Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Rapid Communication - Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology (2023) Volume 7, Issue 5

Cesarean section and neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies

Davis Andrew *

Department of Health, University of Canberra and ACT Government Health Directorate, Bruce, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
Davis Andrew
Department of Health
University of Canberra and ACT Government Health Directorate
Bruce, Australia.
E-mail: andrew123@canberra.edu.au

Received: 26-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. AAGGS-23-112682; Editor assigned: 29-Aug-2023, PreQC No. AAGGS-23-112682 (PQ); Reviewed:15-Sep-2023, QC No. AAGGS-23-112682; Revised:18-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. AAGGS-23-112682 (R); Published: 25-Sep-2023, DOI:10.35841/2591-7994-7.5.167

Citation: Andrew D. Cesarean section and neonatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies. Gynecol Reprod Endocrinol. 2023;7(5):167

Visit for more related articles at Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology

Introduction

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) rate is rising worldwide, in parallel with the rising rates of cesarean delivery. Multiple therapeutic strategies and a timely diagnosis have led to a successful management in most cases, with many women preserving fertility after treatment. Despite this, still little is known regarding pregnancy outcomes after a CSP. The main adverse outcomes reported after CSP are recurrence of CSP, miscarriage, preterm birth, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and uterine rupture. In addition, little is known about the influence of the different treatments on subsequent pregnancy outcomes after a CSP. Being aware of the impact of the different management strategies on the fertility outcomes is highly relevant to counsel pregnant women after a CSP. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an up-to-date review of the reproductive outcomes of women with a history of CSP and of the influence of various treatments on subsequent pregnancy outcomes [1].

Pregnancy is a transformative and joyous journey, but for some women, it can also bring higher risks and complications that require special attention. In cases of high-risk pregnancies, where the health of the mother or baby (or both) is at increased jeopardy, the decision to perform a Cesarean section (C-section) becomes a critical consideration. This article explores the unique challenges, considerations, and benefits of Cesarean sections in high-risk pregnancies, shedding light on the medical complexities that healthcare providers and expectant mothers must navigate [2].

High-risk pregnancies can be the result of various factors, including maternal age, pre-existing medical conditions, complications during pregnancy, multiple pregnancies (e.g., twins or triplets), or fetal abnormalities. The health and well-being of both the mother and baby are closely monitored in these cases. High-risk pregnancies often come with specific medical indications that make a planned C-section a safer choice. These indications may include preeclampsia, placental issues, fetal distress, or a previous history of C-section. Some high-risk pregnancies involve abnormal fetal positioning, such as breech or transverse presentations, making vaginal delivery more challenging and risky [3].

Babies born in high-risk pregnancies may require immediate medical attention and neonatal intensive care, making it crucial to coordinate delivery with a capable neonatal team. Recovery after a C-section in a high-risk pregnancy may be more complex due to the added stressors on the mother's body. Pain management, wound care, and monitoring for complications are essential. High-risk pregnancies and C-sections can bring heightened emotional challenges. Support networks, counselling, and mental health considerations are vital for expectant mothers and their families. While Cesarean sections in high-risk pregnancies present unique challenges, they can also offer specific benefits are a planned C-section allows healthcare providers to control and prepare for potential complications, ensuring a safer delivery [4]. For mothers with underlying medical conditions, a planned C-section can reduce the physical and emotional stress associated with labor. Continuous fetal monitoring during a C-section allows for immediate response to any signs of fetal distress.

The increased rates of cesarean section are thought to be due mainly to changed risk profiles both for expectant mothers and for their yet unborn children, as well as an increase in cesarean section by maternal request. In 1991, 15.3% of all new-born babies in Germany were delivered by cesarean section; by 2012, the corresponding figure was 31.7%, despite the fact that a medical indication was present in less than 10% of all cases. This development may perhaps be explained by an increasing tendency toward risk avoidance, by risk-adapted obstetric practice, and increasing media attention. The intraoperative and postoperative risks of cesarean section must be considered, along with complications potentially affecting subsequent pregnancies [5].

Conclusion

Cesarean sections in high-risk pregnancies require careful assessment, planning, and coordination between healthcare providers and expectant mothers. While they may present challenges, these procedures can also be life-saving and protective of maternal and fetal health. Decisions regarding Cesarean sections in high-risk pregnancies should be made collaboratively, considering both the medical necessities and the individual needs and preferences of the expectant mother. This article serves as a resource to empower and inform those facing the complexities of high-risk pregnancies and Cesarean sections.

References

  1. Ronco A, Roero S, Arduino S, et al. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Worsen Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy. J Clini Med. 2023;12(9):3129.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Chaudhary V, Thiyagarajan K, Patil Y, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome of twin pregnancy at a tertiary care center. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(12):4545-9.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Evrenos AN, Cakir Gungor AN, Gulerman C, et al. Obstetric outcomes of patients with abortus imminens in the first trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289:499-504.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Suarez MB, Costa ML, Parpinelli MA, et al. Pregnancy in women undergoing hemodialysis: case series in a Southeast Brazilian reference center. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet.2015;37:05-9.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Salazar MR, Espeche WG, Leiva Sisnieguez CE, et al. Masked hypertension and neonatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies. J Hum Hypertens. 2023;37(1):36-41.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App