Research Article - Biomedical Research (2018) Volume 29, Issue 6
Clinical effect of combined controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan therapy on elderly patients suffering from type II diabetic nephropathy with hypertension
Xiao-Juan Wang1#, Jian-Rong Wu2#, Lin Liu3, Qiu Yang3, Hui-Lan Yu1, Wan-Hong Luo4 and Zong-Xun Yan3*
1Department of Nutrition, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, PR China
2Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, PR China
3Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, PR China
4Department of Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, PR China
#These authors contributed equally to this work
- *Corresponding Author:
- Zong-Xun Yan
Department of Endocrinology
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
PR China
Accepted date: December 13, 2017
DOI: 10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3620
Visit for more related articles at Biomedical ResearchAbstract
Objective: This study aims to discuss the clinical effect of the combined therapy of nifedipine controlledrelease tablets-valsartan on elderly patients who have Type II Diabetic Nephropathy (T2DN) with Hypertension (HTN).
Methods: We recruited 130 elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN and who were admitted to our hospital over the period of April, 2015 to February, 2017. We divided the patients into the control (n=65) and observation groups (n=65) through the odd-even method. The control group received controlledrelease nifedipine tablets and the observation group received controlled-release nifedipine tablets– valsartan. We compared the blood pressure level, total therapeutic efficiency, treatment satisfaction, and BUN level of the two groups.
Results: The blood pressure level of the observation group significantly improved relative to that of the control group (P<0.05). The total therapeutic efficiency of the control group was 80.00%, which was significantly lower than that of the observation group (98.46%) (P<0.05). The treatment satisfaction of the observation group was 96.92%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (75.38%) (P<0.05). The BUN level of the observation group was considerably higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Elderly patients who received controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan for the clinical treatment of T2DN with HTN exhibited significantly improved blood pressure level, total therapeutic efficiency, treatment satisfaction, and BUN levels. Therefore, the reasonable application of controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan therapy can improve the life quality of elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN.
Keywords
Elderly type II diabetes, Nephropathy, Hypertension, Nifedipine controlled-release tablets, Valsartan
Introduction
The elderly is vulnerable to Type II Diabetes (T2DH), a functional disorder that drastically decreases insulin secretion [1]. Clinical treatment often stimulates insulin secretion in patients to achieve a remarkable effect on T2DH. Diabetes (DH) often increases the probability of suffering from relevant diseases, particularly Hypertension (HTN) [2]. Delaying therapy places patients with DH at high risk of kidney failure, a life-threatening condition [3]. This study investigates the effect and clinical value of combined controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan for the treatment of elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN.
Information and Methods
General information
We recruited 130 elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN and who were admitted to our hospital over the period of April, 2015 to February, 2017. We divided the patients into the control (n=65) and observation groups (n=65) through the odd-even method. The control group comprised 26 males and 39 females aged 56-89 y old (mean: 54.29 ± 6.35). Disease course in this group ranged between 6 and 19 y (mean: 10.11 ± 0.53). The observation group comprised 23 males and 42 females aged 53-90 (54.33 ± 6.32 average). Disease course in this group ranged between 7 and 20 y (10.15 ± 0.49 average). No significant difference in terms of gender, age, and disease course was found in the two groups (P>0.05).
Methods
The two groups first received insulin injections after hospital admission and received specific dietary control. Later, the control group received controlled-release nifedipine tablets, whereas the observation group received controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan. The control group received 25 mg of controlled-release nifedipine tablets twice a day. The observation group received controlled-release nifedipine tablets at the same dosage and frequency as the control group in addition to 75 mg of valsartan twice a day. Each treatment course lasted 6 months. Finally, the therapeutic outcomes of the two groups were compared.
Evaluation standards
Therapeutic effect: Significantly effective [4,5]: the renal function indexes and disease symptoms of patients were significantly relieved after treatment. Effective: the renal function indexes and disease symptoms of patients were relieved after treatment. Ineffective: the renal function indexes and disease symptoms of patients after treatment remained basically the same as those before treatment.
Treatment satisfaction: Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using a self-made questionnaire, which classified the treatment as very satisfactory, satisfactory, and unsatisfactory. Final investigation results were compared.
Statistical analysis
All observation data concerning clinical drug effects on elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN were analysed using SPSS19.0. Measurement data (BUN level) were expressed in x̄ ± s and examined through t-test. Enumeration data were expressed in % and examined using χ2-test. P<0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.
Results
Blood pressure level
The blood pressure level of the observation group has significantly improved relative to that of the control group (P<0.05) (Table 1).
Groups | Time | n | Diastolic pressure | Systolic pressure |
---|---|---|---|---|
Observation | Before treatment | 65 | 103.59 ± 3.91 | 169.49 ± 6.25 |
After treatment | 65 | 84.69 ± 5.75 | 109.69 ± 5.73 | |
t | 21.9137 | 56.8600 | ||
P | <0.05 | <0.05 | ||
Control | Before treatment | 65 | 99.19 ± 4.49 | 165.15 ± 6.13 |
After treatment | 65 | 91.02 ± 4.83 | 111.79 ± 4.42 | |
t | 9.9882 | 56.9251 | ||
P | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Table 1: Comparison of blood pressure level between the control and observation group (͞x ± s, mmHg).
Total therapeutic efficiency
The total therapeutic efficiency of the control group is 80.00%, which is significantly lower than that of the observation group (98.46%) (P<0.05). Results are listed in Table 2.
Groups | n | Significantly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total therapeutic efficiency (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observation | 65 | 55 | 9 | 1 | 98.46 |
Control | 65 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 80.00 |
χ2 | 11.5271 | ||||
P | <0.05 |
Table 2: Comparison of the total therapeutic efficiency of the control and observation groups (cases).
Treatment satisfaction
The treatment satisfaction of the observation group is 96.92%, which is significantly higher than that of the control group (75.38%) (P<0.05). Results are shown in Table 3.
Groups | n | Very satisfactory | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | Total satisfaction (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observation | 65 | 56 | 7 | 2 | 96.92 |
Control | 65 | 39 | 10 | 16 | 75.38 |
χ2 | 12.6389 | ||||
P | <0.05 |
Table 3: Comparison of treatment satisfaction between the control and observation groups (cases).
BUN level
The BUN level of the observation group is considerably higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Results are shown in Table 4.
Groups | Time | n | UAER (g/L) | BUN (mmol/L) | Scr (μmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observation | Before treatment | 65 | 139.29 ± 25.13 | 6.13 ± 0.69 | 75.53 ± 0.79 |
After treatment | 65 | 101.39 ± 14.82 | 4.29 ± 0.79 | 59.29 ± 0.55 | |
t | 10.4735 | 14.1429 | 136.0180 | ||
P | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | ||
Control | Before treatment | 65 | 137.49 ± 24.13 | 5.82 ± 1.01 | 72.79 ± 0.53 |
After treatment | 65 | 109.01 ± 16.25 | 4.82 ± 0.51 | 67.29 ± 0.65 | |
t | 7.8927 | 7.1255 | 52.8710 | ||
P | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Table 4: Comparison of BUN level between the control and observation groups (͞x ± s).
Discussion
The elderly are highly vulnerable to T2DN with HTN. Moreover, elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN may experience the life-threatening condition of drastically elevated blood pressure levels [6]. Clinicians should prioritize the reduction of the blood protein level and blood pressure level of elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN before providing specific treatment [7]. Controlled-release nifedipine tablets relieve hypertension by ensuring smooth muscle relaxation and vasorelaxation through decreasing free Ca+ concentration in vessel walls [8]. Additionally, this drug exerts protective effects on the kidney. Valsartan can hinder angiotensin II receptors and effectively control vasoconstriction [9]. Clinical therapy with controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan can significantly improve blood glucose level, blood pressure level, repair kidney tubules, and dramatically improve the urinary albumin excretion of patients [10].
In this study, the blood pressure level of the observation group significantly improved relative to that of the control group (P<0.05). The total therapeutic efficiency of the control group is 80.00%, which is significantly lower than that of the observation group (98.46%) (P<0.05). The treatment satisfaction of the observation group is 96.92%, which is significantly higher than that of the control group (75.38%) (P<0.05). The BUN level of the observation group is considerably higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). These findings prove the considerable clinical value of controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan for the treatment of T2DN with HTN in elderly patients.
Conclusion
Elderly patients who received controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan for the clinical treatment of T2DN with HTN exhibited significantly improved blood pressure level, total therapeutic efficiency, treatment satisfaction, and BUN levels. Therefore, the reasonable application of controlled-release nifedipine tablets-valsartan therapy can improve the life quality of elderly patients who have T2DN with HTN.
References
- Lindblom R, Higgins G, Coughlan M, de Haan JB. Targeting mitochondria and reactive oxygen species-driven pathogenesis in diabetic nephropathy. Rev Diabet Stud 2015; 12: 134-156.
- Amr AEGE, Abdalla MM. Anticancer activities of some synthesized 2, 4, 6-trisubstituted pyridine candidates. Biomed Res India 2016; 27: 731-736.
- Aggarwal PK, Veron D, Thomas DB, Siegel D, Moeckel G, Kashgarian M, Tufro A. Semaphorin3a promotes advanced diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes 2015; 64: 1743-1759.
- Zhang J, Zhang Z, Yang B, Jing X, Zhong W, Tang H. Synergistic effect of melatonin and atorvastatin in type 1 diabetic and ischemic injury cardiomyopathic sprague dawley rats. Lat Am J Pharm 2016; 35: 1719-1724.
- Dounousi E, Duni A, Leivaditis K, Vaios V, Eleftheriadis T, Liakopoulos V. Improvements in the management of diabetic nephropathy. Rev Diabet Stud 2015; 12: 119-133.
- Suribabu R, Pindiprolu SSS, Tallurt SV, Chintamaneni P, Samidala N. Protective effects of hydroxytyrosol from diabetic peripheral neuropathy in rodents: implications of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Lat Am J Pharm 2017; 36: 373-379.
- Rodríguez-Iturbe B, Pons H, Quiroz Y, Johnson RJ. The Immunological basis of hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2014; 27: 1327-1337.
- Liu GM, Xu K, Li J, Luo YG. 7, 8-dithydroxycoumarins protect human neuroblastoma cells from Aβ-mediated neurotoxic damage via inhibiting JNK and p38MAPK pathways. Biomed Res India 2016; 27: 591-595.
- Agarwal R, Flynn J, Pogue V, Rahman M, Reisin E, Weir MR. Assessment and management of hypertension in patients on dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25: 1630-1646.
- Motaweih AK, Usova E, Hussain W, Dello Z, Petri T. Combination therapy with nifedipine GITS60mg: subanalysis of a prospective, 12 w observational study (AdADOSE). Clin Exp Hypertens 2016; 38: 71-80.