Current Trends in Cardiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Current Trends in Cardiology (2024) Volume 8, Issue 7

Advances in cardiac pacing and defibrillation: techniques, technologies, and trends

Paul Friedman *

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA.

*Corresponding Author:
Arthur Feldman
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases br /> Veterans Affairs Medical Center
USA
E-mail: friman.aul@mayo.edu

Received:26-Jun-2024,Manuscript No. AACC-24-139890; Editor assigned:01-Jul-2024,PreQC No. AACC-24-139890(PQ); Reviewed:15-Jul-2024,QC No. AACC-24-139890; Revised:22-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. AACC-24-139890(R); Published:29-Jul-2024,DOI:10.35841/aacc-8.7.298

Citation:Paul Friedman. Advances in cardiac pacing and defibrillation: Techniques, technologies, and trends. 2024;8(7):298

Visit for more related articles at Current Trends in Cardiology

Abstract

   

Introduction

Cardiac arrhythmias are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The development and refinement of cardiac pacing and defibrillation technologies have been crucial in managing these conditions. Pacing devices, including pacemakers and defibrillators, have evolved from rudimentary tools to sophisticated systems capable of delivering tailored therapies. This article examines the latest advancements in pacing and defibrillation, focusing on technological innovations, clinical applications, and future prospects.One of the most significant advancements in cardiac pacing is the development of leadless pacemakers. Traditional pacemakers require leads to connect the device to the heart, posing risks such as infection, lead dislodgement, and lead fractures. Leadless pacemakers, like the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System, are small, self-contained devices implanted directly into the heart via catheterization. These devices eliminate the need for leads, reducing complications and improving patient outcomes. [1,2].

Biventricular pacing, a form of CRT, has transformed the management of heart failure patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. By synchronizing the contractions of the left and right ventricles, CRT improves cardiac efficiency and reduces symptoms. Recent advancements include quadripolar lead technology, allowing more precise programming and reducing the risk of phrenic nerve stimulation and lead dislodgement.Closed-loop stimulation is an innovative pacing technology that adjusts the pacing rate based on the autonomic nervous system's feedback. By continuously monitoring the heart's physiological responses, closed-loop systems can provide more natural and responsive pacing, improving patient comfort and exercise capacity. [3,4].

Subcutaneous ICDs represent a significant advancement in defibrillation technology. Unlike traditional transvenous ICDs, S-ICDs are implanted under the skin without leads placed in the heart or vasculature. This reduces the risk of bloodstream infections and lead-related complications. S-ICDs are particularly beneficial for younger patients and those with limited venous access.Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators, such as the Lifevest, provide temporary protection for patients at high risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) who are not immediate candidates for an implantable device. WCDs continuously monitor the heart rhythm and deliver a shock if a life-threatening arrhythmia is detected. These devices bridge the gap for patients awaiting transplantation or recovery from myocardial infarction. Recent defibrillators and pacemakers incorporate multi-point sensing technology, enabling more accurate detection of arrhythmias. By monitoring electrical activity from multiple locations within the heart, these devices can differentiate between malignant and benign arrhythmias more effectively, reducing inappropriate shocks and improving patient safety. [5,6].

Remote monitoring systems allow clinicians to track patients' device performance and cardiac status from a distance. These systems use wireless communication to transmit data to healthcare providers, enabling early detection of device malfunctions or arrhythmic events. Remote monitoring improves patient outcomes by facilitating timely interventions and reducing the need for frequent in-person follow-ups. Despite significant advancements, several challenges remain in the field of cardiac pacing and defibrillation. Device longevity is a primary concern, as battery life limits the lifespan of pacemakers and defibrillators. Researchers are exploring energy harvesting technologies and alternative power sources to extend device longevity. [7,8].

Another challenge is the prevention of device-related infections. Innovations in antimicrobial coatings and the development of fully bioabsorbable devices are being investigated to mitigate this risk. Additionally, improving patient-specific therapy through the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning holds promise for more precise and adaptive treatment strategies. [9,10].

Conclusion

The field of cardiac pacing and defibrillation has made remarkable strides, offering new hope for patients with arrhythmias. Leadless pacemakers, subcutaneous ICDs, and advanced sensing technologies are just a few examples of how innovation is driving improvements in patient care. However, continued research and development are essential to address existing challenges and further enhance the efficacy, safety, and patient experience of these life-saving devices. As technology advances, the future of cardiac pacing and defibrillation looks promising, with the potential to significantly reduce the burden of cardiac arrhythmias worldwide.

References

  1. Groeneveld PW, Dixit S. Cardiac pacing and defibrillation devices: cost and effectiveness. Annual review of medicine. 2017 Jan 14;68:1-3.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Ellenbogen KA. Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy E-Book. Health Sciences; 2011 Sep 8.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Survey of cardiac pacing and defibrillation in the United States in 1993. The American journal of cardiology. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):187-96.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Singh HR. Cardiac pacing and defibrillation in children and young adults. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal. 2013 Jan 1;13(1):4-13.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Bracke F. Complications and lead extraction in cardiac pacing and defibrillation. Netherlands Heart Journal. 2008 Jan;16:27-30.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Chubb H. Pacing and defibrillators in complex congenital heart disease. Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review. 2016 May;5(1):57.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Ideker RE. Correlation among fibrillation, defibrillation, and cardiac pacing. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1995 Mar;18(3):512-25.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Ellison K. Advances in cardiac pacing and defibrillation. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2017 Jun 3;15(6):429-40.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Lüderitz B. The impact of antitachycardia pacing with defibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1991 Feb;14(2):312-6.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Reiter MJ. Effects of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation on pacing threshold in the anesthetized dog. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1989 Jan 1;13(1):180-4.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

     

     

Get the App