Journal of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Opinion Article - Journal of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing (2024) Volume 7, Issue 2

Caring for Wisdom: The Essence of Geriatric Critical Care

Paula Jacob*

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Paula Jacob
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Cizik School of Nursing, USA
E-mail: paulajacob@med.co.in

Received: 01-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. AAICCN-24-134930; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2024, PreQC No. AAICCN-24-134930 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Apr-2024, QC No.
AAICCN-24-134930; Revised: 19-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. AAICCN-24-134930(R); Published: 26- Apr-2024, DOI:10.35841/aaiccn-7.2.199.

Citation: Jacob P. Caring for Wisdom: The Essence of Geriatric Critical Care. J Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024; 7(2):199

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing

Introduction

As our population ages, the demand for specialized healthcare services tailored to the unique needs of older adults continues to grow. Geriatric critical care emerges as a vital discipline within the healthcare landscape, providing intensive care to elderly patients facing acute illnesses, exacerbations of chronic conditions, and complex medical situations. In this article, we delve into the essence of geriatric critical care, exploring its challenges, nuances, and the compassionate approach required to meet the needs of this vulnerable population [1].

Geriatric critical care encompasses the management of critically ill older adults, typically those aged 65 and above, who require intensive medical intervention and monitoring. Unlike younger adults, older patients often present with multiple comorbidities, frailty, cognitive impairment, and diminished physiological reserve, making their care more complex and challenging [2, 3].

Older adults frequently have multiple chronic conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory disorders, which can complicate their presentation and treatment. Frail older adults are particularly vulnerable to adverse outcomes in critical illness due to their decreased physiological reserves, increased susceptibility to stressors, and heightened risk of functional decline. The use of multiple medications, including prescription drugs, over-the-counter remedies, and supplements, is common in the elderly population, leading to increased risk of drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, and medication errors [4, 5].

Conditions such as dementia and delirium are prevalent among older adults and can significantly impact their ability to participate in their care, communicate their needs, and understand medical instructions. Critical illness and prolonged hospitalization can exacerbate pre-existing functional impairments or precipitate new disabilities, affecting mobility, independence, and quality of life. Discussions surrounding goals of care, advance care planning, and end-of-life decision-making are essential components of geriatric critical care, given the increased likelihood of mortality and the importance of aligning medical interventions with patients' preferences and values [6, 7].

A thorough evaluation of the older patient's medical history, functional status, cognitive function, social support, and goals of care guides the development of individualized treatment plans. Geriatric critical care requires collaboration among a diverse team of healthcare professionals, including geriatricians, intensivists, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and social workers, to address the complex needs of older patients comprehensively. Treatment decisions should align with the patient's goals, preferences, and values, prioritizing comfort, quality of life, and preservation of functional independence whenever possible.

Strategies to prevent and manage delirium, such as early mobilization, orientation protocols, sleep promotion, and minimizing use of sedating medications, are integral to optimizing outcomes in geriatric critical care [8, 9].

Rationalizing medication regimens, avoiding potentially inappropriate medications, and monitoring for adverse drug reactions help minimize polypharmacy-related complications and improve medication safety. Early rehabilitation interventions, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy, aim to mitigate functional decline, promote mobility, and facilitate safe discharge to the community or rehabilitation facilities. Engaging family members and caregivers in care planning, decision-making, and education fosters collaboration, enhances communication, and provides emotional support to both patients and their loved ones[10].

Conclusion

Geriatric critical care represents a pivotal intersection of medical expertise, compassion, and advocacy for older adults facing acute illness or injury. By embracing the principles of comprehensive assessment, multidisciplinary collaboration, goal-concordant care, and rehabilitation, healthcare providers can optimize outcomes and uphold the dignity and autonomy of older patients throughout their critical care journey.

In the realm of geriatric critical care, every decision made, every intervention undertaken, and every interaction with patients and their families carries profound significance. By honoring the wisdom and resilience of older adults, we reaffirm our commitment to providing compassionate and dignified care to those who have contributed so much to our communities and society.

References

  1. Lancet T. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a unique medical emergency. Lancet. 2018 10; 391(10124):911.

    2. Indexed at , Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Education Science, Systems of Care Writing Groups. Part 1: executive summary: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. 202020; 142:S337-57.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Lodise TP, Patel N, Lomaestro BM, et al. Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration-time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 49(4):507-14.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. 2010; 122:S685-705.

    5. Indexed at , Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Alic B, Gurbeta L, Badnjevic A. Machine learning techniques for classification of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. 201711.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. McNally B, Robb R, Mehta M, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance—cardiac arrest registry to enhance survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005–December 31, 2010. 2011; 29: 60(8):1-9.

    7. Indexed at , Google Scholar

  7. Cangelosi PR.(2004). The tact of teaching RN-to-BSN students. J Prof Nurs, 20(3), 167–173.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Eyler J, Giles Jr DE. Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass, Inc., 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104; 1999.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Kumar K, King EA, Muzaale AD, et al. A smartphone app for increasing live organ donation. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16(12): 3548-3553.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Hodoshima N, Masuda S, Inui K. Decreased renal accumulation and toxicity of a new VCM formulation in rats with chronic renal failure. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. (2007) 22:419–427.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App