Short Communication - International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology (2024) Volume 12, Issue 5
Advances in Remote Sensing for Monitoring Wildlife Habitats and Populations
Bicik Ivana *
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Distillery Fields, University College Cork, Ireland
- *Corresponding Author:
- Bicik Ivana
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Distillery Fields, University College Cork, Ireland
E-mail: bicik@umail.ucc.ie
Received: 02-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. IJPAZ-24-146566 ; Editor assigned: 03- Sep-2024, PreQC No. IJPAZ-24-146566 (PQ); Reviewed:19- Sep-2024,QC No. IJPAZ-24-146566 ; Revised:24- Sep-2024, Manuscript No. IJPAZ-24-146566 (R); Published: 30- Sep-2024, DOI:10.35841/2420-9585-12.5.257
Abstract
Introduction
In recent decades, remote sensing technology has revolutionized the way scientists and conservationists monitor and manage wildlife habitats and populations. By leveraging a variety of remote sensing tools—from satellites to drones—researchers can now gain unprecedented insights into the dynamics of ecosystems and the status of wildlife species. These technological advances are crucial for addressing the pressing challenges of habitat loss, climate change, and biodiversity conservation. This article explores the latest advancements in remote sensing and their impact on wildlife monitoring and habitat management.
The Evolution of Remote Sensing Technology
Remote sensing involves the acquisition of information about an object or area from a distance, typically using satellites, aircraft, or drones. Advances in remote sensing technology have significantly enhanced our ability to observe and analyze wildlife habitats and populations with greater precision and efficiency [1].
Understanding Keystone Species
The concept of keystone species was introduced by the ecologist Robert Paine in the 1960s. Keystone species are those whose impact on their ecosystem is disproportionately large relative to their biomass or abundance. Their presence and activities have a critical influence on the structure, composition, and functioning of their ecosystems. The removal or decline of a keystone species can lead to significant changes in ecosystem dynamics, often resulting in reduced biodiversity and altered ecosystem processes [2, 3].
Satellite Imagery
Satellite imagery has been a cornerstone of remote sensing for decades. Recent advancements include:
High-Resolution Satellites: New satellites, such as those from the Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 missions, provide high-resolution imagery with improved spatial and temporal coverage. These satellites offer detailed views of land cover changes, vegetation health, and habitat fragmentation, which are essential for tracking wildlife habitats.
Hyperspectral Imaging: Hyperspectral sensors capture a broad spectrum of light, allowing for detailed analysis of vegetation types and health. This technology helps in identifying habitat changes and assessing the impact of environmental stressors on wildlife habitats.
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR): SAR technology can penetrate cloud cover and operate in various weather conditions, providing valuable data on forest structure, soil moisture, and changes in land cover. SAR is particularly useful for monitoring wetlands and tropical rainforests, where cloud cover often hampers optical imaging.
Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles)
Drones have become a game-changer in wildlife monitoring due to their flexibility and affordability. Recent advancements include:
Increased Flight Time and Range: Modern drones offer longer flight times and extended range, allowing for comprehensive surveys of large areas. This capability is crucial for monitoring expansive habitats and tracking animal movements
High-Resolution Cameras: Drones equipped with high-resolution cameras can capture detailed images and videos of wildlife and their habitats. This data is valuable for assessing animal populations, behavior, and habitat conditions.
Thermal Imaging: Drones equipped with thermal cameras can detect heat signatures, making them effective for locating and monitoring nocturnal or camouflaged species. Thermal imaging is also useful for assessing animal health and tracking individuals in dense vegetation [2, 3].
Geospatial Data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
GIS technology integrates spatial data from various sources, including remote sensing imagery, to analyze and visualize habitat changes and wildlife distributions. Recent advancements in GIS include:
Real-Time Data Integration: Modern GIS platforms can integrate real-time data from satellites, drones, and ground sensors, providing up-to-date information on wildlife movements and habitat conditions
Advanced Modeling and Analysis: GIS tools allow researchers to model habitat suitability, predict species distributions, and analyze the impacts of environmental changes. These capabilities are essential for conservation planning and management.
Crowdsourced Data: GIS platforms increasingly incorporate crowdsourced data from citizen scientists and mobile apps. This data enhances monitoring efforts by providing additional observations and validating remote sensing information [4, 5].
Applications in Wildlife Monitoring and Habitat Management
The advancements in remote sensing technology have wide-ranging applications in wildlife monitoring and habitat management:
Habitat Mapping and Analysis
Remote sensing enables the detailed mapping and analysis of wildlife habitats, including land cover changes, habitat fragmentation, and vegetation health. This information helps identify critical habitats, assess habitat quality, and prioritize conservation efforts. For example, satellite imagery has been used to track deforestation in the Amazon rainforest and its impact on endangered species.
Population Estimation and Behavior Study
Drones and high-resolution satellite imagery facilitate the estimation of wildlife populations and the study of animal behavior. By capturing images of animal groups or individuals, researchers can estimate population sizes, monitor breeding patterns, and observe behaviors without disturbing the animals. For instance, drones have been used to monitor the populations of African elephants and assess their movements in relation to human activities.
Monitoring Environmental Changes
Remote sensing technology provides valuable insights into environmental changes that affect wildlife habitats. By tracking changes in land cover, vegetation health, and climate variables, researchers can assess the impact of these changes on wildlife populations. This information is crucial for understanding the effects of climate change, habitat degradation, and natural disasters on wildlife [6, 7].
Conservation and Management Planning
Remote sensing data supports the development of conservation strategies and management plans. By providing detailed information on habitat conditions and wildlife distributions, remote sensing helps identify conservation priorities, design protected areas, and implement habitat restoration projects. For example, remote sensing has been used to plan the expansion of protected areas and to monitor the effectiveness of conservation measures [8, 9].
Future Directions
The future of remote sensing in wildlife monitoring and habitat management holds exciting possibilities: .
Integration with Artificial Intelligence (AI)
AI and machine learning algorithms can analyze vast amounts of remote sensing data to identify patterns, detect species, and predict environmental changes. Integrating AI with remote sensing technologies will enhance data analysis capabilities and improve decision-making processes.
Miniaturization and Cost Reduction
Continued advancements in miniaturization and cost reduction will make remote sensing technologies more accessible and affordable. This will enable broader adoption of drones, satellite imagery, and other remote sensing tools for wildlife monitoring and conservation. .
Enhanced Collaboration and Data Sharing.
Improved collaboration and data sharing among researchers, conservation organizations, and government agencies will enhance the effectiveness of remote sensing efforts. Open access to remote sensing data and collaborative platforms will facilitate better coordination and more impactful conservation initiatives [10].
Conclusion
Advances in remote sensing technology have transformed the way we monitor wildlife habitats and populations, providing valuable insights into ecosystem dynamics and conservation needs. By leveraging high-resolution satellite imagery, drones, GIS, and other remote sensing tools, researchers and conservationists can better understand and manage the complex interactions within ecosystems. As technology continues to evolve, remote sensing will play an increasingly vital role in safeguarding wildlife and ensuring the health and resilience of our planet's diverse ecosystems.
References
- Ketata, I., Denier, X., Hamza-Chaffai, A., and Minier, C. 2008. Endocrine-related reproductive effects in molluscs. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol., 147: 261-270.
- Rittschof, D., and McClellan-Green, P., 2005. Molluscs as multidisciplinary models in environment toxicology. Pollut. Bull., 50: 369-373.
- Fodor, I., Urbán, P., Scott, A.P., and Pirger, Z., 2020. A critical evaluation of some of the recent so-called ‘evidence’for the involvement of vertebrate-type sex steroids in the reproduction of mollusks. Cell. Endocrinol., 516: 110949.
- Lopez-Vera, E., Aguilar, M.B., and de la Cotera, E.P.H., 2008. FMRFamide and related peptides in the phylum mollusca. Peptides., 29: 310-317.
- Khotimchenko, Y.S., and Deridovich, I.I., 1991. Monoaminergic and cholinergic mechanisms of reproduction control in marine bivalve molluscs and echinoderms: A review. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol., 100: 311-317.
- Soderhall, K., and Cerenius, L., 1998. Role of the prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrate immunity. Opin. Immunol., 10: 23-28.
- Jiravanichpaisal, P., Lee, B.L., and Soderhall, K., 2006. Cell-mediated immunity in arthropods: hematopoiesis, coagulation, melanization and opsonization. Immunobiology., 211: 213-236.
- Golding, D.W., 1974. A survey of neuroendocrine phenomena in non?arthropod invertebrates. Rev., 49: 161-224.
- Uscian, J.M., and Stanley-Samuelson, D.W., 1994. Fatty acid compositions of phospholipids and triacylglycerols from selected terrestrial arthropods. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol., 107: 371-379.
- Seemann, S., Zohles, F., and Lupp, A., 2017. Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation. J Biomed Sci., 24: 1-17.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref