Opinion Article - Microbiology: Current Research (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4
Cellular microbial interactions: Mechanisms of host cell manipulation by bacteria.
Kofi Nyarko *
Department of Microbiology, University of Ghana, Ghana
- *Corresponding Author:
- Kofi Nyarko
Department of Microbiology, University of Ghana, Ghana
E-mail: kofi@ug.edu.gh
Received: 02-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAMCR-24-144312; Editor assigned: 05-Aug-2024, PreQC No AAMCR-24-144312 (PQ) Reviewed:19-Aug-2024, QC No. AAMCR-24-144312 Revised:23-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAMCR-24-144312 (R); Published:28-Aug-2024, DOI:10.35841/aamcr-8.4.223
Citation: Nyarko K. Cellular microbial interactions: Mechanisms of host cell manipulation by bacteria. J Micro Curr Res. 2024; 8(4):223
Introduction
Bacteria have evolved complex mechanisms to interact with host cells, manipulating cellular processes to facilitate their survival and proliferation. These interactions are crucial for understanding bacterial pathogenesis and developing therapeutic strategies. This article explores the diverse strategies bacteria employ to manipulate host cells [1].
The initial step in bacterial manipulation involves adhesion to host cells. Bacteria use adhesions, surface proteins that bind to specific host cell receptors. This interaction is often followed by invasion, where bacteria exploit hosts cellular machinery to enter cells. For example, Salmonella uses its Type III secretion system (T3SS) to inject effector proteins into host cells, triggering actin cytoskeleton rearrangement and bacterial internalization [2].
Once inside, bacteria can subvert host cell signalling pathways. Yersinia species, for instance, inject Yop proteins via T3SS, which interfere with host immune signalling. This subversion prevents the activation of immune responses, allowing bacteria to evade detection and establish infection [3].
Bacteria often target the host cell cytoskeleton to facilitate their movement and replication. Listeria monocytogenes expresses ActA, which hijacks the host's actin polymerization machinery, enabling bacterial motility within and between cells. This actin-based motility aids in the spread of infection while avoiding extracellular immune defences [4].
To survive intracellularly, bacteria must counteract host cell defenses. Mycobacterium tuberculosis resides within macrophages by inhibiting phagosome-lysosome fusion, avoiding degradation. Similarly, Legionella pneumophila creates a specialized vacuole, the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV), which avoids lysosomal fusion and provides a niche for bacterial replication [5].
Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a host defense mechanism against infection. Some bacteria manipulate apoptosis to benefit their survival. Chlamydia trachomatis, for example, produces anti-apoptotic factors that prevent host cell death, prolonging the intracellular environment suitable for bacterial replication [6].
Bacteria employ multiple strategies to evade the host immune system. Staphylococcus aureus secretes proteins that interfere with opsonization and phagocytosis. Additionally, Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, alters its surface antigens to avoid antibody-mediated detection, a process known as antigenic variation [7].
Pathogens need to acquire nutrients from the host to sustain their growth. Escherichia coli uses siderophores to sequester iron from the host, a critical nutrient often limited during infection. Helicobacter pylori alters host cell metabolism to increase the availability of nutrients necessary for its survival in the harsh environment of the stomach [8].
Some bacteria form biofilms on host tissues, providing a protective niche against immune responses and antibiotics. Biofilms are structured communities of bacteria embedded in a self-produced extracellular matrix. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a well-known biofilm producer, often leading to chronic infections in cystic fibrosis patients due to its biofilm-forming capability [9].
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) allows bacteria to acquire new genetic traits, including virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. Bacteria like Streptococcus pneumoniae can take up DNA from their environment through transformation, incorporating new genes that enhance their pathogenic potential and adaptability [10].
Conclusion
Understanding the mechanisms of host cell manipulation by bacteria is crucial for developing new therapeutic strategies. These interactions highlight the sophisticated strategies bacteria use to establish infections and evade host defenses. Continued research in this area will provide insights into bacterial pathogenesis and potential targets for antimicrobial interventions.
References
- Asrat S, de Jesús DA, Hempstead AD. Bacterial pathogen manipulation of host membrane trafficking. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:79-109.
- Le Fevre R, Evangelisti E, Rey T. Modulation of host cell biology by plant pathogenic microbes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:201-229.
- Ham H, Sreelatha A, Orth K. Manipulation of host membranes by bacterial effectors. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(9):635-646.
- Galán JE, Bliska JB. Cross-talk between bacterial pathogens and their host cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:221-255.
- Cornejo E, Schlaermann P, Mukherjee S. How to rewire the host cell: a home improvement guide for intracellular bacteria. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(12):3931-3948.
- Anderson DM, Frank DW. Five mechanisms of manipulation by bacterial effectors: a ubiquitous theme. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(8).
- Kim M, Ashida H, Ogawa M, Yoshikawa Y, Mimuro H. Bacterial interactions with the host epithelium. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8(2):145-154.
- Diacovich L, Gorvel JP. Bacterial manipulation of innate immunity to promote infection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(2):117-128.
- Killackey SA, Sorbara MT, Girardin SE. Cellular aspects of Shigella pathogenesis: focus on the manipulation of host cell processes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:38.
- Omotade TO, Roy CR. Manipulation of host cell organelles by intracellular pathogens. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7(5).
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref