Opinion Article - Journal of Psychology and Cognition (2024) Volume 9, Issue 1
Altruism and egoism: the motivations behind helping behaviors
Xuehu Henn *
School of Public Administration and Human Geography, Hunan University of Technology and Business, China
- *Corresponding Author:
- Xuehu Henn
Xuehu Henn* School of Public Administration and Human Geography, Hunan University of Technology and Business, China
E-mail: xehuhnn@163.com
Received: 26-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. AAJPC-24-136123; Editor assigned: 28- Dec -2023, PreQC No. AAJPC-24-136123 (PQ); Reviewed:11 -Jan-2024, QC No. AAJPC-24-136123; Revised:17- Jan -2024, Manuscript No. AAJPC-24-136123 (R); Published:22- Jan -2024, DOI:10.35841/ aajpc-9.1.219
Citation: Henn X. The neuroscience of social connection: how relationships shape the brain. J Psychol Cognition .2024;9(1):219
Introduction
In the complex web of human interactions, the motivations behind acts of kindness and assistance can be traced back to two fundamental concepts: altruism and egoism. These contrasting yet intertwined motivations underpin much of our social behavior and have been subjects of fascination for psychologists, philosophers, and social scientists alike [1].
Altruism is the selfless concern for the well-being of others, often expressed through acts of kindness or generosity without expecting anything in return. This concept suggests that individuals may genuinely care about the welfare of others and are motivated to help purely out of compassion or empathy [2].
On the other hand, egoism revolves around self-interest and personal gain. Egoistic motivations suggest that individuals may engage in helping behaviors to achieve personal satisfaction, gain social approval, or even alleviate feelings of guilt or distress. Egoism does not necessarily imply malicious intent; rather, it reflects a natural inclination to prioritize one's own needs and desires [3].
Evolutionary theories propose that both altruistic and egoistic behaviors have adaptive significance. Altruism, despite seemingly selfless, can confer indirect benefits by promoting cooperation and strengthening social bonds within groups. This view aligns with the concept of inclusive fitness, where individuals may help others who share genetic relatedness to enhance the survival of shared genes [4].
Conversely, egoistic behaviors may also serve evolutionary purposes by ensuring individual survival and reproductive success. From this perspective, acts of kindness might be viewed as strategic investments aimed at securing future resources or social support.Psychological research suggests that altruism and egoism are not always mutually exclusive; they can coexist and even overlap within the same individual. Factors such as empathy, moral values, and situational cues play crucial roles in shaping whether one acts out of genuine concern for others or for personal gain [5].
In labor markets, social norms can affect employment patterns and wage expectations. Gender norms, for instance, can perpetuate disparities in occupational segregation and pay levels. Cultural expectations regarding work ethic and entrepreneurship can influence labor force participation and attitudes towards risk-taking.The influence of social norms intersects with the institutional context within which economic decisions are made. Laws, regulations, and formal institutions often coexist with informal norms, shaping economic outcomes. Norms can either reinforce or challenge existing economic structures, impacting policy effectiveness and institutional evolution [6].
Empathy, in particular, is a powerful motivator for altruistic behavior. When individuals experience emotional resonance with someone in distress, they are more likely to engage in helping behaviors driven by genuine compassion. However, altruism can also be influenced by social norms and expectations, where individuals may help others to conform to societal standards or avoid social sanctions [7].
.Cultural and environmental factors significantly influence the prevalence of altruism and egoism within a society. Cultural norms and values shape individuals' perceptions of helping behaviors and define what constitutes moral conduct. For instance, collectivist cultures often prioritize communal well-being over individual interests, fostering a greater propensity for altruistic acts [8].
Moreover, situational factors such as proximity, familiarity, and perceived deservingness of the recipient can impact the likelihood of altruistic or egoistic responses. Research has shown that people are more inclined to help those they perceive as similar to themselves or those who they believe deserve assistance.Understanding the motivations behind helping behaviors has important implications for social policy and community interventions [9].
Encouraging altruism through education, promoting empathy, and highlighting the benefits of cooperative behaviors can foster a more compassionate society.Furthermore, acknowledging the complex interplay between altruism and egoism can inform strategies for addressing social issues such as poverty, inequality, and discrimination. By recognizing that individuals may have diverse motivations for helping others, interventions can be tailored to appeal to both altruistic and egoistic inclinations [10].
conclusion
The impact of psychological distress on physical health is profound and multifaceted. Chronic stress, anxiety, or depression can contribute to the development of various physical health problems ranging from cardiovascular diseases to digestive disorders. Recognizing this interconnectedness emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological well-being to promote overall health and longevity. By implementing effective stress management strategies and seeking appropriate support, individuals can mitigate the detrimental effects of psychological distress on their physical health, leading to a healthier and more fulfilling life
References
- Diop S, Turmes L, Specht, C, et al. Capacities for meta-cognition, social cognition, and alexithymia in postpartum depression. Psychiatry Res. 2022;309:114430.
- Jia X, Li W, Cao L. The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2404.
- Zhornitsky S, Tourjman V, Pelletier J, et al. Acute effects of ketamine and esketamine on cognition in healthy subjects: A meta-analysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022:110575.
- Diop S, Turmes L, Specht C, et al. Capacities for meta-cognition, social cognition, and alexithymia in postpartum depression. Psychiatry Res. 2022;309:114430.
- Meng X, Fang S, Zhang S, et al. Multidomain lifestyle interventions for cognition and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022:104236.
- Fetherman DL, McGrane TG, Cebrick-Grossman J. Health Promotion for Small Workplaces: A Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership. Workplace Health Saf. 2021;69(1):7-14.
- Barmania S, Reiss MJ. Health promotion perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic: The importance of religion. Glob Health Promot. 2021;28(1):15-22.
- Lee M, Lee H, Kim Y, et al. Mobile app-based health promotion programs: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2838.
- Mwaura J, Carter V, Kubheka BZ. Social media health promotion in South Africa: Opportunities and challenges. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):1-7.
- Stark AL, Geukes C, Dockweiler C. Digital Health Promotion and Prevention in Settings: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e21063.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref