Commentary - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 6
Clinical Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy: Bridging Research and Practice
Joseph Kennedy *
Department of Oncology, University of California San Francisco, USA
- *Corresponding Author:
- Joseph Kennedy
> Department of Oncology, University of California San Francisco, USA
E-mail: josephk@hotmail.com
Received: 03-Dec -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-155290; Editor assigned: 04-Dec-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-155290 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Dec-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-155290; Revised:23-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-155290 (R); Published:28-Dec-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.6.238
Citation: Kennedy J. Clinical advances in cancer immunotherapy: Bridging research and practice. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(6):238
Introduction
Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the landscape of oncology, offering new hope to patients through innovative treatments that harness the power of the immune system. Recent clinical advances are bridging the gap between groundbreaking research and real-world practice, making immunotherapy an integral part of cancer care [1].
Efforts are underway to adapt CAR T-cell therapies for solid tumors by addressing challenges like the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and antigen heterogeneity [2].
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 have revolutionized treatment paradigms for various cancers. Initially approved for melanoma, ICIs now have indications for Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Renal cell carcinoma, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Triple-negative breast cancer [3].
Recent clinical trials are exploring their efficacy in less common cancers, such as endometrial and gastric cancers, broadening the scope of immunotherapy. Advances in biomarker discovery are improving patient selection and treatment outcomes. Key biomarkers include. High TMB correlates with better responses to ICIs. MSI-high tumors are particularly sensitive to PD-1 inhibitors [4].
A critical predictor for PD-1/PD-L1 therapy efficacy. Emerging biomarkers, such as LAG-3 and TIGIT expression, are under investigation to further refine precision medicine approaches. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown remarkable success in hematologic malignancies, including: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Multiple myeloma [5].
Combining immunotherapy with traditional modalities such as chemotherapy, radiation, or targeted therapies is showing promise in overcoming resistance and enhancing efficacy. For example Combines ICIs with cytotoxic agents to increase tumor immunogenicity [6].
Radiation can modulate the tumor microenvironment to improve immune activation. Oncolytic viruses are engineered to selectively infect and destroy cancer cells while stimulating an anti-tumor immune response. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is the first FDA-approved oncolytic virus therapy for melanoma, and new agents are being tested in combination with ICIs [7].
Despite its promise, cancer immunotherapy faces several practical challenges: Managing toxicities such as colitis, pneumonitis, and endocrinopathies requires multidisciplinary care. High costs and limited availability hinder widespread adoption [8].
Variability in patient responses highlights the need for better biomarkers and monitoring tools. Real-world studies complement clinical trials by providing insights into the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapies in diverse patient populations. These studies are critical for understanding: Long-term outcomes Treatment sequencing Impact of comorbidities on immunotherapy efficacy [9].
As cancer immunotherapy continues to evolve, future advancements include Leveraging neoantigens unique to individual tumors to stimulate immune responses. Targeting multiple immune pathways simultaneously. Using machine learning to predict responses and optimize treatment strategies [10].
Conclusion
The integration of cancer immunotherapy into clinical practice marks a paradigm shift in oncology. By bridging research and practice, clinicians and researchers are paving the way for more effective, personalized cancer treatments. Ongoing innovation and collaboration will continue to expand the boundaries of what is possible in cancer care.
References
- Saleh GM, Desai P, Collin JR, et al.Incidence of eyelid basal cell carcinoma in England: 2000–2010.Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(2):209–12.
- Madge SN, Khine AA, Thaller VT, et al. Globe-sparing surgery for medial canthal basal cell carcinoma with anterior orbital invasion. 2010;117(11):2222–228.
- Sun MT, Wu A, Huilgol SC, et al. Accuracy of biopsy in subtyping periocular basal cell carcinoma.Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31(6):449–451.
- Allali J, D’Hermies F, Renard G. Basal cell carcinomas of the eyelids. 2005;219(2):57–71.
- Pfeiffer MJ, Pfeiffer N, Valor C. Descriptive study on basal cell eyelid carcinoma.Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015;90(9):426–431.
- Nelson CC, Hertzberg BS, Klintworth GK. A histopathologic study of 716 unselected eyes in patients with cancer at the time of death.Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:788–793.
- Kivelä T. The epidemiological challenge of the most frequent eye cancer: retinoblastoma, an issue of birth and death. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1129–131.
- Hu DN, Yu GP, McCormick SA, et al. Population-based incidence of uveal melanoma in various races and ethnic groups.Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:612–17.
- Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A, Jöckel KH, Bornfeld N, et al. Positive interaction between light iris color and ultraviolet radiation in relation to the risk of uveal melanoma: A case-control study. 2009;116:340–348.
- Shields CL, Furuta M, Thangappan A, et al. Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033 consecutive eyes.Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:989–998.
Indexed at. Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at. Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref