Short Communication - Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology (2022) Volume 6, Issue 1
A brief note on the use of ologen collagen matrix implants to treat ocular hypotony developing after trabeculectomy
Heloisa Russ, Heloisa A Maestrini, Laura F Coelho, Marcos Balbino*, Regina C S Seixas
Department of Medicine, Centro Universitario Sao Camilo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Corresponding Author:
- Dr. Marcos Balbino
Department of Medicine
Centro Universitario Sao Camilo
Sao Paulo
Brazil
E-mail: marcosbalbino@mac.com
Received: 08-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. AACOVS-22-53908; Editor assigned: 10-Feb-2022, PreQC No. P-53649; Reviewed: 23-Feb-2022, QC No.Q-53649; Revised: 28-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. R-53649; Published: 07-Mar-2022, Doi: 10.35841/aacovs.6.1.519-520
Citation: Russ H, Maestrini HA, Coelho LF, et al. A brief note on the use of ologen collagen matrix implants to treat ocular hypotony developing after trabeculectomy. J Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;6(1):519-520.
Abstract
Ocular hypotony is an adverse and potentially sight-threatening complication that may occur after trabeculectomy. It is usually associated with over filtration or bleb leakage and has a wide variety of treatments, including non-surgical procedures such as pressure patching, application of bandage contact lenses, autologous blood injection, and intracameral viscoelastic injection. More invasive treatments include placement of transconjunctival compression sutures, excisions of the ischemic conjunctiva, scleral flap suturing, and scleral patch grafting. More recently the use of collagen matrix implants has been suggested in these cases due to their potential of inhibiting conjunctival scarring and contraction and promoting the formation of an organized collagen network that resembles normal conjunctiva.
Keywords
Ocular hypotony, Glaucoma, Trabeculectomy, Ologen collagen matrix.
About the Study
Ocular hypotony is a potentially vision-threatening complication that can occur after trabeculectomy. It can be associated with hyperfiltration or bleb leakage and has a wide variety of treatments, including non-surgical procedures, pressure patching, application of contact lenses, autologous blood injection and intracameral viscoelastic injection, in order to prevent exaggerated flow of aqueous humor [1,2]. More invasive treatments include placement of transconjunctival compression sutures, ischemic conjunctival excisions, scleral flap suturing, and scleral patch grafting [3]. The use of collagen matrix implants has been suggested in these cases because of their potential to inhibit conjunctival healing and contraction and promote the formation of an organized collagen network that resembles the normal conjunctiva [4,5].
Ologen® is a flexible biodegradable collagen matrix of animal origin whose porous matrix structure (0-300 μm) is obtained by cross-linked lyophilized type I atelocollagen (>90%) and glycosaminoglycans (<10%). It has been successfully used in ocular surgeries, especially pterygium, glaucoma drainage implants, and trabeculectomy and its potential effect is due to the prevention of fibrosis and subconjunctival scarring, reduction of conjunctival contraction, and promotion of the development of a near-normal subconjunctival stroma [6-11].
Efficacy
A few studies have compared Ologen® versus Mitomycin in terms of efficacy. Cillino, et al. evaluated 40 eyes assigned to trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C or Ologen® and by the end of 60 months, both materials presented a similar reduction in IOP and no intergroup difference in use of antiglaucoma medications [12]. Similar results were found by He et al. in a systematic review and meta-analysis that included 227 eyes and both materials had no statistical significance in IOP, glaucoma medication or adverse events. More recently, Song et al.published a meta-analysis including 11 studies and 443 participants and even though no differences were observed regarding reduction in glaucoma medications, success rate or complications, Trabeculectomy (TRAB) with MMC was associated with higher IOP-lowering efficacy and a higher incidence of postsurgery hypotony in contrast to that of TRAB with Ologen® [13].
Regarding the treatment of hypotony, Ologen® was also significantly effective at increasing IOP and VA in a recent case series. Similarly, one retrospective observational case series showed a significant increase in IOP from 3.8 ± 2.7 mmHg) to 9.0 ± 3.2 mmHg after twelve months [14,15].
Safety
The most frequent complications regarding the use of Ologen is comparable to the complications found in trabeculectomies and include hyphema, hypotony maculopathy, hypotony, bleb leakage, encapsulated bleb, shallow anterior chamber, choroidal detachment, blebitis and anterior chamber reaction [16]. However, Senthil et al. found that compared to mitomycin, Ologen showed a slight increase in transient hyphema rates, which could be to the loose scleral suture allowing ooze from the cut ends of the sclera into the anterior chamber [17]. Infrequently, distressing conditions may occur, especially kissing choroidal effusions requiring urgent surgical drainage [18]. As shown recently in a prospective randomized clinical trial, there were no differences in terms of complication rates in trabs with mitomycin or Ologen [19].
A history of hypersensitivity to porcine collagen is a contraindication and, as with antimetabolites, no safety studies were conducted in children and pregnant women. A possible advantage over the use of antimetabolites is the fact that the filtration blebs obtained are flat, with no increased risk of hypotonia, infection or bleb leak. If there are signs of allergy or presence of hypotony maculopathy, it can be removed. It also seems to reduce the need for needling or antimetabolite injections in the postoperative period [9,12].
Technique
Some techniques have been described, but the standard involves creating a posterior conjunctival incision distant from the bleb, near the posterior fornix, followed by careful dissection of the scleral-conjunctival adhesion with a 27-gauge needle or a crescent knife followed by the placement of Ologen Collagen Matrix [14].
Conclusion
There are various techniques to treat late-onset hypotony developing after trabeculectomy, from conservative to invasive options. The use of Ologen has shown to be an effective and safe option, although more comparative studies are required to support it as a first-line treatment for hypotony.
References
- Azuara-Blanco A, Katz LJ. Dysfunctional filtering blebs. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998; 43:93-126.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Xia T, Khouri AS. Intracameral viscoelastic treatment for hypotony after glaucoma incisional surgery. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019; 9:292-4.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Costa VP, Arcieri ES. Hypotony maculopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85:586-97.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Hsu WC, Spilker MH, Yannas IV, et al. Inhibition of conjunctival scarring and contraction by a porous collagen- glycosaminoglycan implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:2404-11.
- Chen HS-L, Ritch R, Krupin T, et al. Control of filtering bleb structure through tissue bioengineering: An animal model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(12): 5310–5314.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Chen X, Yuan F. Ologen implantation versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for treatment of pterygium. J Ophthalmol. 2018; 2018:1617520.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Jacobson A, Rojas C, Bohnsack BL. Ologen augmentation of Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucomas. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21:72.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Sastre-Ibáñez M, Cabarga C, Canut MI, et al. Efficacy of ologen matrix implant in Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:3178.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- He M, Wang W, Zhang X, et al. Ologen implant versus mitomycin C for trabeculectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e85782.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Shalaby HS, Hashem NH. Trabeculectomy with OloGen versus Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Silicone Oil-Induced Glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2021.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Hsu WC, Spilker MH, Yannas IV, et al. Inhibition of conjunctival scarring and contraction by a porous collagen- glycosaminoglycan implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:2404-11.
- Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, et al. Biodegradable collagen matrix implant versus mitomycin-C in trabeculectomy: five-year follow-up. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016; 16:24.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Song DS, Qian J, Chen ZJ. Ologen implant versus mitomycin-C for trabeculectomy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98:e16094.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Russ H, Maestrini HA, Coelho LF, et al. The use of Ologen Collagen Matrix implants to treat ocular hypotony developing after trabeculectomy: A case series. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021; 11206721211023314.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Tanito M, Okada A, Mori Y, et al. Subconjunctival implantation of ologen collagen matrix to treat ocular hypotony after filtration glaucoma surgery. Eye (Lond). 2017;31:1475-79.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Song DS, Qian J, Chen ZJ. Ologen implant versus mitomycin-C for trabeculectomy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 ;98:e16094.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Senthil S, Rao HL, Babu JG, et al. Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. Ologen implant in primary glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61:338.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Kornmann HL, Fellman RL, Smith OU, et al. Outcomes of bleb revision with ologen following filtering glaucoma surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021; 11206721211053503.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]
- Sen M, Midha N, Sidhu T, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin c combined with ologen implant versus mitomycin c alone as adjuvants in trabeculectomy. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1:88-98.
[Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]