Perspective - Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology (2024) Volume 8, Issue 1
Advances in diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases
Jaebum Lee *
Department of Chemistry, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
- *Corresponding Author:
- Jaebum Lee
Department of Chemistry, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
E-mail: jblee6@cau.ac.kr
Received: 29-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. AAJIDMM-24-142956; Editor assigned: 01- Jan-2024, PreQC No. AAJIDMM-24-142956 (PQ); Reviewed:16-Jan-2024, QC No. AAJIDMM-24-142956; Revised: 19- Jan-2024, Manuscript No. AAJIDMM-24-142956; Published: 25- Jan-2024, DOI:10.35841/ aajidmm-8.1.189
Citation: : Lee Jaebum. Advances in diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases. J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2024;8(1):189.
Introduction
The diagnosis of infectious diseases has witnessed significant advances over recent decades, largely driven by technological innovations and a deeper understanding of pathogen biology. These advancements have transformed the landscape of infectious disease diagnostics, making them more rapid, accurate, and accessible. This article explores the latest progress in diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases, highlighting key developments in molecular diagnostics, immunoassays, point-of-care testing, and next-generation sequencing [1, 2].
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a cornerstone of molecular diagnostics. It amplifies small amounts of DNA or RNA to detectable levels, allowing for the identification of pathogens with high specificity and sensitivity. Advances in PCR technology, such as real-time PCR (qPCR), have enabled quantitative detection of pathogens, providing valuable information on the viral load, which is crucial for monitoring the progress of infections like HIV and Hepatitis C [3, 4].
Isothermal amplification methods, such as Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA), have emerged as powerful alternatives to PCR. These techniques operate at a constant temperature, eliminating the need for thermal cycling and making them suitable for resource-limited settings. LAMP, in particular, has shown great promise in the rapid and cost-effective diagnosis of diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, and COVID-19 [5, 6].
The CRISPR-Cas system, originally discovered as a bacterial immune mechanism, has been adapted for diagnostic purposes. CRISPR-based diagnostics, like the SHERLOCK (Specific High Sensitivity Enzymatic Reporter UnLOCKing) and DETECTR (DNA Endonuclease-Targeted CRISPR Trans Reporter) systems, leverage the precision of CRISPR technology to detect specific genetic sequences of pathogens. These methods offer rapid, highly sensitive, and specific detection and have been effectively employed for identifying SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19 [7, 8].
ELISA remains one of the most widely used immunoassay techniques. It detects and quantifies antigens or antibodies in a sample, providing crucial information about the presence of pathogens or the immune response to an infection. Recent advances in ELISA technology have focused on enhancing sensitivity and reducing turnaround times. For instance, Chemiluminescent Immunoassays (CLIA) and Electrochemiluminescent Immunoassays (ECLIA) offer higher sensitivity and faster results compared to traditional colorimetric ELISA [9, 10].
Conclusion
The advances in diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases have significantly enhanced our ability to detect, monitor, and manage infections. Molecular diagnostics, including PCR, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR-based methods, offer rapid and precise identification of pathogens. Immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests provide quick and accessible diagnostic solutions, while point-of-care testing, powered by microfluidics and biosensors, brings diagnostics closer to patients.
References
- Brownstein JS, Rader B, Astley CM, et al. Advances in artificial intelligence for infectious-disease surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(17):1597-607.
- Wong F, de la Fuente-Nunez C, Collins JJ. Leveraging artificial intelligence in the fight against infectious diseases. Science. 2023;381(6654):164-70.
- Miller JM, Binnicker MJ, Campbell S, et al. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2018 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(6):e1-94.
- Riley LW, Blanton RE. Advances in molecular epidemiology of infectious diseases: definitions, approaches, and scope of the field. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(6):10-128.
- Kostyusheva A, Brezgin S, Babin Y, et al. CRISPR-Cas systems for diagnosing infectious diseases. Methods. 2022;203:431-46.
- Paul R, Ostermann E, Wei Q. Advances in point-of-care nucleic acid extraction technologies for rapid diagnosis of human and plant diseases. Biosens Bioelectron 2020;169:112592.
- O’Grady NP, Alexander E, Alhazzani W, et al. Society of critical care medicine and the infectious diseases society of America guidelines for evaluating new fever in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2023;51(11):1570-86.
- Wenzler E, Maximos M, Asempa TE, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: An updated primer for clinicians in the era of antimicrobial resistance: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2023;43(4):264-78.
- Liu Q, Jin X, Cheng J, et al. Advances in the application of molecular diagnostic techniques for the detection of infectious disease pathogens. Mol Med Rep. 2023;27(5):1-4.
- Zhong Y, Xu F, Wu J, et al. Application of next generation sequencing in laboratory medicine. Ann Lab Med. 2021;41(1):25.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref