Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Reach Us +44-7897-074717

Mini Review - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2024) Volume 8, Issue 2

Climate Change and Health Inequity: Understanding the Interplay of Environmental and Social Factors

Perry Gustaf *

Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 901 87, Sweden.

*Corresponding Author:
Perry Gustaf
Department of Epidemiology, Global Health, Umeå University, Sweden
E-mail: perygust@umu.se

Received: 29-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130258; Editor assigned: 01- Mar -2024, PreQC No. AAPHPP-24-130258 (PQ); Reviewed:15- Mar-2024, QC No. AAPHPP-24-130258; Revised:19- Mar -2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130258 (R); Published:25- Mar -2024, DOI:10.35841/ aaphpp-8.2.228

Citation: Gustaf P Addressing environmental racism: a critical lens on health disparities. J Public Health Policy Plan .2024;8(2):228

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

    

 

Introduction

Climate change poses significant threats to human health, exacerbating existing health inequities across the globe. While the impacts of climate change are widespread, vulnerable populations, including low-income communities, marginalized groups, and developing nations, bear the brunt of its consequences. Understanding the intricate interplay between environmental changes and social determinants is crucial for addressing the health disparities intensified by climate change [1].

.Rising global temperatures, extreme weather events, altered precipitation patterns, and sea-level rise are among the hallmarks of climate change. These environmental changes have direct and indirect impacts on human health. Heatwaves, for instance, are becoming more frequent and intense, leading to heat-related illnesses and deaths, particularly among the elderly and those with pre-existing health conditions [2].

Moreover, altered precipitation patterns contribute to floods and droughts, disrupting food and water supplies and increasing the risk of waterborne diseases and malnutrition. The spread of infectious diseases, such as malaria and dengue fever, is also facilitated by changes in temperature and rainfall patterns, disproportionately affecting communities with limited access to healthcare and resources.While climate change affects everyone, its impacts are not distributed equally. Social determinants of health, including income, education, race, gender, and access to healthcare, play a significant role in determining vulnerability and resilience to climate-related health risks [3].

health risks [2,3]. Low-income communities, often located in areas prone to environmental hazards, face multiple stressors, including inadequate housing, limited access to healthcare, and economic instability, which amplify the health impacts of climate change. Marginalized groups, such as indigenous populations and people of color, are disproportionately affected due to historical injustices, systemic discrimination, and unequal distribution of resources [4].

Furthermore, climate-induced displacement and migration exacerbate social vulnerabilities, as displaced populations often face challenges accessing healthcare, education, and employment opportunities in their new environments. This displacement also strains social cohesion and exacerbates mental health issues, particularly among vulnerable populations [5].

To address environmental racism and its impact on health disparities, a multifaceted approach is required. Firstly, policymakers must prioritize the voices and needs of affected communities in decision-making processes related to land-use planning, environmental regulations, and pollution control measures. Meaningful community engagement and participation are essential for ensuring that policies are equitable and address the specific concerns of marginalized populations [6].

Furthermore, climate-induced displacement and migration exacerbate social vulnerabilities, as displaced populations often face challenges accessing healthcare, education, and employment opportunities in their new environments. This displacement also strains social cohesion and exacerbates mental health issues, particularly among vulnerable populations [7].

Investing in environmental justice initiatives and equitable development strategies is also crucial for addressing the root causes of environmental racism. This includes promoting sustainable infrastructure, expanding access to green spaces, and investing in clean energy solutions that benefit all communities, particularly those most impacted by environmental injustices [8].

Additionally, efforts to combat climate change must integrate considerations of health equity into decision-making processes. This entails engaging with local communities, incorporating indigenous knowledge and practices, and promoting inclusive governance structures to ensure that marginalized voices are heard and their needs are met [9].

Education and awareness-raising campaigns are also critical for empowering communities to adapt to climate-related health risks and advocate for their rights. By fostering climate literacy and promoting sustainable practices, individuals can contribute to collective efforts to mitigate climate change and build resilient communities [10].

conclusion

 

Climate change is not just an environmental issue—it is a profound health equity challenge that exacerbates existing disparities and threatens human well-being across the globe. To address this challenge effectively, it is imperative to understand the complex interplay between environmental changes and social determinants of health. By prioritizing the needs of vulnerable populations, integrating health equity considerations into climate action, and fostering community resilience and empowerment, we can work towards a more just and sustainable future for all

 

References

  1. Mattingly C. The concept of therapeutic ‘emplotment’. Social science & medicine. 1994 ;38(6):811-22.

    2.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Draelos ZD. Therapeutic moisturizers. Dermatologic clinics. 2000;18(4):597-607.

    3.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Kralisch S, Klein J, Bluher M,et al. Therapeutic perspectives of adipocytokines. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2005;6(6):863-72.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Zheng CJ, Han LY, Yap CW,et al. Therapeutic targets: progress of their exploration and investigation of their characteristics. Pharmacological reviews. 2006;58(2):259-79.

    5.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Main TF. The hospital as a therapeutic institution. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic. 1946;10(3):66.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Caplan AI. Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. The Journal of Pathology: A Journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 2009;217(2):318-24.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Winum JY, Scozzafava A, Montero JL, et al. Sulfamates and their therapeutic potential. Medicinal research reviews. 2005;25(2):186-228.

    8.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Neki JS. Gur?-Chel? relationship: The possibility of a therapeutic paradigm. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1973;43(5):755.

    9.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. 9.Diwu Z. Novel therapeutic and diagnostic applications of hypocrellins and hypericins. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 1995;61(6):529-39.

     

                    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Mattingly C. The concept of therapeutic ‘emplotment’. Social science & medicine. 1994 ;38(6):811-22.

    11.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

     

Get the App