed:08-Jun-2023, QC No. AAMCR-23-99388;Revised:12-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. AAMCR-23-99388(R); Published:20-Jun-2023, DOI: 10.35841/ aamcr-7.3.152

Citation: Dag Urich.Computational approaches to hypothesize functions for human associated microbial gene products. J Micro Curr Res. 2023;7(3):152

Visit for more related articles at Microbiology: Current Research

Introduction

The human body is home to trillions of microorganisms, collectively known as the human microbiome. These microorganisms play a critical role in human health, influencing everything from digestion and nutrient absorption to immune system function and mental health. As a result, there has been significant interest in understanding the functions of the genes and gene products associated with these microbes. However, experimental methods for determining the function of microbial genes can be time-consuming and expensive. As a result, computational approaches have emerged as an important tool for hypothesizing functions for human-associated microbial gene products. [1].

One of the most commonly used computational approaches is sequence-based homology. This method involves comparing the amino acid or nucleotide sequence of a gene product to sequences of proteins with known functions. If there is a high degree of similarity between the two sequences, it is likely that the microbial gene product shares a similar function. For example, if a microbial gene product shares significant sequence similarity with a protein that is known to be involved in lipid metabolism, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the microbial gene product also plays a role in lipid metabolism. In some cases, sequence-based homology can provide a high level of confidence in the predicted function of a microbial gene product. [2].

Another computational approach that is commonly used is network-based analysis. This method involves constructing a network of interactions between proteins and using this network to infer the function of uncharacterized proteins. The logic behind this approach is that proteins that interact with each other are likely to be involved in similar biological processes. For example, if a microbial gene product is found to interact with a protein that is known to be involved in glucose metabolism, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the microbial gene product may also be involved in glucose metabolism. Network-based analysis can be particularly useful when there are large amounts of data available, as it allows researchers to integrate multiple types of data to make predictions about protein function. [3].

In addition to these two approaches, there are a number of other computational methods that can be used to hypothesize functions for microbial gene products. One such method is phylogenetic profiling, which involves identifying genes that are consistently found together in different organisms. If two genes are consistently found together in multiple organisms, it is likely that they are involved in the same biological process. Another method is gene ontology analysis, which involves assigning functional annotations to genes based on their similarity to genes with known functions. This approach is based on the idea that genes with similar functions will have similar annotations in functional databases. While these computational approaches can be highly effective at predicting the functions of microbial gene products, there are some limitations to these methods. One major limitation is that they rely on the availability of high-quality data. In particular, sequence-based homology requires accurate annotations of protein function, while network-based analysis requires large amounts of data on protein interactions. [4].

Another limitation is that these methods may not be able to predict the function of highly divergent proteins or proteins with novel functions. In some cases, it may be necessary to use experimental methods to validate computational predictions or to identify the function of uncharacterized proteins. Despite these limitations, computational approaches have played a critical role in advancing our understanding of the human microbiome. For example, one recent study used a combination of network-based analysis and sequence-based homology to predict the functions of uncharacterized proteins in the gut microbiome. In addition to their potential for advancing our understanding of the human microbiome, computational approaches have broader implications for the field of microbiology as a whole. As the availability of genomic data continues to grow, computational approaches will become increasingly important for predicting the functions of uncharacterized proteins across a wide range of microorganisms. Furthermore, these approaches have the potential to accelerate the pace of discovery in microbiology by providing researchers with a powerful tool for generating testable hypotheses about the functions of uncharacterized genes and gene products. [5].

Conclusion

Computational approaches are a powerful tool for hypothesizing functions for human-associated microbial gene products. These methods rely on the integration of multiple types of data, including sequence data, network data, and functional annotations, to predict the functions of uncharacterized proteins.

 

References

  1. Börnigen D, Tranchevent LC, Bonachela-Capdevila F, et al.An unbiased evaluation of gene prioritization tools. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3081-8.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Brestoff JR, Artis DCommensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system. Immunol. 2013;14(7):676-84.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes Cell. 2012;148(6):1293-307.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Huh D, Kim HJ, Fraser JP, et al. Microfabrication of human organs-on-chips. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2135-57.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Li J, Jia H, Cai X, et al.An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):834-41.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App