Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health (2023) Volume 7, Issue 4

Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement

Miguel Basir *

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics

*Corresponding Author:
Miguel Basir
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics
University of Madrid
Madrid, Spain
E-mail: miguel@basir.es

Received:25-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. AACDOH-23-105252; Editor assigned:29-Jun-2023, PreQC No. AACDOH-23-105252(PQ); Reviewed:12-Jul-2023, QC No. AACDOH-23-105252; Revised:17-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. AACDOH-23-105252(R); Published:24-Jul-2023, DOI:10.35841/ aacdoh-7.4.159

Citation: Basir M. Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement. J Clin Dentistry Oral Health. 2023; 7(4):159

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Oral Health

Abstract

  

Introduction

Man-made consciousness (simulated intelligence) applications are filling in dental embed methodology. The ongoing extension and execution of artificial intelligence models in embed dentistry applications have not yet been efficiently archived and broke down.The reason for this orderly survey was to evaluate the exhibition of man-made intelligence models in embed dentistry for embed type acknowledgment, embed achievement expectation by utilizing patient gamble variables and metaphysics measures, and embed plan streamlining joining limited component examination (FEA) computations and artificial intelligence models.Patients with a solitary missing tooth were enlisted for the independent mechanical embed a medical procedure. The patients went through a cone-shaft processed tomography (CBCT) check with a situating marker. Virtual preoperative embed situation and a penetrating arrangement were made before a medical procedure. The mechanical framework naturally played out the embed osteotomy and situation intraoperatively under the specialist's oversight. A postoperative CBCT check was performed to assess the deviations between the arranged and set inserts [1].

A manual pursuit was likewise directed. Peer-inspected investigations that created computer based intelligence models for embed type acknowledgment, embed achievement expectation, and embed plan improvement were incorporated. The inquiry system included articles distributed until February 21, 2021. Two examiners freely assessed the nature of the investigations by applying the Joanna Briggs Establishment (JBI) Basic Examination Agenda for Semi Trial Studies (nonrandomized exploratory investigations). A third examiner was counseled to determine absence of agreement. Advanced advancements have been perceived as leading edge developments in embed dentistry, giving exact, unsurprising, effective, and redid approaches for finding and treatment arranging, embed medical procedures, and prosthodontic therapies. Specifically, PC helped embed a medical procedure can accomplish and rearrange prosthetically driven embed situation to work on the exactness of implantation, keep away from intraoperative dangers, and permit negligibly obtrusive medical procedure. Exact embed arrangement is a fundamental essential for step-wise systems and effective clinical results [2].

PC helped medical procedures are presently most frequently applied for embed osteotomy and position, arranged into static PC helped embed a medical procedure (s-CAIS) and dynamic PC helped embed a medical procedure (d-CAIS). The s-CAIS innovation is the static aide approach for the total or fractional penetrating grouping utilizing a pre-manufactured careful layout The exactness of s-CAIS innovation exhibited complete mean blunders of 1.2 mm at the passage point, 1.4 mm at the apical point, and a rakish deviation of 3.5°, broke down by a meta-examination of 20 clinical preliminaries In this manner, a wellbeing edge of 2 mm ought to be kept up with while utilizing the s-CAIS In any case, the maximal deviations revealed by two clinical examinations were a long ways past the security edge, suggesting the potential dangers implied. Contrasted with the s-CAIS innovation, the d-CAIS frameworks utilize constant following for the drills utilizing an ideal marker, taking care of this data into the preoperative virtual arrangement by the cone-bar registered tomography (CBCT) Most clinical proof showed that the d-CAIS framework is marginally better than the s-CAIS innovation, while the unique framework shows critical heterogeneity, requiring alert, which not entirely set in stone by individual ability and experience Thusly, the improvement of PC helped embed a medical procedure is required [3].

4].

A populace or issue, mediation, correlation, result (PICO) question was figured out. The populace remembered the clinical applications for embed dentistry for embed type acknowledgment, osteointegration achievement or embed achievement expectation by utilizing patient gamble variables and cosmology rules, and embed plans advancement by joining FEA computations and artificial intelligence models. The mediation included man-made reasoning models. The still up in the air as nonapplicable. The result was the artificial intelligence model execution for acknowledgment of the embed type, gauge of the embed accomplishment by utilizing patient gamble elements and cosmology measures, and streamlining of embed plans by consolidating FEA estimations and simulated intelligence models [5].

References

  1. Park WJ, Park JB. History and application of artificial neural networks in dentistry.. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(04):594-601.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar,Cross Ref

  2. El-Hassoun O, Maruscakova L, Valaskova Z, et al. Artificial intelligence in service of medicine.. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy. 2019;120(3):218-22.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, et al. Quality of dental implants Int Dent J. 2003;53(S6P2):409-43.

    4. Indexed at, Sahiwal IG, Woody RD, Benson BW, et al. Radiographic identification of nonthreaded endoseous dental implants.. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(5):552-62.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Michelinakis G, Sharrock A, Barclay CW. Identification of dental implants through the use of Implant Recognition Software (IRS).. Int Den J. 2006;56(4):203-8.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App