Perspective - Archives of General Internal Medicine (2023) Volume 7, Issue 6

A brief note on health disparities in chronic disease management.

Robertson Turner ^*

Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Canada

*Corresponding Author:

Robertson Turner
Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Canada
E-mail: robertson.turner@ucalgary.ca

Received: 25-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. AAAGIM-23-122764; Editor assigned: 27-Nov-2023, PreQC No. AAAGIM-23-122764(PQ); Reviewed: 11-Dec-2023, QC No. AAAGIM-23-122764; Revised: 16-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. AAAGIM-23-122764 (R); Published: 23-Dec-2023, DOI:10.35841/aaagim -7.6.206

Citation: : Turner R. A brief note on health disparities in chronic disease management. Arch Gen Intern Med. 2023;7(6):206

Introduction

Health disparities in chronic disease management represent a significant and pervasive challenge in healthcare systems worldwide. Despite advances in medical science and technology, certain populations continue to experience unequal access to healthcare resources and suboptimal outcomes in managing chronic conditions. This article explores the root causes of health disparities in chronic disease management and discusses potential strategies to bridge these gaps.Health disparities refer to differences in health outcomes and healthcare access among various population groups. Chronic diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and hypertension, disproportionately affect certain communities, contributing to substantial disparities in disease prevalence, progression, and management [1,2].

The impact of social determinants, including socioeconomic status, education, and living conditions, is profound in chronic disease management. Individuals with limited access to resources often face barriers to preventive care, early diagnosis, and adherence to treatment plans. Racial and ethnic minorities often bear a disproportionate burden of chronic diseases. Factors such as cultural differences, discrimination, and limited healthcare access contribute to disparities in disease management outcomes. Rural communities frequently experience challenges in accessing healthcare services, leading to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal management of chronic conditions. Limited availability of healthcare facilities and healthcare professionals exacerbates these disparities [3,4].

Disparities in health literacy significantly impact an individual's ability to understand and manage chronic conditions. Limited health literacy is associated with lower rates of preventive care, poor medication adherence, and higher rates of emergency room visits.Healthcare providers must recognize and respect cultural differences in healthcare practices. Culturally competent care involves tailoring interventions to meet the diverse needs of patients, considering language, traditions, and beliefs.Implementing targeted health education programs can improve health literacy and empower individuals to actively manage their chronic conditions. These programs should be accessible, culturally sensitive, and delivered through various channels, including community workshops and digital platforms [5,6].

Engaging communities in the development and implementation of healthcare programs fosters trust and encourages active participation. Localized outreach initiatives can improve awareness, promote preventive measures, and facilitate early detection of chronic diseases.Leveraging telehealth and technology can help overcome geographic barriers, particularly in rural areas. Remote monitoring, virtual consultations, and mobile health applications enhance access to healthcare services, providing ongoing support for chronic disease management [7,8].

Advocating for policy changes that address the root causes of health disparities is crucial. Policies promoting equal access to healthcare resources, workforce diversity, and community-based initiatives can contribute to reducing health disparities in chronic disease management.Collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals, community organizations, and policymakers are essential for comprehensive and effective chronic disease management. Interdisciplinary collaboration can ensure a holistic approach, addressing both medical and social determinants of health [9,10].

Conclusion

Addressing health disparities in chronic disease management is not only a moral imperative but also essential for building a healthier and more equitable society. By understanding the multifaceted nature of these disparities and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can work towards ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their background or socioeconomic status, have equal opportunities to achieve optimal health outcomes. As we move forward, it is crucial to prioritize research, policy changes, and community engagement to create a healthcare landscape that truly serves the diverse needs of every individual.

References

1. Walker C, Swerissen H, Belfrage J. Self-management: its place in the management of chronic illnesses. Aust Health Rev. 2003;26(2):34-42.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

2. Lorig K, Holman H. Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

3. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, et al. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:177-87.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

4. Greenhalgh T. Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: Beyond the expert patient. Br Med J. 2009;338:1-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

5. Van Hecke A, Heinen M, Fernandez-Ortega P, et al. Systematic literature review on effectiveness of self-management support interventions in patients with chronic conditions and low socio-economic status. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(4):775-93.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

6. Harvey PW, Docherty BM. Sisyphus and self-management: the chronic condition self-management paradox. Aust Health Rev. 2007;31(2):184-92.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

7. Williams D, Costa M, Odunlami A, et al. Moving upstream: how interventions that address the social determinants of health can improve health and reduce disparities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14:S8-17.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

8. Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, et al. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(2):190-3.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

9. Beauchamp A, Peeters A, Tonkin A, et al. Best practice for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease through an equity lens: a review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(5):599-606.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

10. Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. ‘It is surely a great criticism of our profession’ The next 20 years of equity-focused systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(4):291-2.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref