Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Commentary - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 5

Cancer vaccines: Stimulating immune responses against tumors.

David Montenegro *

Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA

*Corresponding Author:
David Montenegro
Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
E-mail: dmontengro@iu.edu

Received: 27-Sep -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-150267; Editor assigned: 28-Sep-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-150267 (PQ); Reviewed:14-Oct-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-150267; Revised:19-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-150267 (R); Published:28-Oct-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.5.226

Citation: Montenegro D., Cancer vaccines: Stimulating immune responses against tumors. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(5):227

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. Among these strategies, cancer vaccines have emerged as a promising approach to stimulate the immune system to recognize and attack tumor cells. By harnessing the body’s natural immune response, cancer vaccines aim to provide a targeted and long-lasting defense against various malignancies. This article explores the types of cancer vaccines, their mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and the challenges faced in their development and implementation [1].

These vaccines are designed to prevent cancer from developing in healthy individuals. The most notable example is the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which significantly reduces the risk of cervical cancer by targeting the viral proteins that promote tumorigenesis. Similarly, the hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine reduces the risk of liver cancer by preventing chronic infection [2].

Unlike preventative vaccines, therapeutic vaccines are intended to treat existing cancer by stimulating an immune response against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). These vaccines can be further categorized into several types: These vaccines utilize specific peptides derived from TAAs to elicit immune responses. For example, the peptide vaccine Melanoma Vaccine (GP100) has shown efficacy in treating melanoma. Dendritic cells (DCs) are powerful antigen-presenting cells that can be engineered to express TAAs. These DC vaccines are designed to enhance T cell activation and proliferation. Sipuleucel-T (Provenge) is an FDA-approved dendritic cell vaccine for prostate cancer [3].

These vaccines involve the delivery of genetic material encoding TAAs to induce an immune response. They can stimulate both humoral and cellular immunity, providing a robust defense against. These are engineered viruses that selectively infect and kill cancer cells while stimulating an immune response against the tumor. For instance, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is an oncolytic virus approved for melanoma [4].

Cancer vaccines aim to activate the immune system, particularly T cells, to recognize and destroy tumor cells. The mechanisms of action can be summarized as follows: Vaccines introduce tumor-associated antigens to the immune system, which are then processed and presented by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells. This presentation is critical for T cell activation [5].

Activated T cells proliferate and differentiate into effector cells capable of recognizing and killing tumor cells. The presence of costimulatory signals is essential for optimal T cell activation. A successful vaccination can lead to the development of memory T cells that persist long after vaccination, providing long-term protection against cancer recurrence [6].

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of cancer vaccines in treating various malignancies. Notable successes include: The HPV vaccine has been shown to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer significantly, demonstrating the power of preventive vaccination [7].

Clinical trials have shown that sipuleucel-T significantly improves overall survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer. This success highlights the potential of therapeutic vaccines in treating established tumors. Trials investigating peptide-based vaccines, such as gp100, have demonstrated enhanced survival rates in melanoma patients. T-VEC has shown promising results in clinical trials for melanoma, inducing durable responses and enhancing the immune system’s recognition of tumors [8].

Tumors are often heterogeneous, displaying a diverse array of antigens. This variability can complicate vaccine development, as a single vaccine may not be effective against all tumor cells. Cancer cells can develop mechanisms to evade immune detection, including downregulating antigen expression or altering immune signaling pathways [9].

Personalized cancer vaccines, which are tailored to an individual’s unique tumor profile, hold great promise. However, they require sophisticated technologies and bioinformatics approaches for antigen identification and selection. Designing robust clinical trials for cancer vaccines poses challenges, particularly in defining appropriate endpoints and patient populations [10].

Conclusion

Cancer vaccines represent a transformative approach to cancer treatment, offering the potential to stimulate the immune system to combat tumors effectively. With the success of both preventative and therapeutic vaccines, ongoing research and clinical trials are essential to overcome existing challenges and optimize vaccine efficacy. As the field of cancer immunotherapy continues to evolve, cancer vaccines may play a crucial role in providing long-term protection and improved outcomes for cancer patients.

References

  1. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nat. 1998;392(6673):245-52.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  3. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, et al., Melanoma staging: evidence?based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472-92.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  5. Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al., Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411-22.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  7. Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Sci. 2015;348(6230):69-74.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Sci. 2015;348(6230):56-61.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Maruggi G, Zhang C, Li J, et al.,. mRNA as a transformative technology for vaccine development to control infectious diseases. Mol Ther. 2019;27(4):757-72.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  13. Schlom J. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: current status and moving forward. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(8):599-613.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  15. Finn OJ. Cancer vaccines: between the idea and the reality. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(8):630-41.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  17. Klebanoff CA, Acquavella N, Yu Z, Restifo NP. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet?. Immunol 2011;239(1):27-44.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  19. Guo C, Manjili MH, Subjeck JR, Sarkar D, Fisher PB, Wang XY. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: past, present, and future. Adv Cancer Res. 2013;119:421-75.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar

Get the App