Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Reach Us +44-7897-074717

Mini Review - Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning (2024) Volume 8, Issue 2

Addressing environmental racism: a critical lens on health disparities

Yahir Branche *

Department of Urology, University of California - San Diego, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Yahir Branche
Department of Urology, University of California - San Diego, USA
E-mail: yahirbrche@health.ucsd.edu

Received: 29-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130257; Editor assigned: 01- Mar -2024, PreQC No. AAPHPP-24-130257 (PQ); Reviewed:15- Mar-2024, QC No. AAPHPP-24-130257; Revised:19- Mar -2024, Manuscript No. AAPHPP-24-130255 (R); Published:25- Mar -2024, DOI:10.35841/aara- aaphpp-8.2.227

Citation: Branche Y Addressing environmental racism: a critical lens on health disparities. J Public Health Policy Plan .2024;8(2):227

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Public Health Policy and Planning

Abstract

   

 

Introduction

Environmental racism is a pervasive issue that has profound implications for public health, particularly among marginalized communities. This form of injustice manifests when vulnerable populations, often communities of color and low-income neighborhoods, bear the brunt of environmental hazards and pollution. The detrimental effects of environmental racism extend far beyond the physical environment, exacerbating existing health disparities and perpetuating systemic injustices. To address this pressing issue, it is imperative to adopt a critical lens that acknowledges the intersectionality of race, class, and environmental health, and implement policies and initiatives that prioritize equity and justice [1].

.One of the most glaring manifestations of environmental racism is the disproportionate siting of hazardous waste facilities, industrial plants, and polluting industries in marginalized communities. These communities, lacking political power and economic resources, are often targeted as convenient dumping grounds for toxic waste and pollutants. As a result, residents are exposed to higher levels of air and water pollution, leading to a myriad of health problems ranging from respiratory illnesses to cancer [2].

For instance, in the United States, studies have consistently shown that predominantly Black, Latinx, and Indigenous communities are more likely to live in close proximity to hazardous waste sites and industrial facilities compared to white communities. This phenomenon is not coincidental but rather a consequence of systemic racism and discriminatory land-use policies that have historically marginalized communities of color [3].

The health impacts of environmental racism are profound and far-reaching. Exposure to pollution and environmental toxins has been linked to increased rates of asthma, cardiovascular diseases, developmental disorders, and certain types of cancer. Children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions are particularly vulnerable, facing heightened risks of adverse health outcomes due to environmental exposures [4].

Furthermore, the environmental injustices perpetuated by environmental racism exacerbate existing health disparities. Marginalized communities already face barriers to accessing quality healthcare, nutritious food, and safe housing. When coupled with environmental hazards, these disparities are amplified, creating a vicious cycle of poverty, ill health, and environmental degradation [5].

To address environmental racism and its impact on health disparities, a multifaceted approach is required. Firstly, policymakers must prioritize the voices and needs of affected communities in decision-making processes related to land-use planning, environmental regulations, and pollution control measures. Meaningful community engagement and participation are essential for ensuring that policies are equitable and address the specific concerns of marginalized populations [6].

Additionally, there is a need for greater enforcement of environmental regulations and accountability for polluting industries. Companies must be held responsible for their environmental impact and compelled to adopt cleaner technologies and practices to minimize pollution and mitigate harm to surrounding communities [7].

Investing in environmental justice initiatives and equitable development strategies is also crucial for addressing the root causes of environmental racism. This includes promoting sustainable infrastructure, expanding access to green spaces, and investing in clean energy solutions that benefit all communities, particularly those most impacted by environmental injustices [8].

Education and awareness-raising efforts are equally important in combating environmental racism. By raising awareness about the link between environmental degradation, race, and health disparities, we can empower communities to advocate for their rights and mobilize for environmental justice [9].

Furthermore, fostering collaboration between public health practitioners, environmental advocates, and community organizations is essential for implementing holistic solutions that address the interconnected nature of environmental and social determinants of health [10].

conclusion

 

In conclusion, addressing environmental racism requires a comprehensive and intersectional approach that acknowledges the complex interplay between race, class, and environmental health. By centering equity and justice in policy-making processes, enforcing environmental regulations, investing in community-led solutions, and raising awareness about the detrimental effects of environmental racism, we can work towards building healthier and more equitable communities for all. It is imperative that we confront environmental racism with urgency and determination, recognizing that the fight for environmental justice is inseparable from the fight for racial and social justice

 

References

  1. Mattingly C. The concept of therapeutic ‘emplotment’. Social science & medicine. 1994 ;38(6):811-22.

    2.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Draelos ZD. Therapeutic moisturizers. Dermatologic clinics. 2000;18(4):597-607.

    3.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Kralisch S, Klein J, Bluher M,et al. Therapeutic perspectives of adipocytokines. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2005;6(6):863-72.

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Zheng CJ, Han LY, Yap CW,et al. Therapeutic targets: progress of their exploration and investigation of their characteristics. Pharmacological reviews. 2006;58(2):259-79.

    5.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Main TF. The hospital as a therapeutic institution. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic. 1946;10(3):66.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Caplan AI. Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. The Journal of Pathology: A Journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 2009;217(2):318-24.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Winum JY, Scozzafava A, Montero JL, et al. Sulfamates and their therapeutic potential. Medicinal research reviews. 2005;25(2):186-228.

    8.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Neki JS. Gur?-Chel? relationship: The possibility of a therapeutic paradigm. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1973;43(5):755.

    9.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. 9.Diwu Z. Novel therapeutic and diagnostic applications of hypocrellins and hypericins. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 1995;61(6):529-39.

     

                    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Mattingly C. The concept of therapeutic ‘emplotment’. Social science & medicine. 1994 ;38(6):811-22.

    11.                 Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

     

Get the App