Perspective - Journal of Cancer Immunology & Therapy (2024) Volume 7, Issue 2
Breaking free from immune evasion: Checkpoint blockade's impact on cancer cells.
Kaiqing Zhe *
Department of Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China
- *Corresponding Author:
- Kaiqing Zhe
Department of Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China
E-mail: kaiqing.z@zzu.edu.cn
Received: 02-Apr -2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-132920; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2024, PreQC No. AAJCIT-24-132920 (PQ); Reviewed:17-Apr-2024, QC No. AAJCIT-24-132920; Revised:22-Apr-2024, Manuscript No. AAJCIT-24-132920(R); Published:29-Apr-2024, DOI:10.35841/aara-7.2.200
Citation: Zhe K., Breaking free from immune evasion: Checkpoint blockade's impact on cancer cells. J Cancer Immunol Ther. 2024;7(2):200
Introduction
In the realm of cancer therapeutics, the emergence of immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment paradigms. Among the various strategies, immune checkpoint blockade stands out for its remarkable ability to unleash the immune system against cancer cells. This article delves into the profound impact of checkpoint blockade on cancer cells, elucidating its mechanisms and therapeutic implications [1].
Despite its remarkable success, checkpoint blockade is not universally effective, with a significant proportion of patients exhibiting primary or acquired resistance. The clinical efficacy of checkpoint blockade has been profound, leading to durable responses and improved survival rates in a subset of patients [2].
PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade unleash different facets of the immune response. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors primarily act within the tumor microenvironment, restoring T cell function and promoting antitumor immunity [3].
Checkpoint blockade therapies work by disrupting the inhibitory signals that restrain immune cells from attacking cancer. Cancer cells often exploit immune checkpoints, inhibitory pathways that maintain self-tolerance and prevent autoimmunity, to evade immune surveillance [4].
Key players in this evasion include programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). By engaging with these checkpoints, cancer cells dampen immune responses, facilitating tumor progression and metastasis [5].
Monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 have demonstrated unprecedented success in various malignancies, including melanoma, lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. By blocking these checkpoints, these therapies reinvigorate exhausted T cells, enabling them to recognize and eliminate cancer cells effectively [6].
In contrast, CTLA-4 inhibitors modulate early T cell activation in lymphoid organs, augmenting priming and proliferation of cytotoxic T cells. Together, these mechanisms synergistically enhance the immune system's ability to combat cancer [7].
Notably, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) represent a unique challenge associated with checkpoint blockade, necessitating close monitoring and management strategies. However, the potential for long-term remission and even cure makes checkpoint blockade a cornerstone in modern cancer therapy [8].
Recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy have focused on combining checkpoint blockade with other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted therapies. These combination approaches aim to synergize with checkpoint blockade, overcoming resistance mechanisms and enhancing treatment outcomes. Additionally, biomarker-driven strategies help identify patients most likely to benefit from these combination regimens [9].
Understanding the underlying mechanisms of resistance and developing rational combination strategies are crucial areas of ongoing research. Furthermore, the identification of predictive biomarkers holds promise for optimizing patient selection and treatment response [10].
conclusion
Checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer therapy by unleashing the immune system's full potential against malignancies previously considered refractory to treatment. Through its ability to disrupt immune evasion mechanisms, checkpoint blockade offers hope for durable responses and improved survival in patients with advanced cancers. However, challenges such as resistance and irAEs underscore the need for continued research and innovation in this rapidly evolving field.
References
- Miao L, Zhang Y, Huang L. mRNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):1-23.
- Van Lint S, Renmans D, Broos K, et al., The ReNAissanCe of mRNA-based cancer therapy. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015;14(2):235-51.
- Heine A, Juranek S, Brossart P. Clinical and immunological effects of mRNA vaccines in malignant diseases. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):1-20.
- Barbier AJ, Jiang AY, Zhang P, et al., The clinical progress of mRNA vaccines and immunotherapies. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(6):840-54.
- Beck JD, Reidenbach D, Salomon N, et al., mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):1-24.
- Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, et al., mRNA vaccines—a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17(4):261-79.
- Jahanafrooz Z, Baradaran B, Mosafer J, et al., Comparison of DNA and mRNA vaccines against cancer. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(3):552-60.
- Fotin?Mleczek M, Zanzinger K, Heidenreich R, et al., Highly potent mRNA based cancer vaccines represent an attractive platform for combination therapies supporting an improved therapeutic effect. J Genet Med. 2012;14(6):428-39.
- Diken M, Kranz LM, Kreiter S, et al., mRNA: a versatile molecule for cancer vaccines. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2017;22(1):113-28.
- Rosa SS, Prazeres DM, Azevedo AM, et al., mRNA vaccines manufacturing: Challenges and bottlenecks. 2021;39(16):2190-200.
Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Goggle Scholar, Cross ref