Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Perspective - Archives of Industrial Biotechnology (2024) Volume 8, Issue 4

Applications of mass spectrometry in proteomic research

Walther Kayser*

Department of Genetic Identification, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

*Corresponding Author:
Walther Kayser
Department of Genetic Identification
University Medical Center Rotterdam
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
E-mail:w.kayser@erasmusmc.nl

Received: 25-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-144206; Editor assigned: 27-Jul-2024, PreQC No. AAAIB-24-144206 (PQ); Reviewed: 08-Aug-2024, QC No. AAAIB-24-144206; Revised: 20-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. AAAIB-24-144206 (R); Published: 26-Aug-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaaib- 8.4.222

Citation: Kayser W. Applications of mass spectrometry in proteomic research. Arch Ind Biot. 2024; 8(4):222

Visit for more related articles at Archives of Industrial Biotechnology

Mass spectrometry (MS) has become a cornerstone in proteomic research, offering unparalleled capabilities in the identification, quantification, and characterization of proteins. The evolution of MS technology has enabled scientists to delve deeper into the complexities of proteomes, paving the way for significant advancements across various fields, including biology, medicine, and environmental science. One of the primary applications of mass spectrometry in proteomics is the identification of proteins in complex biological samples. MS-based proteomics typically involves the enzymatic digestion of proteins into peptides, which are then analyzed by the mass spectrometer. The resulting peptide mass fingerprints are matched against protein databases to identify the corresponding proteins. Techniques such as tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) provide additional peptide sequence information, enhancing the accuracy of protein identification. This approach is invaluable for cataloging proteins in various organisms, tissues, and cells, contributing to comprehensive proteome databases [1], [2]

Quantitative proteomics aims to measure the abundance of proteins within a sample accurately. Mass spectrometry offers several strategies for protein quantification, including label-free quantification, stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). These techniques enable the comparison of protein expression levels across different conditions, such as healthy versus diseased states, or before and after treatment. Quantitative MS has been instrumental in identifying biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring therapeutic responses [3].

Proteins often undergo post-translational modifications (PTMs) that regulate their function, localization, and interactions. Mass spectrometry excels in detecting and characterizing PTMs, including phosphorylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, and acetylation. Advanced MS techniques, such as electron transfer dissociation (ETD) and higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD), provide detailed information about the modification sites and their dynamics. Understanding PTMs is crucial for elucidating cellular signaling pathways and identifying targets for drug development [4], [5]

Mass spectrometry is a powerful tool for studying protein-protein interactions, which are fundamental to many biological processes. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) combined with MS can identify interaction partners of a target protein, revealing interaction networks and signaling pathways. Cross-linking MS (XL-MS) further allows the mapping of interaction interfaces by covalently linking interacting proteins before MS analysis. These techniques provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying cellular functions and disease pathogenesis. The dynamic nature of the proteome, characterized by rapid changes in protein expression, modification, and turnover, can be studied using mass spectrometry. Techniques such as dynamic SILAC (dSILAC) and pulsed SILAC (pSILAC) enable the monitoring of proteome changes over time, providing a temporal dimension to proteomic studies. This information is vital for understanding processes such as cell cycle regulation, differentiation, and stress responses [6], [7]

Mass spectrometry has significant applications in clinical proteomics, where it is used to identify and quantify proteins in bodily fluids, tissues, and cells. MS-based proteomics has led to the discovery of novel biomarkers for various diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative disorders. These biomarkers can improve disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. Furthermore, MS is employed in the characterization of therapeutic proteins and the detection of protein-based contaminants in pharmaceutical products, ensuring drug safety and efficacy. Environmental proteomics utilizes mass spectrometry to study the protein composition of environmental samples, such as soil, water, and microbial communities. This field aims to understand how organisms respond to environmental stressors, such as pollutants, temperature changes, and nutrient availability. MS-based proteomics can identify biomarkers of environmental exposure and assess the impact of human activities on ecosystems. This knowledge is essential for developing strategies for environmental protection and sustainability [8], [9]

Mass spectrometry has revolutionized proteomic research, providing comprehensive insights into the protein universe. Its applications in protein identification, quantification, post-translational modification analysis, protein-protein interaction studies, proteome dynamics, clinical proteomics, and environmental proteomics have significantly advanced our understanding of biology and disease. As MS technology continues to evolve, it promises to unlock new dimensions of proteomic research, driving innovations in science and medicine [10].

References

  1. Meissner F, Geddes-McAlister J, Mann M, et al. The emerging role of mass spectrometry-based proteomics in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(9):637-54.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Halstenbach T, Topitsch A, Schilling O, et al. Mass spectrometry?based proteomic applications in dental implants research. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2024;18(3):2300019.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Cui M, Cheng C, Zhang L. High-throughput proteomics: a methodological mini-review. Lab Invest. 2022;102(11):1170-81.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Mann M, Kumar C, Zeng WF, et al. Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery. Cell Syst. 2021;12(8):759-70.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Duong VA, Lee H. Bottom-up proteomics: advancements in sample preparation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(6):5350.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Bennett HM, Stephenson W, Rose CM, et al. Single-cell proteomics enabled by next-generation sequencing or mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2023;20(3):363-74.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Mund A, Brunner AD, Mann M. Unbiased spatial proteomics with single-cell resolution in tissues. Mol Cell. 2022;82(12):2335-49.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Shuken SR. An introduction to mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2023;22(7):2151-71.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Sobsey CA, Ibrahim S, Richard VR, et al. Targeted and untargeted proteomics approaches in biomarker development. Proteomics. 2020;20(9):1900029.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Challen B, Cramer R. Advances in ionisation techniques for mass spectrometry?based omics research. Proteomics. 2022;22(15-16):2100394.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App