Journal of Fisheries Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 151 808 1136

Opinion Article - Journal of Fisheries Research (2024) Volume 8, Issue 5

Assessment of Bycatch Reduction Devices in Commercial Trawling Operations

Rajesh Kapoor*

Department of Coastal Ecology, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.

*Corresponding Author:
Rajesh Kapoor
Department of Coastal Ecology
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
E-mail: rajesh.kapoor@coastaleco.iitk.ac.in

Received: 03-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. AAJFR-24-156286; Editor assigned: 04-Oct-2024, PreQC No. AAJFR-24-1562865(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Oct-2024, QC No AAJFR-24-1562865; Revised: 21-Oct-2024, Manuscript No. AAJFR-24-1562865(R); Published: 28-Oct-2024, DOI:10.35841/ aajfr -8.5.230

Citation: Kapoor R. Assessment of bycatch reduction devices in commercial trawling operations. J Fish Res. 2024;8(5):230.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Fisheries Research

Introduction

Bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) have become a critical focus in the management of commercial trawling operations worldwide, as they address ecological, economic, and ethical concerns associated with unintentional capture of non-target species [1]. The implementation of BRDs is driven by the need to maintain biodiversity, ensure sustainable fishing practices, and comply with international and regional regulatory frameworks. Assessing the effectiveness of these devices requires a comprehensive approach that considers design, deployment, and ecological impacts [2].

The evaluation of BRDs begins with examining their design and how well they align with the targeted species and fishing environment. BRDs are engineered to allow non-target species to escape while retaining the target catch. Common examples include grids, escape panels, and funnel-shaped devices integrated into trawl nets. The design must consider the behavioral and physiological traits of bycatch species, such as their swimming capabilities, response to light, and escape instincts. Studies often involve experimental trials in controlled environments or direct observations during fishing operations to measure escape rates and identify design improvements [3].

Deployment is another critical factor in assessing the effectiveness of BRDs. Factors such as the depth of operation, towing speed, and trawl configuration can influence their performance. Fisher behavior also plays a significant role; proper training and adherence to best practices are essential to maximize BRD efficiency. Seasonal and geographical variations in bycatch species composition further complicate assessments, necessitating localized and adaptive approaches [4].

The ecological benefits of BRDs are a primary metric of their success. Effective devices can significantly reduce the capture of juvenile fish, endangered species, and other non-target organisms, contributing to the preservation of marine ecosystems [5]. Quantitative studies often use data from onboard observers, video monitoring, and acoustic sensors to compare bycatch levels with and without BRDs. These analyses not only measure reductions in bycatch but also assess potential unintended consequences, such as changes in predator-prey dynamics or shifts in species distributions [6].

Economic considerations are also integral to the assessment of BRDs. While initial costs of development and implementation may be high, the long-term benefits include increased sustainability of target stocks and reduced waste, which can enhance profitability [7]. However, some fishers may experience short-term reductions in catch rates or increased operational complexity, which can lead to resistance against adopting these devices. Addressing these challenges through subsidies, training programs, and stakeholder engagement is crucial to ensure widespread acceptance [8].

Regulatory compliance plays a pivotal role in the adoption and assessment of BRDs. Many countries mandate the use of specific BRDs in commercial trawling operations to meet conservation goals and international commitments [9]. Assessments often include evaluating whether these devices meet legal standards and contribute to broader fisheries management objectives. Collaboration between scientists, policymakers, and industry stakeholders is essential to align regulatory requirements with practical considerations [10].

Conclusion

The development and assessment of BRDs are dynamic processes requiring continuous innovation and adaptation. Advances in materials science, behavioral ecology, and monitoring technologies are expanding the potential for more effective bycatch mitigation. On-going research and stakeholder involvement will be key to addressing the complex challenges associated with bycatch, ultimately contributing to the sustainability and resilience of marine ecosystems and fisheries worldwide.

References

  1. Cox TM, Lewison RL, Žydelis R, et al. Comparing effectiveness of experimental and implemented bycatch reduction measures: the ideal and the real. Biol Conserv. 2007;21(5):1155-64.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Kennelly SJ, Broadhurst MK. A review of bycatch reduction in demersal fish trawls. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2021;31(2):289-318.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Glass CW. Conservation of fish stocks through bycatch reduction: a review. Northeastern Naturalist. 2000 Dec;7(4):395-410.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Campbell LM, Cornwell ML. Human dimensions of bycatch reduction technology: current assumptions and directions for future research. Endanger Species Res. 2008;5(2-3):325-34.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Brewer D, Rawlinson N, Eayrs S, et al. An assessment of bycatch reduction devices in a tropical Australian prawn trawl fishery. Fish Res. 1998;36(2-3):195-215.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Piovano S, Basciano G, Swimmer Y, et al. Evaluation of a bycatch reduction technology by fishermen: a case study from Sicily. Mari Policy. 2012;36(1):272-7.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Hannah RW, Jones SA. Effectiveness of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) in the ocean shrimp (Pandalus jordani) trawl fishery. Fish Res. 2007;85(1-2):217-25.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Garci´a-Caudillo JM, Cisneros-Mata MA, Balmori-Rami´rez A. Performance of a bycatch reduction device in the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Biol Conserv. 2000;92(2):199-205.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Avery JD, Aagaard K, Burkhalter JC, et al. Seabird longline bycatch reduction devices increase target catch while reducing bycatch: a meta-analysis. J Nat Conserv. 2017;38:37-45.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Hannah RW, Lomeli MJ, Jones SA. Tests of artificial light for bycatch reduction in an ocean shrimp (Pandalus jordani) trawl: strong but opposite effects at the footrope and near the bycatch reduction device. Fish Res. 2015;170:60-7.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App